Transit in flex: Examining service fragmentation of app-based, on-demand transit services in Texas

被引:12
作者
Weinreich, David P. [1 ]
Reeves, S. Matthew [2 ]
Sakalker, Amruta [2 ]
Hamidi, Shima [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Arlington, Coll Architecture Planning & Publ Affairs, CAPPA Bldg Suite 203,Box 19108,601 West Nedderman, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[2] Univ Texas Arlington, Coll Architecture Planning & Publ Affairs, Arlington, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas Arlington, Coll Architecture Planning & Publ Affairs, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
关键词
Transportation Network Companies (TNC); App-based on-demand; Integration; Fragmentation; Interagency coordination; Public transit;
D O I
10.1016/j.trip.2019.100060
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
App-based, on-demand services are a nascent mode of public transportation, which can provide point to point transportation, first-last mile access to fixed route transit, or serve in place of paratransit, among other uses. First-last mile service has emerged as a dominant service model in the Federal Transit Administration's MOD Sandbox Program. However this service model also requires strong integration between app-based, on-demand services and the traditional fixed route lines they connect to. Following previous research identifying the role transit governmental institutions can play in creating barriers to service integration, this study examines whether and how governmental institutions known to impact fixed route services have a similar effect on app-based, on-demand modes. This study surveys cities and transit agencies across Texas. Interviews and archival analysis are used to identify fragmentation challenges and causes in app-based, on-demand services. This study finds that many of the jurisdictional challenges identified for fixed route services also apply to emerging app-based, on-demand services. However the need for integration of apps poses a challenge not seen before. Integration needs make app-based, on-demand services of limited suitability for first/last mile connectivity when provided by separate agencies or companies, when formal and informal coordination is poor, and when fixed route services are infrequent.(c) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]  
Liu R., 1998, Transp. Res. Rec., V1623
[22]  
Liu R., 1997, Transp. Res. Rec., V1607
[23]  
Miller M.A., 2003, UCBITSPRR200318
[24]   Transit service integration practices - A survey of US experiences [J].
Miller, MA ;
Englisher, L ;
Kaplan, B ;
Halvorsen, R .
TRANSIT: PLANNING, MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE, TECHNOLOGY, MARKETING AND FARE POLICY, AND CAPACITY AND QUALTIY OF SEVICE, 2005, 1927 :101-111
[25]  
NCTCOG, 2019, Alliance Link Funding to Trinity Metro
[26]  
Rayle L., 2014, APP BASED ON DEMAND
[27]   Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco [J].
Rayle, Lisa ;
Dai, Danielle ;
Chan, Nelson ;
Cervero, Robert ;
Shaheen, Susan .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2016, 45 :168-178
[28]   Transit Coordination in the U.S.: A Survey of Current Practice [J].
Rivasplata, Charles ;
Smith, Adam ;
Iseki, Hiroyuki .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, 2012, 15 (01) :53-73
[29]  
Rogers Brishen, 2015, SOCIAL COSTS UBER
[30]  
Sakalker A., 2018, Strategic Planning Manager. Personal Interview