Quantifying the benefits of a building retrofit using an integrated system approach: A case study

被引:44
作者
Regnier, Cynthia [1 ]
Sun, Kaiyu [1 ]
Hong, Tianzhen [1 ]
Piette, Mary Ann [1 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, 1 Cyclotron Rd, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
Building retrofit; Integrated system; Energy savings; Energy conservation measures; Building simulation; Integrated design; ENERGY RETROFIT; PERFORMANCE; SAVINGS; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.10.090
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Building retrofits provide a large opportunity to significantly reduce energy consumption in the buildings sector. Traditional building retrofits focus on equipment upgrades, often at the end of equipment life or failure, and result in replacement with marginally improved similar technology and limited energy savings. The Integrated System (IS) retrofit approach enables much greater energy savings by leveraging interactive effects between end use systems, enabling downsized or lower energy technologies. This paper presents a case study in Hawaii quantifying the benefits of an IS retrofit approach compared to two traditional retrofit approaches: a Standard Practice of upgrading equipment to meet minimum code requirements, and an Improved Practice of upgrading equipment to a higher efficiency. The IS approach showed an energy savings of 84% over existing building energy use, much higher than the traditional approaches of 13% and 33%. The IS retrofit also demonstrated the greatest energy cost savings potential. While the degree of savings realized from the IS approach will vary by building and climate, these findings indicate that savings on the order of 50% and greater are not possible without an IS approach. It is therefore recommended that the IS approach be universally adopted to achieve deep energy savings. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:332 / 345
页数:14
相关论文
共 43 条
[21]   Effectiveness of single and multiple energy retrofit measures on the energy consumption of office buildings [J].
Chidiac, S. E. ;
Catania, E. J. C. ;
Morofsky, E. ;
Foo, S. .
ENERGY, 2011, 36 (08) :5037-5052
[22]  
ClimateWorks Australia, 2010, AUSTR CARB TRUST REP
[23]   EnergyPlus: creating a new-generation building energy simulation program [J].
Crawley, DB ;
Lawrie, LK ;
Winkelmann, FC ;
Buhl, WF ;
Huang, YJ ;
Pedersen, CO ;
Strand, RK ;
Liesen, RJ ;
Fisher, DE ;
Witte, MJ ;
Glazer, J .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2001, 33 (04) :319-331
[24]  
Fluhrer C, 2010, ASHRAE TRAN, V116, P236
[25]   Review of US ESCO industry market trends: an empirical analysis of project data [J].
Goldman, CA ;
Hopper, NC ;
Osborn, JG .
ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (03) :387-405
[26]   Commercial Building Energy Saver: An energy retrofit analysis toolkit [J].
Hong, Tianzhen ;
Piette, Mary Ann ;
Chen, Yixing ;
Lee, Sang Hoon ;
Taylor-Lange, Sarah C. ;
Zhang, Rongpeng ;
Sun, Kaiyu ;
Price, Phillip .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 159 :298-309
[27]   Integrating economic considerations with operational and embodied emissions into a decision support system for the optimal ranking of building retrofit options [J].
Ibn-Mohammed, T. ;
Greenough, R. ;
Taylor, S. ;
Ozawa-Meida, L. ;
Acquaye, A. .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 72 :82-101
[28]   Energy performance indoor environmental quality retrofit - a European diagnosis and decision making method for building refurbishment [J].
Jaggs, M ;
Palmer, J .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2000, 31 (02) :97-101
[29]   Marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves: confronting theory and practice [J].
Kesicki, Fabian ;
Strachan, Neil .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2011, 14 (08) :1195-1204
[30]   Energy renovation of single-family houses in Denmark utilising long-term financing based on equity [J].
Kragh, J. ;
Rose, J. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2011, 88 (06) :2245-2253