The impact of grazing on spatial variability of humus profile properties in a grass-encroached Scots pine ecosystem

被引:18
作者
Smit, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Netherlands Ctr Geoecol Res, Dept Phys Geog & Soil Sci, NL-1018 VZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
spatial variability; humus form; grazing; organic matter; sampling strategy;
D O I
10.1016/S0341-8162(99)00003-X
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Grazing is often used in management of grass-encroached Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) forests in The Netherlands, because it is thought to increase diversity of vegetation and humus profiles. To test this hypothesis, two 1 ha plots in a primary pine stand on drift sand were grazed for 7 years at high and moderate intensities. The humus profiles of these two sites and of a control site were sampled at various scales to assess changes in grass biomass, thickness of ectorganic horizons, organic matter stocks, root stocks, and pH. Whether grazed or not, site factors such as slope angle and aspect, distance to trees and parent material did not explain the spatial variability of the plots. Spatial variability could be linked to the tussock structure of the grass layer. With continued grazing, ectorganic horizons became more compact (particularly the F horizon), stocks of organic matter increased, grass biomass decreased, variances tended to decrease and ranges tended to increase. These results suggest that at the landscape scale, where much variation in grazing intensity can be expected, spatial variability of humus profile properties and thus site diversity will increase. However, grazing intensities in the experiment were far greater than those normally employed in management of grass-encroached forests. Therefore grazing will scarcely affect site diversity, unless grazing variability is enhanced by special treatments, such as temporary fencing to create locally high grazing intensities. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 98
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
AERTS MAP, 1989, THESIS U UTRECHT
[2]  
[Anonymous], J COAST CONSERV
[3]  
ARP PA, 1984, CAN J SOIL SCI, V64, P423, DOI 10.4141/cjss84-043
[4]  
BAKKER JP, 1989, GEOBOTANIE, V14
[5]  
Burrough P.A., 2000, Principles of Geographic Information Systems
[6]  
Davis J.C., 2015, Statistics and data analysis in Geology, V3rd
[7]  
DEVRIES MFW, 1994, THESIA AGR U WAGENIN
[8]  
Emmer I. M., 1997, Lesnictvi (Prague), V43, P503
[9]  
EMMER IM, 1995, THESIS U AMSTERDAM
[10]  
FANTA J, 1986, FOREST DYNAMICS RES, P164