The flexible evolutionary anchorage-dependent Pardee's restriction point of mammalian cells. How its deregulation may lead to cancer

被引:28
作者
David-Pfeuty, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Curie Rech, CNRS, UMR 146, F-91405 Orsay, France
来源
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-REVIEWS ON CANCER | 2006年 / 1765卷 / 01期
关键词
cell cycle; cell growth; nucleolus; anchorage; homeostasis; cancer;
D O I
10.1016/j.bbcan.2005.08.008
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Living cells oscillate between the two states of quiescence and division that stand poles apart in terms of energy requirements, macromolecular composition and structural organization and in which they fulfill dichotomous activities. Division is a highly dynamic and energy-consuming process that needs be carefully orchestrated to ensure the faithful transmission of the mother genotype to daughter cells. Quiescence is a low-energy state in which a cell may still have to struggle hard to maintain its homeostasis in the face of adversity while waiting sometimes for long periods before finding a propitious niche to reproduce. Thus, the perpetuation of single cells rests upon their ability to elaborate robust quiescent and dividing states. This led yeast and mammalian cells to evolve rigorous Start [L.H. Hartwell, J. Culotti, J. Pringle, B.J. Reid, Genetic control of the cell division cycle in yeast, Science 183 (1974) 46-51] and restriction (R) points [A.B. Pardee, A restriction point for control of normal animal cell proliferation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 71 (1974) 1286-1290], respectively, that reduce deadly interferences between the two states by enforcing their temporal insulation though still enabling a rapid transition from one to the other upon an unpredictable change in their environment. The constitutive cells of multicelled organisms are extremely sensitive in addition to the nature of their adhering support that fluctuates depending on developmental stage and tissue specificity. Metazoan evolution has entailed, therefore, the need for exceedingly flexible anchorage-dependent R points empowered to assist cells in switching between quiescence and division at various times, places and conditions in the same organism. Programmed cell death may have evolved concurrently in specific contexts unfit for the operation of a stringent R point that increase the risk of deadly interferences between the two states (as it happens notably during development). But, because of their innate flexibility, anchorage-dependent R points have also the ability to readily adjust to a changing structural context so as to give mutated cells a chance to reproduce, thereby encouraging tumor genesis. The Rb and p53 proteins, which are regulated by the two products of the Ink4a-Arf locus [C.J. Sherr, The INK4a/ARF network in tumor suppression, Nat. Rev., Mol. Cell Biol. 2 (2001) 731-737], govern separable though interconnected pathways that cooperate to restrain cyclin D- and cyclin E-dependent kinases from precipitating untimely R point transit. The expression levels of the Ink4a and Arf proteins are especially sensitive to changes in cellular shape and adhesion that entirely remodel at the time when cells shift between quiescence and division. The Arf proteins further display an extremely high translational sensitivity and can activate the p53 pathway to delay R point transit, but, only when released from the nucleolus, 'an organelle formed by the act of building a ribosome' [T. Melese, Z. Xue, The nucleolus: an organelle formed by the act of building a ribosome, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7 (1995) 319-324]. In this way, the Ink4a/Rb and Arf/p53 pathways emerge as key regulators of anchorage-dependent R point transit in mammalian cells and their deregulation is, indeed, a rule in human cancers. Thus, by selecting the nucleolus to mitigate cell cycle control by the Arf proteins, mammalian cells succeeded in forging a highly flexible R point enabling them to match cell division with a growth rate imposed by factors controlling nucleolar assembling, such asnutrients and adhesion. It is noteworthy that nutrient control of critical size at Start in budding yeast has been shown recently to be governed by a nucleolar protein interaction network [P. Jorgensen, J.L. Nishikawa, B.-J. Breitkreutz, M. Tyers, Systematic identification of pathways that couple cell growth and division in yeast, Science 297 (2002) 395-400]. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 66
页数:29
相关论文
共 309 条
[1]   OXIDATIVE DAMAGE TO DNA - RELATION TO SPECIES METABOLIC-RATE AND LIFE-SPAN [J].
ADELMAN, R ;
SAUL, RL ;
AMES, BN .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1988, 85 (08) :2706-2708
[2]   Cyclin E and c-Myc promote cell proliferation in the presence of p16(INK4a) and of hypophosphorylated retinoblastoma family proteins [J].
Alevizopoulos, K ;
Vlach, J ;
Hennecke, S ;
Amati, B .
EMBO JOURNAL, 1997, 16 (17) :5322-5333
[3]   OXIDANTS, ANTIOXIDANTS, AND THE DEGENERATIVE DISEASES OF AGING [J].
AMES, BN ;
SHIGENAGA, MK ;
HAGEN, TM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1993, 90 (17) :7915-7922
[4]   CLOSING THE CELL-CYCLE CIRCLE IN YEAST - G2 CYCLIN PROTEOLYSIS INITIATED AT MITOSIS PERSISTS UNTIL THE ACTIVATION OF G1 CYCLINS IN THE NEXT CYCLE [J].
AMON, A ;
IRNIGER, S ;
NASMYTH, K .
CELL, 1994, 77 (07) :1037-1050
[5]   The retinoblastoma family of proteins directly represses transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [J].
Arneric, M ;
Traven, A ;
Staresincic, L ;
Sopta, M .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2002, 277 (11) :8797-8801
[6]   Telomere dysfunction promotes non-reciprocal translocations and epithelial cancers in mice [J].
Artandi, SE ;
Chang, S ;
Lee, SL ;
Alson, S ;
Gottlieb, GJ ;
Chin, L ;
DePinho, RA .
NATURE, 2000, 406 (6796) :641-645
[7]   Regulation of p53 stability [J].
Ashcroft, M ;
Vousden, KH .
ONCOGENE, 1999, 18 (53) :7637-7643
[8]   The retinoblastoma protein pathway and the restriction point [J].
Bartek, J ;
Bartkova, J ;
Lukas, J .
CURRENT OPINION IN CELL BIOLOGY, 1996, 8 (06) :805-814
[9]   p14ARF links the tumour suppressors RB and p53 [J].
Bates, S ;
Phillips, AC ;
Clark, PA ;
Stott, F ;
Peters, G ;
Ludwig, RL ;
Vousden, KH .
NATURE, 1998, 395 (6698) :124-125
[10]  
Bellan C, 2002, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V43, P3602