Hospital Variation in Patient-Reported Outcomes at the Level of EQ-5D Dimensions: Evidence from England

被引:33
作者
Gutacker, Nils [1 ]
Bojke, Chris [1 ]
Daidone, Silvio [1 ]
Devlin, Nancy [2 ]
Street, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Off Hlth Econ, London, England
关键词
EQ-5D; patient-reported outcomes (PRO); hierarchical ordered probit; provider profiling; quality measurement; performance assessment; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; HEALTH; QUALITY; INFORMATION; EUROQOL; MODELS; STATE; PANEL; HIP;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X13482523
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The English Department of Health has introduced routine collection of patient-reported outcome data for selected surgical procedures to facilitate patient choice and increase hospital accountability. However, using aggregate health outcome scores, such as EQ-5D utilities, for performance assessment purposes causes information loss and raises statistical and normative concerns. Objectives. For hip replacement surgery, we explore a) the change in patient-reported outcomes between baseline and follow-up on 5 health dimensions (EQ-5D), b) the extent to which treatment impact varies across hospitals, and c) the extent to which hospital performance on EQ-5D dimensions is correlated with performance on the EQ-5D utility index. Methods. We combine information on pre- and postoperative EQ-5D outcomes with routine inpatient data for the financial year 2009-2010. The sample consists of 21,000 patients in 153 hospitals. We employ hierarchical ordered probit risk-adjustment models that recognize the multilevel nature of the data and the response distributions. The treatment impact is modeled as a random coefficient that varies at the hospital level. We obtain hospital-specific empirical Bayes (ER) estimates of this coefficient. We estimate separate models for each EQ-5D dimension and the EQ-5D utility index and analyze correlations of EB estimates across these. Results. Hospital treatment is associated with improvements in all EQ-5D dimensions. Variability in treatment impact is most pronounced on the mobility and usual activities dimensions. Conversely, only pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression correlate well with performance measures based on utilities. This leads to different assessments of hospital performance across metrics. Conclusions. Our results indicate which hospitals are better than others in improving health across particular EQ-5D dimensions. We demonstrate the importance of evaluating dimensions of the EQ-5D separately for the purposes of hospital performance assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:804 / 818
页数:15
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Tails from the Peak District: Adjusted Limited Dependent Variable Mixture Models of EQ-5D Questionnaire Health State Utility Values [J].
Alava, Monica Hernandez ;
Wailoo, Allan J. ;
Ara, Roberta .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (03) :550-561
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, IMPROVING NHS PRODUC
[3]  
[Anonymous], ENGLISH INDICES DEPR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, MODELING ORDERED CHO
[5]   Regression Estimators for Generic Health-Related Quality of Life and Quality-Adjusted Life Years [J].
Basu, Anirban ;
Manca, Andrea .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2012, 32 (01) :56-69
[6]   Evaluating comorbidities in total hip and knee arthroplasty: available instruments. [J].
Bjorgul K. ;
Novicoff W.M. ;
Saleh K.J. .
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2010, 11 (4) :203-209
[7]   APPROXIMATE INFERENCE IN GENERALIZED LINEAR MIXED MODELS [J].
BRESLOW, NE ;
CLAYTON, DG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 88 (421) :9-25
[8]   EuroQol: The current state of play [J].
Brooks, R .
HEALTH POLICY, 1996, 37 (01) :53-72
[9]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[10]   Socioeconomic status affects the early outcome of total hip replacement [J].
Clement, N. D. ;
Muzammil, A. ;
MacDonald, D. ;
Howie, C. R. ;
Biant, L. C. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2011, 93B (04) :464-469