Green Finance and Green Energy Nexus in ASEAN Countries: A Bootstrap Panel Causality Test

被引:42
作者
Ahmed, Nihal [1 ]
Areche, Franklin Ore [2 ]
Sheikh, Adnan Ahmed [3 ]
Lahiani, Amine [1 ]
机构
[1] Orleans Univ, Orleans Inst Econ, CNRS, LEO,FRE 2014, F-45067 Orleans, France
[2] Natl Univ Huancavelica, Profess Sch Agroind Engn, Huancavelica 09001, Peru
[3] Air Univ, Dept Business Adm, Multan Campus, Multan 60000, Pakistan
关键词
renewable energy; energy efficiency; ASEAN; green economy; green finance; UNIT-ROOT TESTS; CO2; EMISSIONS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; POPULATION; POLICIES; STIRPAT; MARKET; IMPACT; POWER; IPAT;
D O I
10.3390/en15145068
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Green energy is a crucial component in addressing expanding energy demands and combating climate change, but the possible negative repercussions of these technologies are frequently disregarded. Green energy's deployment is tied to environmentally sustainable development goals (SDGs). It can only be achieved by scaling up the finance of investment that provides environmental benefits through new financial instruments and new policies, such as green banks, green bonds, community-based green funds, green central banking, etc. In an effort to address the issues with IPAT and ImPACT, this study employed the STIRPAT model approach, which is a proven framework for energy economics analysis. The author gathers yearly data spanning 2002-2018 for six ASEAN member countries with the aim of investigating the relationship between CO2 emissions, green finance, energy efficiency, and the green energy index (GEX). After preliminary tests, the study employed the Westerlund test and Johansen Fisher test for long-term equilibrium and estimated the Granger causal links between variables using the generalized method of moments (GMM). The results indicate that green bonds are an effective technique for promoting green energy projects and considerably reducing CO2 emissions. Therefore, governments should establish supporting policies with a long-term perspective to increase the investment of green energy projects related investment from private participants to ensure sustainable growth and address environmental challenges. This strategy may be appropriate during and after the COVID-19 period.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Environmental Impact determinants: An empirical analysis based on the STIRPAT model [J].
Aguir Bargaoui, Saoussen ;
Liouane, Naoufel ;
Nouri, Fethi Zouheir .
2ND WORLD CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 109 :449-458
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, WITHERING FULL BLOOM
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, IEA World Energy Outlook
[4]   Geothermal power generation in the world 2010-2014 update report [J].
Bertani, Ruggero .
GEOTHERMICS, 2016, 60 :31-43
[5]   Do energy efficiency policies save energy? A new approach based on energy policy indicators (in the EU Member States) [J].
Bertoldi, Paolo ;
Mosconi, Rocco .
ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 139
[6]  
Breitung J, 2000, ADV ECONOMETRICS, V15, P161
[7]  
Carrion-i-Silvestre JL, 2005, ECONOMET J, V8, P159
[8]   Liquid Biofuels Development in Southeast Asian Countries: An Analysis of Market, Policies and Challenges [J].
Chanthawong, Anuman ;
Dhakal, Shobhakar .
WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2016, 7 (01) :157-173
[9]   Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions [J].
Dietz, T ;
Rosa, EA .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1997, 94 (01) :175-179
[10]  
Dietz T., 1994, HUM ECOL REV, V1, P277