Robust Self-Tuning Sparse Subspace Clustering

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Guangtao [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Jiayu [3 ]
Ni, Jingjie [4 ]
Luo, Tingjin [5 ]
Long, Wei [6 ]
Zhen, Hai [7 ]
Cong, Gao [8 ]
Ye, Jieping [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Comp Med & Bioinformat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Michigan State Univ, Comp Sci & Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[4] Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co, Boston, MA USA
[5] Natl Univ Def Technol, Coll Sci, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[6] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Comp Sci, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[7] Agcy Sci Technol & Res, Singapore, Singapore
[8] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Engineer, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Cluster Number Estimation; Cluster Center; Sparse Subspace Clustering; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1109/ICDMW.2017.117
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Sparse subspace clustering (SSC) is an effective approach to cluster high-dimensional data. However, how to adaptively select the number of clusters/eigenvectors for different data sets, especially when the data are corrupted by noise, is a big challenge in SSC and also an open problem in field of data mining. In this paper, considering the fact that the eigenvectors are robust to noise, we develop a self-adaptive search method to select cluster number for SSC by exploiting the cluster-separation information from eigenvectors. Our method solves the problem by identifying the cluster centers over eigenvectors. We first design a new density based metric, called centrality coefficient gap, to measure such separation information, and estimate the cluster centers by maximizing the gap. After getting the cluster centers, it is straightforward to group the remaining points into respective clusters which contain their nearest neighbors with higher density. This leads to a new clustering algorithm in which the final randomly initialized k-means stage in traditional SSC is eliminated. We theoretically verify the correctness of the proposed method on noise-free data. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world data corrupted by noise demonstrate the robustness and effectiveness of the proposed method comparing to the well-established competitors.
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 865
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robust self-tuning controller and its stability analysis
    Dianzi Keji Diaxue Xuebao, 2 (156-160):
  • [42] Robust implicit self-tuning regulator: Convergence and stability
    Jagannathan, S
    Lewis, FL
    AUTOMATICA, 1996, 32 (12) : 1629 - 1644
  • [43] Robust Self-Tuning MTPA Algorithm for IPMSM Drives
    Anton, Dianov
    Young-Kwan, Kim
    Sang-Joon, Lee
    Sang-Taek, Lee
    IECON 2008: 34TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS SOCIETY, VOLS 1-5, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 1302 - 1307
  • [44] Robust self-tuning PID controller for nonlinear systems
    Tan, KK
    Huang, S
    Ferdous, R
    IECON'01: 27TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS SOCIETY, VOLS 1-3, 2001, : 758 - 763
  • [45] Robust self-tuning PID controller for nonlinear systems
    Tan, KK
    Huang, S
    Ferdous, R
    JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2002, 12 (07) : 753 - 761
  • [46] Self-Tuning Robust Stability Fuzzy Digital Controller
    Costa, Edson B. M.
    Serra, Ginalber L. O.
    2015 IEEE SYMPOSIUM SERIES ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (IEEE SSCI), 2015, : 1 - 7
  • [47] A self-tuning robust observer for marine surface vessels
    Nassim Khaled
    Nabil G. Chalhoub
    Nonlinear Dynamics, 2015, 79 : 937 - 951
  • [48] Minimum Error Entropy Based Sparse Representation for Robust Subspace Clustering
    Wang, Yulong
    Tang, Yuan Yan
    Li, Luoqing
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2015, 63 (15) : 4010 - 4021
  • [49] Human Motion Segmentation via Robust Kernel Sparse Subspace Clustering
    Xia, Guiyu
    Sun, Huaijiang
    Feng, Lei
    Zhang, Guoqing
    Liu, Yazhou
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2018, 27 (01) : 135 - 150
  • [50] A Self-tuning Possibilistic c-Means Clustering Algorithm
    Szilagyi, Laszlo
    Lefkovits, Szidonia
    Kucsvan, Zsolt Levente
    MODELING DECISIONS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (MDAI 2018), 2018, 11144 : 255 - 266