Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing cognitive vs. image-guided fusion prostate biopsy for the detection of prostate cancer

被引:49
|
作者
Watts, Kara L. [1 ,2 ]
Frechette, Laena [1 ]
Muller, Ben [3 ]
Ilinksy, Dan [2 ]
Kovac, Evan [1 ,2 ]
Sankin, Alex [1 ,2 ]
Aboumohamed, Ahmed [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[2] Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Urol, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[3] Washington Univ, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
Image guided biopsy; Fusion biopsy; Prostate cancer; MRI; Cognitive; Meta-analysis; TARGETED BIOPSY; ACCURACY; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.03.020
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing overall prostate cancer detection rate and clinically-significant prostate cancer detection rate between MRI-ultrasound image guided fusion biopsy (MRI-US FB) and cognitive biopsy (CB). Methods: A systematic review of Pubmed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane library databases was performed. Identified studies were assessed for clinical relevance and excluded based on a set of predefined criteria. Final articles included in the analysis comprised only prospective trials that compared CB vs. MRI-US FB in men with MRI-identifiable lesions (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score 2+). Articles were reviewed for patient demographics, MRI protocol, and rates of overall and clinically significant prostate cancer detection by both modalities. Results: Nine studies were analyzed. A composite 1,714 men with mean age 64.6 years and mean PSA 8.2 ng/dL were reviewed. When comparing FB to CB, the odds ratio for overall and for clinically significant prostate cancer detection was 1.11 (95%CI 0.91-1.36, P = 0.30) and 1.13 (95%CI 0.89-1.44, P = 0.32), respectively. Heterogeneity among the studies was moderate but not significant for either overall (X-2 = 14.67; I-2 = 45%; P = 0.07) or clinically significant prostate cancer detection (X-2 = 11.81; I-2 = 49%; P = 0.07). Conclusion: MRI-US FB demonstrates a trend toward improved rates of prostate cancer detection compared to CB, although this is not statistically significant. Further comparative studies may help to further elucidate whether one of these modalities is superior over the other. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:734.e19 / 734.e25
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance of cognitive vs. image-guided fusion biopsy for detection of overall and clinically significant prostate cancer in a multiethnic population
    Ho, Kevin
    Zhu, Denzel
    Gupta, Kavita
    Loloi, Justin
    Abramson, Max
    Watts, Kara
    Agalliu, Ilir
    Sankin, Alexander
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 42 (02) : 29e1 - 29e8
  • [2] The role of image-guided radiotherapy in prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Shilin
    Tang, Wen
    Luo, Huanli
    Jin, Fu
    Wang, Ying
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 38 : 81 - 89
  • [3] MRI/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Targeted Biopsy and Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Systematic Biopsy for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Xie, Jianfeng
    Jin, Chunchun
    Liu, Mengmeng
    Sun, Kun
    Jin, Zhanqiang
    Ding, Zhimin
    Gong, Xuehao
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [4] The Microultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy in Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    You, Chengyu
    Li, Xianhui
    Du, Yuelin
    Peng, Lei
    Wang, Hui
    Zhang, Xiaojun
    Wang, Anguo
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2022, 36 (03) : 394 - 402
  • [5] Value of three biopsy methods in prostate cancer detection: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Deng, Y-S
    He, Y-H
    Ying, W-W
    Liu, H-L
    Li, P-Z
    Ma, C-Y
    Ding, Z-S
    Chen, X.
    Wang, J-F
    Zhou, X-F
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 25 (05) : 2221 - 2234
  • [6] A systematic review and meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound guided fusion biopsy of prostate for cancer detection-Comparing transrectal with transperineal approaches
    Loy, Liang Meng
    Lim, Gek Hsiang
    Leow, Jeffrey J.
    Lee, Chau Hung
    Tan, Teck Wei
    Tan, Cher Heng
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 38 (08) : 650 - 660
  • [7] Moving away from systematic biopsies: image-guided prostate biopsy (in-bore biopsy, cognitive fusion biopsy, MRUS fusion biopsy) -literature review
    Yamada, Yasuhiro
    Ukimura, Osamu
    Kaneko, Masatomo
    Matsugasumi, Toru
    Fujihara, Atsuko
    Vourganti, Srinivas
    Marks, Leonard
    Sidana, Abhinav
    Klotz, Laurence
    Salomon, Georg
    de la Rosette, Jean
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (03) : 677 - 686
  • [8] Image-guided prostate biopsy robots: A review
    Zhang, Yongde
    Yuan, Qihang
    Muzzammil, Hafiz Muhammad
    Gao, Guoqiang
    Xu, Yong
    MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 20 (08) : 15135 - 15166
  • [9] Comparing the biopsy strategies of prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Yiqi Huang
    Cailiu Wei
    Fenjuan Chen
    Yanling Zhang
    Feifei Pu
    BMC Cancer, 25 (1)
  • [10] Results of fusion prostate biopsy comparing with cognitive and systematic biopsy
    Guerra-Lacambra, Marta
    Yanez-Castillo, Yaiza
    Folgueral-Corral, Mar
    Melgarejo-Segura, Maria Teresa
    Cano-Garcia, Maria del Carmen
    Sanchez-Tamayo, Francisco Javier
    Martin-Rodriguez, Jose Luis
    Arrabal-Polo, Miguel Angel
    Arrabal-Martin, Miguel
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 149 (16) : 15085 - 15090