Contraindications for external cephalic version in breech position at term: a systematic review

被引:36
作者
Rosman, Ageeth N. [1 ]
Guijt, Aline [1 ]
Vlemmix, Floortje [1 ]
Rijnders, Marlies [2 ]
Mol, Ben W. J. [1 ]
Kok, Marjolein [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] TNO Dept Child Hlth, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Breech; contraindications; external cephalic version; fetal version; systematic review; AMNIOTIC-FLUID INDEX; CESAREAN-SECTION; DELIVERY; RUPTURE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.12011
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective. External cephalic version (ECV) is a safe and effective intervention that can prevent breech delivery, thus reducing the need for cesarean delivery. It is recommended in national guidelines. These guidelines also mention contraindications for ECV, and thereby restrict the application of ECV. We assessed whether the formulation of these contraindications in guidelines are based on empiric data. Design. Systematic review. Population. Pregnant women with a singleton breech presentation from 34 weeks. Methods. We searched the National Guideline Clearinghouse, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (19532009), EMBASE (19802009), TRIP database (until 2011), NHS (National Health Services, until 2011), Diseases database (until 2011) and NICE guidelines (until 2011) for existing guidelines on ECV and studied the reproducibility of the contraindications stated in the guidelines. Furthermore, we systematically reviewed the literature for contraindications and evidence on these contraindications. Main outcome measures. Contraindications of ECV. Results. We found five guidelines mentioning 18 contraindications, varying from five to 13 per guideline. The contraindications were not reproducible between the guidelines with oligohydramnios as the only contraindication mentioned in all guidelines. The literature search yielded 60 studies reporting on 39 different contraindications, of which we could only assess evidence of six of them. Conclusion. The present study shows that there is no general consensus on the eligibility of patients for ECV. Therefore we propose to limit contraindications for ECV to clear empirical evidence or to those with a clear pathophysiological relevance.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 142
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Use of external cephalic version for breech presentation at term: A national survey of Norwegian birth units
    Pay, Aase Serine Devold
    Hetlebakke, Aslaug
    Glomsrod, Maren Pernille
    Bohn, Kristin
    Blix, Ellen
    SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE, 2022, 33
  • [42] Uptake of external cephalic version for term breech presentation: an Australian population study, 2002–2012
    Yu Sun Bin
    Christine L. Roberts
    Michael C. Nicholl
    Jane B. Ford
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17
  • [43] Cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version of breech presentation at term:: A comparative study
    Vézina, Y
    Bujold, E
    Varin, J
    Marquette, GP
    Boucher, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 190 (03) : 763 - 768
  • [44] Prediction of successful vaginal delivery in women undergoing external cephalic version at term for breech presentation
    Chan, LYS
    Leung, TY
    Fok, WY
    Chan, LW
    Lau, TK
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2004, 116 (01): : 39 - 42
  • [45] External cephalic version in premature rupture of membranes: a systematic review
    Quist-Nelson, Johanna
    Landers, Kathryn
    McCurdy, Rebekah
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2017, 30 (18) : 2257 - 2261
  • [46] Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: a single centre experience
    Ebner, Florian
    Friedl, Thomas W. P.
    Leinert, Elena
    Schramm, Amelie
    Reister, Frank
    Lato, Kristian
    Janni, Wolfgang
    DeGregorio, Nikolaus
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2016, 293 (04) : 749 - 755
  • [47] Maternal outcomes of term breech presentation delivery: impact of successful external cephalic version in a nationwide sample of delivery admissions in the United States
    Weiniger, Carolyn F.
    Lyell, Deirdre J.
    Tsen, Lawrence C.
    Butwick, Alexander J.
    Shachar, BatZion
    Callaghan, William M.
    Creanga, Andreea A.
    Bateman, Brian T.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2016, 16
  • [48] External Cephalic Version in Romanian Modern Obstetrics
    Botezatu, Radu
    Gica, Nicolae
    Peltecu, Gheorghe
    Panaitescu, Anca Maria
    PROCEEDINGS OF SOGR 2018: THE 17TH NATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE ROMANIAN SOCIETY OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY & FIRST ADVANCED COLPOSCOPY COURSE, 2019, : 126 - 132
  • [49] Prediction models for successful external cephalic version: a systematic review
    Velzel, Joost
    de Hundt, Marcella
    Mulder, Frederique M.
    Molkenboer, Jan F. M.
    Van der Post, Joris A. M.
    Mol, Ben W.
    Kok, Marjolein
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2015, 195 : 160 - 167
  • [50] Efficacy of a second external cephalic version (ECV) after a successful first external cephalic version with subsequent spontaneous reinversion to breech presentation: a retrospective cohort study
    Lee Reicher
    Anat Lavie
    Yuval Fouks
    Ofer Isakov
    Emmanuel Attali
    Yariv Yogev
    Sharon Maslovitz
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2021, 303 : 911 - 916