Contraindications for external cephalic version in breech position at term: a systematic review

被引:36
作者
Rosman, Ageeth N. [1 ]
Guijt, Aline [1 ]
Vlemmix, Floortje [1 ]
Rijnders, Marlies [2 ]
Mol, Ben W. J. [1 ]
Kok, Marjolein [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] TNO Dept Child Hlth, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Breech; contraindications; external cephalic version; fetal version; systematic review; AMNIOTIC-FLUID INDEX; CESAREAN-SECTION; DELIVERY; RUPTURE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.12011
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective. External cephalic version (ECV) is a safe and effective intervention that can prevent breech delivery, thus reducing the need for cesarean delivery. It is recommended in national guidelines. These guidelines also mention contraindications for ECV, and thereby restrict the application of ECV. We assessed whether the formulation of these contraindications in guidelines are based on empiric data. Design. Systematic review. Population. Pregnant women with a singleton breech presentation from 34 weeks. Methods. We searched the National Guideline Clearinghouse, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (19532009), EMBASE (19802009), TRIP database (until 2011), NHS (National Health Services, until 2011), Diseases database (until 2011) and NICE guidelines (until 2011) for existing guidelines on ECV and studied the reproducibility of the contraindications stated in the guidelines. Furthermore, we systematically reviewed the literature for contraindications and evidence on these contraindications. Main outcome measures. Contraindications of ECV. Results. We found five guidelines mentioning 18 contraindications, varying from five to 13 per guideline. The contraindications were not reproducible between the guidelines with oligohydramnios as the only contraindication mentioned in all guidelines. The literature search yielded 60 studies reporting on 39 different contraindications, of which we could only assess evidence of six of them. Conclusion. The present study shows that there is no general consensus on the eligibility of patients for ECV. Therefore we propose to limit contraindications for ECV to clear empirical evidence or to those with a clear pathophysiological relevance.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 142
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] External cephalic version in case of persisting breech presentation at term: Motivations and women's experience of the intervention
    Pichon, M.
    Guittier, M. -J.
    Irion, O.
    Boulvain, M.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2013, 41 (7-8): : 427 - 432
  • [32] Evaluation of knowledge of external cephalic version and term breech presentation management preferences in women of childbearing age
    Pinel Perez, C. S.
    Caliendo, C. G.
    Gomez-Roso Jareno, M. J.
    Lopez Galian, J. J.
    CLINICA E INVESTIGACION EN GINECOLOGIA Y OBSTETRICIA, 2021, 48 (04):
  • [33] External cephalic version: a safe procedure? A systematic review of version-related risks
    Collaris, RJ
    Oei, SG
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2004, 83 (06) : 511 - 518
  • [34] Prediction Models for Successful External Cephalic Version: An Updated Systematic Review
    Yerrabelli, Rahul Sai
    Lee, Claire
    Palsgaard, Peggy K.
    Lauinger, Alexa R.
    Abdelsalam, Omer
    Jennings, Valerie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024, 41 : e1 - e5
  • [35] Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - External Cephalic Version and other Interventions to turn Breech Babies to Cephalic Presentation
    Ducarme, G.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2020, 48 (01): : 81 - 94
  • [36] Effectiveness of nifedipine tocolysis to facilitate external cephalic version: a systematic review
    Wilcox, C. B.
    Nassar, N.
    Roberts, C. L.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (04) : 423 - 428
  • [37] External cephalic version of the non-cephalic presenting twin: a systematic review
    Felder, Laura
    McCurdy, Rebekah
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (09) : 1712 - 1718
  • [38] THE EFFICACY OF EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION AND ITS IMPACT ON THE BREECH EXPERIENCE
    HANSS, JW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 162 (06) : 1459 - 1464
  • [39] Teaching vaginal breech delivery and external cephalic version -: A survey of faculty attitudes
    Lavin, JP
    Eaton, J
    Hopkins, M
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2000, 45 (10) : 808 - 812
  • [40] Changing attitudes toward mode of delivery and external cephalic version in breech presentations
    Yogev, Y
    Horowitz, E
    Ben-Haroush, A
    Chen, R
    Kaplan, B
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2002, 79 (03) : 221 - 224