Contraindications for external cephalic version in breech position at term: a systematic review

被引:36
作者
Rosman, Ageeth N. [1 ]
Guijt, Aline [1 ]
Vlemmix, Floortje [1 ]
Rijnders, Marlies [2 ]
Mol, Ben W. J. [1 ]
Kok, Marjolein [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] TNO Dept Child Hlth, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Breech; contraindications; external cephalic version; fetal version; systematic review; AMNIOTIC-FLUID INDEX; CESAREAN-SECTION; DELIVERY; RUPTURE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.12011
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective. External cephalic version (ECV) is a safe and effective intervention that can prevent breech delivery, thus reducing the need for cesarean delivery. It is recommended in national guidelines. These guidelines also mention contraindications for ECV, and thereby restrict the application of ECV. We assessed whether the formulation of these contraindications in guidelines are based on empiric data. Design. Systematic review. Population. Pregnant women with a singleton breech presentation from 34 weeks. Methods. We searched the National Guideline Clearinghouse, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (19532009), EMBASE (19802009), TRIP database (until 2011), NHS (National Health Services, until 2011), Diseases database (until 2011) and NICE guidelines (until 2011) for existing guidelines on ECV and studied the reproducibility of the contraindications stated in the guidelines. Furthermore, we systematically reviewed the literature for contraindications and evidence on these contraindications. Main outcome measures. Contraindications of ECV. Results. We found five guidelines mentioning 18 contraindications, varying from five to 13 per guideline. The contraindications were not reproducible between the guidelines with oligohydramnios as the only contraindication mentioned in all guidelines. The literature search yielded 60 studies reporting on 39 different contraindications, of which we could only assess evidence of six of them. Conclusion. The present study shows that there is no general consensus on the eligibility of patients for ECV. Therefore we propose to limit contraindications for ECV to clear empirical evidence or to those with a clear pathophysiological relevance.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 142
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Obstetric outcome after successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term
    Theron, Gerhard B.
    Kader, Rahel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2014, 127 (03) : 298 - 299
  • [22] A prospective study of the factors associated with the success rate of external cephalic version for breech presentation at term
    Burgos, Jorge
    Carlos Melchor, Juan
    Ignacio Pijoan, Jose
    Cobos, Patricia
    Fernandez-Llebrez, Luis
    Martinez-Astorquiza, Txanton
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2011, 112 (01) : 48 - 51
  • [23] Effects of external cephalic version for breech presentation at or near term in high-resource settings: A systematic review of randomized and non-randomized studies
    Pay, Aase S. Devold
    Johansen, Katarina
    Staff, Anne C.
    Laine, Katariina H.
    Blix, Ellen
    Okland, Inger
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY, 2020, 4
  • [24] Improving external cephalic version for foetal breech presentation
    Zandstra, H.
    Mertens, H. J. M. M.
    FACTS VIEWS AND VISION IN OBGYN, 2013, 5 (02) : 85 - 90
  • [25] REPEATED EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION AT TERM
    ROSEN, DJD
    ILLECK, JS
    GREENSPOON, JS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 167 (02) : 508 - 509
  • [26] Survey of external cephalic version for breech presentation and neuraxial blockade use
    Weiniger, Carolyn F.
    Sultan, Pervez
    Dunn, Ashley
    Carvalho, Brendan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2016, 34 : 616 - 622
  • [27] Implementation of the external cephalic version in breech delivery. Dutch national implementation study of external cephalic version
    Floortje Vlemmix
    Ageeth N Rosman
    Margot AH Fleuren
    Marlies EB Rijnders
    Antje Beuckens
    Monique C Haak
    Bettina MC Akerboom
    Joke MJ Bais
    Simone MI Kuppens
    Dimitri N Papatsonis
    Brent C Opmeer
    Joris AM van der Post
    Ben Willem J Mol
    Marjolein Kok
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 10
  • [28] Predictors of success of external cephalic version: Bi-center study
    Dochez, V.
    Delbos, L.
    Esbelin, J.
    Volteau, C.
    Winer, N.
    Sentilhes, L.
    JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2016, 45 (05): : 509 - 515
  • [29] Effect of Oral Hydration on External Cephalic Version at Term
    Zobbi, Virna Franca
    Nespoli, Antonella
    Spreafico, Elisa
    Recalcati, Roberta
    Loi, Federica
    Scian, Antonietta
    Galimberti, Stefania
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2017, 46 (05): : 686 - 695
  • [30] Uptake of external cephalic version for term breech presentation: an Australian population study, 2002-2012
    Bin, Yu Sun
    Roberts, Christine L.
    Nicholl, Michael C.
    Ford, Jane B.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2017, 17