Contraindications for external cephalic version in breech position at term: a systematic review

被引:36
作者
Rosman, Ageeth N. [1 ]
Guijt, Aline [1 ]
Vlemmix, Floortje [1 ]
Rijnders, Marlies [2 ]
Mol, Ben W. J. [1 ]
Kok, Marjolein [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] TNO Dept Child Hlth, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Breech; contraindications; external cephalic version; fetal version; systematic review; AMNIOTIC-FLUID INDEX; CESAREAN-SECTION; DELIVERY; RUPTURE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.12011
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective. External cephalic version (ECV) is a safe and effective intervention that can prevent breech delivery, thus reducing the need for cesarean delivery. It is recommended in national guidelines. These guidelines also mention contraindications for ECV, and thereby restrict the application of ECV. We assessed whether the formulation of these contraindications in guidelines are based on empiric data. Design. Systematic review. Population. Pregnant women with a singleton breech presentation from 34 weeks. Methods. We searched the National Guideline Clearinghouse, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (19532009), EMBASE (19802009), TRIP database (until 2011), NHS (National Health Services, until 2011), Diseases database (until 2011) and NICE guidelines (until 2011) for existing guidelines on ECV and studied the reproducibility of the contraindications stated in the guidelines. Furthermore, we systematically reviewed the literature for contraindications and evidence on these contraindications. Main outcome measures. Contraindications of ECV. Results. We found five guidelines mentioning 18 contraindications, varying from five to 13 per guideline. The contraindications were not reproducible between the guidelines with oligohydramnios as the only contraindication mentioned in all guidelines. The literature search yielded 60 studies reporting on 39 different contraindications, of which we could only assess evidence of six of them. Conclusion. The present study shows that there is no general consensus on the eligibility of patients for ECV. Therefore we propose to limit contraindications for ECV to clear empirical evidence or to those with a clear pathophysiological relevance.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 142
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] External cephalic version for breech presentation at term
    Hofmeyr, G. Justus
    Kulier, Regina
    West, Helen M.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (04):
  • [2] Systematic review of adverse outcomes of external cephalic version and persisting breech presentation at term
    Nassar, N
    Roberts, CL
    Barratt, A
    Bell, JC
    Olive, EC
    Peat, B
    PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 20 (02) : 163 - 171
  • [3] External cephalic version for breech presentation before term
    Hutton, Eileen K.
    Hofmeyr, G. Justus
    Dowswell, Therese
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (07):
  • [4] External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation at and Near Term
    Jabeen, Sarwat
    Riaz, Tehreen
    Humayun, Shamsa
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2010, 4 (02): : 98 - 102
  • [5] Fear for external cephalic version and depression: predictors of successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term?
    Emily Ciliacus
    Marieke van der Zalm
    Sophie E Truijens
    Tom H Hasaart
    Victor J Pop
    Simone M Kuppens
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14
  • [6] Fear for external cephalic version and depression: predictors of successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term?
    Ciliacus, Emily
    van der Zalm, Marieke
    Truijens, Sophie E.
    Hasaart, Tom H.
    Pop, Victor J.
    Kuppens, Simone M.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2014, 14
  • [7] Neuraxial blockade for external cephalic version: a systematic review
    Sultan, P.
    Carvalho, B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2011, 20 (04) : 299 - 306
  • [8] External Cephalic Version and Reducing the Incidence of Term Breech Presentation
    Impey, L. W. M.
    Murphy, D. J.
    Griffiths, M.
    Bray, Eaton
    Penna, L. K.
    Aggarwal, A.
    Akaba, G.
    Barrett, J. F. R.
    Bogner, G.
    Danielian, P. J.
    de Hundt, M.
    Diyaf, A.
    El-Sayed, Y.
    Fernando, R.
    Gillham, J. C.
    Hemelaar, J.
    Hinshaw, H. K. S.
    Kumar, B.
    Leung, T. Y.
    McGregor, E. G.
    Paterson-Brown, S.
    Robinson, S.
    Say, R. E.
    Sentilhes, L.
    Sheridan, M.
    Sung, H. P.
    Vlemmix, F.
    Weiniger, C. F.
    Gupta, M.
    Sarkar, P.
    Gupta, M.
    Owen, P.
    Thomson, A. J.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 (07) : E179 - E192
  • [9] Prediction of Success in External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation at Term
    Isakov, Ofer
    Reicher, Lee
    Lavie, Anat
    Yogev, Yariv
    Maslovitz, Sharon
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 (05) : 857 - 866
  • [10] Systematic Kleihauer-Betke Test after External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation: Is It Useful?
    Lemaitre, Johanna
    Planche, Lucie
    Ducarme, Guillaume
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (07) : 1 - 9