Contraindications for external cephalic version in breech position at term: a systematic review

被引:36
作者
Rosman, Ageeth N. [1 ]
Guijt, Aline [1 ]
Vlemmix, Floortje [1 ]
Rijnders, Marlies [2 ]
Mol, Ben W. J. [1 ]
Kok, Marjolein [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] TNO Dept Child Hlth, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Breech; contraindications; external cephalic version; fetal version; systematic review; AMNIOTIC-FLUID INDEX; CESAREAN-SECTION; DELIVERY; RUPTURE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.12011
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective. External cephalic version (ECV) is a safe and effective intervention that can prevent breech delivery, thus reducing the need for cesarean delivery. It is recommended in national guidelines. These guidelines also mention contraindications for ECV, and thereby restrict the application of ECV. We assessed whether the formulation of these contraindications in guidelines are based on empiric data. Design. Systematic review. Population. Pregnant women with a singleton breech presentation from 34 weeks. Methods. We searched the National Guideline Clearinghouse, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (19532009), EMBASE (19802009), TRIP database (until 2011), NHS (National Health Services, until 2011), Diseases database (until 2011) and NICE guidelines (until 2011) for existing guidelines on ECV and studied the reproducibility of the contraindications stated in the guidelines. Furthermore, we systematically reviewed the literature for contraindications and evidence on these contraindications. Main outcome measures. Contraindications of ECV. Results. We found five guidelines mentioning 18 contraindications, varying from five to 13 per guideline. The contraindications were not reproducible between the guidelines with oligohydramnios as the only contraindication mentioned in all guidelines. The literature search yielded 60 studies reporting on 39 different contraindications, of which we could only assess evidence of six of them. Conclusion. The present study shows that there is no general consensus on the eligibility of patients for ECV. Therefore we propose to limit contraindications for ECV to clear empirical evidence or to those with a clear pathophysiological relevance.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 142
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   External cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36 cases and review of the literature [J].
Abenhaim, Haim A. ;
Varin, Jocelyne ;
Boucher, Marc .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (02) :156-160
[2]  
ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice, 2006, Obstet Gynecol, V108, P235
[3]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[4]   Prolapsed cord after external cephalic version in a patient with premature rupture of membranes and transverse lie [J].
Berghella, V .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2001, 99 (02) :274-275
[5]   THE INTRODUCTION OF EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION AT TERM INTO ROUTINE CLINICAL-PRACTICE [J].
BEWLEY, S ;
ROBSON, SC ;
SMITH, M ;
GLOVER, A ;
SPENCER, JAD .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1993, 52 (02) :89-93
[6]   The relationship between amniotic fluid index and successful external cephalic version: A 14-year experience [J].
Boucher, M ;
Bujold, E ;
Marquette, GP ;
Vezina, Y .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (03) :751-754
[7]   External cephalic version after rupture of membranes [J].
Brost, BC ;
Adams, JD ;
Hester, M .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (06) :1041-1041
[8]  
Caukwell S, 2002, J Obstet Gynaecol, V22, P486
[9]   External cephalic version: a safe procedure? A systematic review of version-related risks [J].
Collaris, RJ ;
Oei, SG .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2004, 83 (06) :511-518
[10]   External cephalic version after previous cesarean section: a series of 38 cases [J].
de Meeus, JB ;
Ellia, F ;
Magnin, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1998, 81 (01) :65-68