Evaluating validity and test-retest reliability in four drive for muscularity questionnaires

被引：19
|
作者：
Tod, David [1 ]
Morrison, Todd G. [2 ]
Edwards, Christian [3 ]
机构：
[1] Aberystwyth Univ, Dept Sport & Exercise Sci, Aberystwyth SY23 3FD, Ceredigion, Wales
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Psychol, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W0, Canada
[3] Univ Worcester, Inst Sport & Exercise Sci, Worcester, Worcs, England
来源：
BODY IMAGE | 2012年 / 9卷 / 03期
关键词：
Drive for muscularity; Body image; Psychometrics; Concurrent validity; Discriminant validity; Test-retest reliability; SCALE; MEN;
D O I：
10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.02.001
中图分类号：
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号：
040203 ;
摘要：
The current study assessed relationships among four commonly used drive for muscularity questionnaires. along with their 7 and 14 day test-retest reliability. Sample 1 was comprised of young British adult males (N = 272; M-AGE = 20.3) who completed the questionnaires once. Sample 2, a group of young British adult males (N = 54, M-AGE = 19.3), completed the questionnaires three times spaced 7 and 14 days apart. Correlations among Sample 1 ranged from .20 to .82 providing evidence for concurrent and discriminant validities. Evidence for test-retest reliability emerged with intraclass correlations ranging from .78 to .95 (p < .001) and generally nonsignificant r-tests (p > .05). Overall, the data support the psychometric properties of the drive for muscularity inventories; however, the shared variance (35-67%) hints that refinement is possible. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved,
引用
收藏
页码：425 / 428
页数：4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of the Dutch Version of the Chronic Otitis Media Benefit Inventory
    De Greve, Glynnis
    van Dinther, Joost
    Maryn, Youri
    Vanspauwen, Robby
    Zarowski, Andrzej
    Offeciers, Erwin
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ADVANCED OTOLOGY, 2019, 15 (01) : 34 - +
  • [32] Test-retest reliability of chemosensory evoked potentials
    Welge-Lüssen, A
    Wille, C
    Renner, B
    Kobal, T
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 20 (02) : 135 - 142
  • [33] THE TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF USER INVOLVEMENT INSTRUMENTS
    TORKZADEH, G
    DOLL, WJ
    INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 1994, 26 (01) : 21 - 31
  • [34] Test-retest reliability of voluntary emotion regulation
    Lee, Hyejeen
    Shackman, Alexander J.
    Jackson, Daren C.
    Davidson, Richard J.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 46 (04) : 874 - 879
  • [35] Test-retest reliability of reinforcement learning parameters
    Schaaf, Jessica V.
    Weidinger, Laura
    Molleman, Lucas
    van den Bos, Wouter
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2024, 56 (05) : 4582 - 4599
  • [36] Test-retest reliability of the eating disorder examination
    Rizvi, SL
    Peterson, CB
    Crow, SJ
    Agras, WS
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS, 2000, 28 (03) : 311 - 316
  • [37] Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of the 3-Meter Backward Walk Test in Stroke Survivors
    Kapan, Ali
    Ristic, Milos
    Yang, Lin
    Kranz, Gottfried
    Waldhoer, Thomas
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (23)
  • [38] Clarifying the Reliability Paradox: Poor Test-Retest Reliability Attenuates Group Differences
    Karvelis, Povilas
    Diaconescu, Andreea O.
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 95 (10) : S189 - S189
  • [39] The test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the five times sit to stand test and step test in older adults with total hip arthroplasty
    Ozden, Fatih
    Coskun, Gokhan
    Bakirhan, Serkan
    EXPERIMENTAL GERONTOLOGY, 2020, 142
  • [40] Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the Virtual Peg Insertion Test to quantify upper limb function in patients with chronic stroke
    Tobler-Ammann, Bernadette C.
    de Bruin, Eling D.
    Fluet, Marie-Christine
    Lambercy, Olivier
    de Bie, Rob A.
    Knols, Ruud H.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2016, 13
12345