Early orthodontic treatment for Class II malocclusion reduces the chance of incisal trauma: Results of a Cochrane systematic review

被引:43
作者
Thiruvenkatachari, Badri [1 ]
Harrison, Jayne [2 ]
Worthington, Helen [3 ]
O'Brien, Kevin [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Dent, Orthodont, NIHR, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Dent Hosp, Dept Orthodont, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Sch Dent, Cochrane Oral Hlth Grp, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Univ Manchester, Sch Dent, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
TWIN-BLOCK APPLIANCE; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SKELETAL; MULTICENTER; 1-PHASE; STABILITY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.01.030
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
In this article, we summarize the most clinically relevant findings of our recently updated Cochrane systematic review into the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Methods: A systematic review of the databases was performed to identify all randomized controlled trials evaluating early treatment with functional appliances to correct Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Results: Three early treatment studies with data from 353 participants were included in this review. The results showed no significant difference for any outcomes, except new incidence of incisor trauma, which was significantly less for the early treatment group. The risk ratio analysis for new incisor trauma showed that providing early treatment reduced the risk of trauma by 33% and 41% in the functional and headgear groups, respectively. However, when the numbers needed to treat were calculated, early treatment with functional appliances prevents 1 incidence of incisal trauma for every 10 patients (95% CI, 5-174), and headgear treatment prevents 1 incidence of incisal trauma for every 6 patients (95% CI, 3-23). Conclusions: Orthodontic treatment for young children, followed by a later phase of treatment when the child is in early adolescence, appears to reduce the incidence of new incisal trauma significantly compared with treatment that is provided in 1 phase when the child is in early adolescence. However, these data should be interpreted with caution because of the high degree of uncertainty. There are no other advantages in providing 2-phase treatment compared with 1 phase in early adolescence.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 59
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] ALMEIDA MA, 1995, ANGLE ORTHOD, V65, P43
  • [2] [Anonymous], J DENT RES
  • [3] [Anonymous], EUROPEAN J ORTHODONT
  • [4] [Anonymous], EUROPEAN J ORTHODONT
  • [5] [Anonymous], NAT CHILDR DENT HLTH
  • [6] [Anonymous], J DENT RES
  • [7] Effect of timing on the outcomes of 1-phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusion
    Baccetti, Tiziano
    Franchi, Lorenzo
    Kim, Ludia H.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2009, 136 (04) : 501 - 509
  • [8] Bailleau Aude, 2012, Orthod Fr, V83, P289, DOI 10.1051/orthodfr/2012027
  • [9] Bollen Anne-Marie, 2011, J Evid Based Dent Pract, V11, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.jebdp.2010.11.010
  • [10] External apical root resorption in Class II malocclusion: A retrospective review of 1-versus 2-phase treatment
    Brin, I
    Tulloch, JFC
    Koroluk, L
    Philips, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2003, 124 (02) : 151 - 156