Identifying effective interventions for promoting parent engagement and family reunification for children in out-of-home care: A series of meta-analyses

被引:29
作者
Maltais, Christine [1 ]
Cyr, Chantal [2 ]
Parent, Genevieve [3 ]
Pascuzzo, Katherine [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Sud de Ile de Montreal, Ctr Integre Univ Sante & Serv Sociaux, Unite Evaluat Technol & Modes Intervent, Direct Enseignement Univ & Rech, Montreal, PQ H3W 1W5, Canada
[2] Univ Quebec Montreal, Dept Psychol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Quebec Outaouais, Dept Psychoeduc & Psychol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[4] Ctr Sud de Ile de Montreal, Inst Univ Jeunes Difficulte, Ctr Integre Univ Sante & Serv Sociaux, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
关键词
Parental engagement; Reunification; Intervention; Residential care; Out-of-home care; Placement; Child protection services; Maltreatment; Meta-analysis; WELFARE SERVICES; CLIENT ENGAGEMENT; ENGAGING FAMILIES; OUTCOMES; PROTECTION; PROGRAM; ABUSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.12.009
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Background: An important obstacle for family reunification following child placement in residential care and other temporary out-of-home care services is the lack of engagement among parents. Objective: The aim of this meta-analysis is to identify the most effective interventions to promote parental engagement and family reunification. Method and participants: Eight studies, for a total of 2996 families, were used to conduct two series of meta-analyses. Each study examined the effectiveness of a goal-oriented parental engagement intervention, relative to a control group made up of parents who received standard services. Six moderators were analyzed: type of clinical modality, number of clinical strategies, sources of motivation for intervention, focus on the child care staff-parent relationship, child care staff training, and strategies to promote access to intervention. Results: Results indicate that parents exposed to goal-oriented engagement interventions showed greater engagement (effect size d = 0.71, CI: 0.35-1.07, p < 0.001) and likelihood of reunification (effect size OR = 2.49, CI: 1.22-5.10, p < 0.05) than parents who received standard services. In particular, moderator analysis showed that parents who specifically participated in a family-focused intervention showed the highest engagement in comparison to parents involved in other types of interventions or who received standard services (effect size d = 1.08, CI: 0.58-1.59, p < 0.001). No moderators significantly explained heterogeneity of studies on family reunification. Conclusion- Overall, the results underline the effectiveness of family-focused interventions to promote parental engagement. Nevertheless, greater knowledge on the mechanisms by which interventions can increase parents' engagement and family reunification is still needed.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 375
页数:14
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [51] Meta-Analytic Findings of the Relation Between Maternal Prenatal Stress and Anxiety and Child Cognitive Outcome
    Tarabulsy, George M.
    Pearson, Jessica
    Vaillancourt-Morel, Marie-Pier
    Bussieres, Eve-Line
    Madigan, Sheri
    Lemelin, Jean-Pascal
    Duchesneau, Andree-Anne
    Hatier, David-Emmanuel
    Royer, Francois
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL AND BEHAVIORAL PEDIATRICS, 2014, 35 (01) : 38 - 43
  • [52] Thoburn J., 2010, DOES FOSTER CARE WOR, P29
  • [53] Watt B.D., 2007, J CHILD FAM STUD, V16, P522, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S10826-006-9103-4, 10.1007/s10826-006- 9103-4]
  • [54] Wolf F. M., 1986, Metaanalysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis
  • [55] Effects of Family Treatment Drug Courts on Substance Abuse and Child Welfare Outcomes
    Worcel, Sonia D.
    Furrer, Carrie J.
    Green, Beth L.
    Burrus, Scott W. M.
    Finigan, Michael W.
    [J]. CHILD ABUSE REVIEW, 2008, 17 (06) : 427 - 443
  • [56] Family reunification
    Wulczyn, F
    [J]. FUTURE OF CHILDREN, 2004, 14 (01) : 95 - 113
  • [57] Measuring client engagement from the client's perspective in nonvoluntary child protective services
    Yatchmenoff, DK
    [J]. RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2005, 15 (02) : 84 - 96