Role of Insurance Coverage in Contraceptive Use After Abortion

被引:7
作者
Biggs, M. Antonia [1 ]
Taylor, Diana [1 ]
Upadhyay, Ushma D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Adv New Stand Reprod Hlth, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
ACTING REVERSIBLE CONTRACEPTION; PROVISION; BARRIERS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000002361
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To assess postaspiration abortion contraceptive use and the role of insurance coverage for abortion in a state that covers abortion and contraception for low-income women. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a previously published prospective study to assess the safety of abortion provision. From 2007 through 2013, women seeking first-trimester aspiration abortion were recruited at 25 clinical facilities within four Planned Parenthood affiliates and Kaiser Permanente of Northern California. Patients' medical charts were reviewed to assess the contraceptive methods received on the day of the abortion. A 4-week follow-up survey assessed contraceptive use and contraceptive-related incidents. Primary outcomes included leaving with any method on the day of the abortion and use of any method at the 4-week assessment. Secondary outcomes included intrauterine device or implant use on the day of the procedure and at 4 weeks and switching to a less effective method at 4 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 19,673 women agreed to participate, and 13,904 (71%) completed the 4-week followup survey. Ninety-four percent (18,486/19,673) left their abortion visit with a contraceptive method: 21% (4,111/19,673) with an intrauterine device, implant, or permanent method. By the 4-week survey, 8% (1,135/13,904) switched from a high-or medium-efficacy method to a low-efficacy or no method; 0.4% (60/13,904) experienced a contraceptive incident. In adjusted regression analyses, women who paid for the abortion with Medicaid were significantly more likely to use any method (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.70, 95% CI 3.094.42) or an intrauterine device or implant (adjusted OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.92-2.38) on the day of the abortion than those who did not pay with insurance. Experiencing a contraceptive-related incident was associated with switching to a low-efficacy or no method by the 4-week survey (adjusted OR 3.98, 95% CI 2.20-7.22). CONCLUSION: Insurance coverage for abortion is associated with postabortion contraceptive provision and use, even in settings that cover abortions and contraception for low-income women.
引用
收藏
页码:1338 / 1346
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Factors Influencing the Provision of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception in California
    Biggs, M. Antonia
    Harper, Cynthia C.
    Malvin, Jan
    Brindis, Claire D.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 (03) : 593 - 602
  • [2] Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007-2009
    Finer, Lawrence B.
    Jerman, Jenna
    Kavanaugh, Megan L.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2012, 98 (04) : 893 - 897
  • [3] Projections and opinions from 100 experts in long-acting reversible contraception
    Foster, Diana Greene
    Barar, Rana
    Gould, Heather
    Gomez, Ivette
    Nguyen, Deborah
    Biggs, M. Antonia
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2015, 92 (06) : 543 - 552
  • [4] Contraception following abortion and the treatment of incomplete abortion
    Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
    Kallner, Helena Kopp
    Faundes, Anibal
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2014, 126 : S52 - S55
  • [5] Women or LARC First? Reproductive Autonomy And the Promotion of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods
    Gomez, Anu Manchikanti
    Fuentes, Liza
    Allina, Amy
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2014, 46 (03) : 171 - 175
  • [6] Increasing intrauterine contraception use by reducing barriers to post-abortal and interval insertion
    Goodman, Suzan
    Hendlish, Sarah K.
    Benedict, Courtney
    Reeves, Matthew F.
    Pera-Floyd, Madeline
    Foster-Rosales, Anne
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2008, 78 (02) : 136 - 142
  • [7] Postabortion Contraceptive Use and Continuation When Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Is Free
    Goyal, Vinita
    Canfield, Caitlin
    Aiken, Abigail R. A.
    Dermish, Amna
    Potter, Joseph E.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 (04) : 655 - 662
  • [8] Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices
    Grimes, David A.
    Lopez, Laureen M.
    Schulz, Kenneth F.
    Stanwood, Nancy L.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (06):
  • [9] Reductions in pregnancy rates in the USA with long-acting reversible contraception: a cluster randomised trial
    Harper, Cynthia C.
    Rocca, Corinne H.
    Thompson, Kirsten M.
    Morfesis, Johanna
    Goodman, Suzan
    Darney, Philip D.
    Westhoff, Carolyn L.
    Speidel, J. Joseph
    [J]. LANCET, 2015, 386 (9993) : 562 - 568
  • [10] Patients' attitudes and experiences related to receiving contraception during abortion care
    Kavanaugh, Megan L.
    Carlin, Elizabeth E.
    Jones, Rachel K.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2011, 84 (06) : 585 - 593