Extracting Rhetorical Question from Twitter

被引:0
|
作者
Suzuki, Rinji [1 ]
Nadamoto, Akiyo [1 ]
机构
[1] Konan Univ, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
来源
22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION INTEGRATION AND WEB-BASED APPLICATIONS & SERVICES (IIWAS2020) | 2020年
关键词
Rhetorical question; SNS; Web mining; Opinion mining; Sentiment analysis;
D O I
10.1145/3428757.3429123
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Many types of content exist on SNSs. Sometimes authors' opinions are not properly communicated to the reader. The content might be inflammatory, known as flaming. We infer the importance of extracting passages in which the author's opinion is not communicated correctly when it is presented to the reader. This study particularly examines tweets, a popular message system of the Twitter SNS, and also specifically examines "rhetorical questions." Rhetorical questions are sometimes known as mandarin sentences. People might misunderstand them and might flame the author. We consider it important to extract rhetorical question tweets automatically and present them. This paper proposes a method to extract rhetorical question tweets. First, we propose two definitions of rhetorical question tweets by our preliminary experiment. Next we propose a method extracting rhetorical question tweets based on two definitions. Definition 1 is Including the author's opinion in a question. Definition 2 is Including an author's opinion sentence, commentary sentence, or sentiment reversal in a sentence. Specifically, we proposed a method of opinion sentence extraction, commentary sentence extraction, and sentiment reversal extraction. Furthermore, we conducted two experiments and measured the benefits of our proposed methods.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 299
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Extracting Contextonyms from Twitter for Stance Detection
    Gadek, Guillaume
    Betsholtz, Josefin
    Pauchet, Alexandre
    Brunessaux, Stephan
    Malandain, Nicolas
    Vercouter, Laurent
    ICAART: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGENTS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 2, 2017, : 132 - 141
  • [2] Extracting patterns from Twitter to promote biking
    Das, Subasish
    Dutta, Anandi
    Medina, Gabriella
    Minjares-Kyle, Lisa
    Elgart, Zachary
    IATSS RESEARCH, 2019, 43 (01) : 51 - 59
  • [3] What is a rhetorical question?
    Mrazkova, Kamila
    SLOVO A SLOVESNOST, 2010, 71 (01): : 31 - 52
  • [4] Rhetorical question as a communicative act
    Dobrovol'skij, Dmitrij O.
    Zalizniak, Anna A.
    VOPROSY YAZYKOZNANIYA, 2025, (01): : 7 - 35
  • [5] A Study on the Coordination of Chinese Rhetorical Question in Conversation
    Zhang Wenxian
    Yue Yao
    YUYAN KEXUE-LINGUISTIC SCIENCES, 2018, 17 (02): : 147 - 159
  • [6] Towards Extracting Drug-Effect Relation From Twitter: A Supervised Learning Approach
    Yu, Fan
    Moh, Melody
    Moh, Teng-Sheng
    2016 IEEE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA SECURITY ON CLOUD (BIGDATASECURITY), IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HIGH PERFORMANCE AND SMART COMPUTING (HPSC), AND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT DATA AND SECURITY (IDS), 2016, : 339 - 344
  • [7] Extracting Emotion Quotient of Viral Information Over Twitter
    Kumar, Pawan
    Reji, Reiben Eappen
    Singh, Vikram
    DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY, ICDCIT 2022, 2022, 13145 : 210 - 226
  • [8] Extracting Emotion and Sentiment Quotient of Viral Information Over Twitter
    Kumar, Pawan
    Reji, Reiben Eappen
    Singh, Vikram
    INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS DESIGN AND APPLICATIONS, ISDA 2021, 2022, 418 : 23 - 33
  • [9] The processing of prosodic cues to rhetorical question interpretation: Psycholinguistic and neurolinguistics evidence
    Kharaman, Mariya
    Xu, Manluolan
    Eulitz, Carsten
    Braun, Bettina
    INTERSPEECH 2019, 2019, : 1218 - 1222
  • [10] Extracting Gamers' Opinions from Reviews
    Sirbu, Dorinela
    Secui, Ana
    Dascalu, Mihai
    Crossley, Scott Andrew
    Ruseti, Stefan
    Trausan-Matu, Stefan
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 18TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SYMBOLIC AND NUMERIC ALGORITHMS FOR SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING (SYNASC), 2016, : 227 - 232