Genetic Characterization of Variation in Captive and Wild Woundfin

被引:2
作者
Chen, Yongjiu [1 ,2 ]
Conway, Carole
Keeler-Foster, Connie [1 ]
Hamman, Roger
Meismer, Steve [3 ]
机构
[1] Dexter Natl Fish Hatchery & Technol Ctr, Mol Ecol Lab, Dexter, NM 88230 USA
[2] N Dakota State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Fargo, ND 58105 USA
[3] Virgin River Resource Management & Recovery Progr, St George, UT 84770 USA
关键词
PLAGOPTERUS-ARGENTISSIMUS; POPULATION-GENETICS; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; DIVERSITY; FISHES; WATER; RIVER;
D O I
10.1577/M07-191.1
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
The woundfin Plagopterus argentissimus is an endangered species that has been extirpated front most of its historic range in the Colorado River basin, now occurring only in the main-stem Virgin River. In 1987, refugial stocks were established at the Dexter National Fish Hatchery and Technology Center (Dexter) as a hedge against extinction. Offspring from the captive populations have been released in the Virgin River since 1993, by which time wild populations had markedly declined. This study was conducted to determine whether the stocks at Dexter have retained the character of the wild donor stocks as indicated by the distribution of genetic variation within and between stocks. The genetic composition of captive populations may diverge from that of wild donor populations, even over relatively short time periods, owing to founder effect, genetic drift, and selection for traits that are advantageous in captivity. Captive and wild stocks were surveyed, both spatially and temporally, using 10 microsatellite markers developed at Dexter. Microsatellite markers are considered selectively neutral, and this study measured genetic changes due to random evolutionary processes (given our approach, it would be unlikely to identify changes at nonneutral loci due to selection). Overall, the woundfin exhibited high levels of genetic variation for a freshwater species. The samples from the captive and wild woundfin populations had similar levels of heterozygosity, but generally the captive populations had fewer alleles. A comparison of composite samples of captive stocks and recent wild stocks yielded an F-ST value of 0.004. Although statistically significant, this level of genetic distance is typical of well-mixed or undifferentiated stocks. After 20 years of captive propagation, the stocks at Dexter do not appear to have been impacted by founder effect or genetic drift.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 849
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, GENETIX 4 05 LOGICIE
[2]   How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies [J].
Bonin, A ;
Bellemain, E ;
Eidesen, PB ;
Pompanon, F ;
Brochmann, C ;
Taberlet, P .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2004, 13 (11) :3261-3273
[3]  
Cope E.D., 1874, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc, V14, P129
[4]  
DEACON JE, 1988, FISHERIES, V13, P18, DOI 10.1577/1548-8446(1988)013<0018:TEWAWM>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   Microsatellite variation in marine, freshwater and anadromous fishes compared with other animals [J].
DeWoody, JA ;
Avise, JC .
JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 2000, 56 (03) :461-473
[7]   Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management [J].
Edmands, Suzanne .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2007, 16 (03) :463-475
[8]   Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis [J].
Excoffier, Laurent ;
Laval, Guillaume ;
Schneider, Stefan .
EVOLUTIONARY BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 1 :47-50
[9]   Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs [J].
Frankham, Richard .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2008, 17 (01) :325-333
[10]   How large must populations be to retain evolutionary potential? [J].
Franklin, I. R. ;
Frankham, R. .
ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 1998, 1 (01) :69-70