共 32 条
XELOX vs. FOLFOX in metastatic colorectal cancer: An updated meta-analysis
被引:74
作者:
Guo, Yu
[1
]
Xiong, Bing-Hong
[2
]
Zhang, Tao
[3
]
Cheng, Yong
[1
]
Ma, Li
[4
]
机构:
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, 1 Youyi Rd, Chongqing 400016, Peoples R China
[2] Kunming Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gastrointestinal & Hernia Surg, Sch Clin Med 1, Kunming, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Oncol, Chongqing 400016, Peoples R China
[4] Third Hosp Mianyang, Dept Emergency, Mianyang, Peoples R China
关键词:
Colorectal cancer;
Fluorouracil;
Capecitabine;
Oxaliplatin;
CAPECITABINE PLUS OXALIPLATIN;
RANDOMIZED PHASE-III;
1ST-LINE TREATMENT;
ORAL CAPECITABINE;
COLON-CANCER;
FLUOROURACIL;
LEUCOVORIN;
THERAPY;
5-FLUOROURACIL/LEUCOVORIN;
SURVIVAL;
D O I:
10.3109/07357907.2015.1104689
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
This meta-analysis aims to evaluate chemotherapy with XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) versus FOLFOX (fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin) as a treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in terms of efficacy and safety. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing XELOX versus FOLFOX were included. A total of 4,363 patients from eight RCTs were available for analysis. Pooled analysis revealed that there were no statistical differences between both arms in OS, and ORR. XELOX arm had a higher incidence of thrombocytopenia, hand-foot syndrome, and diarrhea, whereas neutropenia had a higher incidence in the FOLFOX group. For mCRC, the effect of XELOX is similar to FOLFOX.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 104
页数:11
相关论文