A comparative study of robust efficiency analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis with imprecise data

被引:113
作者
Wei, Guiwu [1 ]
Wang, Jiamin [2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Normal Univ, Sch Business, Chengdu 610101, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Long Isl Univ, Coll Management, Post Campus,720 Northern Blvd, Brookville, NY 11548 USA
关键词
Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA); Performance measurement; Robust efficiency analysis; Perfect efficiency; Potential efficiency; Imprecise data; MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY; DEA MODELS; IDEA; BOUNDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2017.03.043
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Data Envelopment Analysis gauges the performance of operating entities in the best scenario for input and output multipliers. Robust efficiency analysis is a conservative approach that is concerned with an assured level of performance for an entity across all possible multiplier scenarios. In this study, we extend the robust efficiency analysis procedure to the situation where precise information on some input and output data is unavailable. Perfect efficiency analysis and potential efficiency analysis methods are developed to determine, respectively, the lower and upper bounds of an entity's robust efficiency rating. The concepts of robust efficiency are expanded to classify entities in consideration into three groups: perfectly robust efficient, potentially robust efficient and robust inefficient. Two approaches are presented to convert robust efficiency analysis models into linear programs. It is claimed that Data Envelopment Analysis and robust efficiency analysis together provide a comprehensive picture of an entity's relative efficiency. A computational experiment is conducted to compare the traditional efficiency analysis method with robust efficiency analysis in the presence of imprecise data. The results illustrate that perfect efficiency analysis exhibits a superior power of discrimination than potential efficiency analysis and that an entity recommended by perfect efficiency analysis has a satisfactory average performance. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 38
页数:11
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Decision quality using ranked attribute weights [J].
Barron, FH ;
Barrett, BE .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1996, 42 (11) :1515-1523
[2]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[3]   Imprecise dea - Envelopment and multiplier model approaches [J].
Chen, Yao .
ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 24 (02) :279-291
[4]   Rank order data in DEA: A general framework [J].
Cook, Wade D. ;
Zhu, Joe .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 174 (02) :1021-1038
[5]   An illustrative application of idea (imprecise Data Envelopment Analysis) to a Korean mobile telecommunication company [J].
Cooper, WW ;
Park, KS ;
Yu, G .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2001, 49 (06) :807-820
[6]   IDEA and AR-IDEA: Models for dealing with imprecise data in DEA [J].
Cooper, WW ;
Park, KS ;
Yu, G .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1999, 45 (04) :597-607
[7]   Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data [J].
Despotis, DK ;
Smirlis, YG .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 140 (01) :24-36
[8]   Pitfalls and protocols in DEA [J].
Dyson, RG ;
Allen, R ;
Camanho, AS ;
Podinovski, VV ;
Sarrico, CS ;
Shale, EA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 132 (02) :245-259
[9]   Efficiency bounds and efficiency classifications in DEA with imprecise data [J].
Park, K. S. .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2007, 58 (04) :533-540
[10]   Duality, efficiency computations and interpretations in imprecise DEA [J].
Park, K. Sam .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 200 (01) :289-296