Factors influencing Filipino children's solutions to addition and subtraction word problems

被引:9
作者
Bautista, Debbie [1 ]
Mitchelmore, Michael [1 ]
Mulligan, Joanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Sch Educ, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
关键词
arithmetic; English as a second language; comprehension; primary; ENGLISH-LANGUAGE LEARNERS; REPRESENTATIONS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1080/01443410903254591
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Young Filipino children are expected to solve mathematical word problems in English, which is not their mother tongue. Because of this, it is often assumed that Filipino children have difficulties in solving problems because they cannot read or comprehend what they have read. This study tested this assumption by determining whether presenting word problems in Filipino or reading them aloud to children in either language facilitated solution accuracy. Contrary to the initial hypothesis, reading word problems aloud did not seem to improve student performance (p 0.10). In contrast, presenting word problems in Filipino significantly improved solution accuracy (p 0.0001) and led to differences in error patterns - children were less likely to use an inappropriate arithmetic operation when problems were presented in Filipino. However, the language of the problem had minimal effects on the more difficult Compare problem type. Finally, the benefits of using Filipino were more pronounced for low-achieving students who may have lower proficiency in English than their high-achieving peers (p 0.01).
引用
收藏
页码:729 / 745
页数:17
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [41] Riley M. S., 1983, Reports, Learning Research and Development Center, P153
  • [42] Sheskin DJ., 2007, Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures, V4, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781420036268
  • [43] WHAT MAKES CERTAIN ARITHMETIC WORD-PROBLEMS INVOLVING THE COMPARISON OF SETS SO DIFFICULT FOR CHILDREN
    STERN, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 85 (01) : 7 - 23
  • [44] Trochim W. M., 2001, Research methods knowledge base, V2
  • [45] Vergnaud G., 1998, J MATH BEHAV, V17, P167, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80057-3, 10.1016/s0364-0213]
  • [46] Verschaffel L., 2000, MAKING SENSE WORD PR
  • [47] Verschaffel L., 2007, Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, V2nd, P557
  • [48] Verschaffel L., 1997, Learning and teaching mathematics: An international perspective, P69
  • [49] Whang W.-H., 1996, Educational Studies in Mathematics, V30, P289, DOI [10.1007/BF00304569, DOI 10.1007/BF00304569]
  • [50] Young C., 2002, INT J BILING EDUC BI, V5, P221, DOI DOI 10.1080/13670050208667757