Chest Magnetic Resonance Imaging Decreases Inter-observer Variability of Gross Target Volume for Lung Tumors

被引:6
|
作者
Basson, Laurent [1 ,2 ]
Jarraya, Hajer [3 ]
Escande, Alexandre [1 ,2 ]
Cordoba, Abel [1 ]
Daghistani, Rayyan [2 ,3 ]
Pasquier, David [1 ,2 ]
Lacornerie, Thomas [4 ]
Lartigau, Eric [1 ,2 ]
Mirabel, Xavier [1 ]
机构
[1] Oscar Lambret Comprehens Canc Ctr, Univ Radiat Oncol Dept, Lille, France
[2] Univ Lille, Lille, France
[3] Oscar Lambret Comprehens Canc Ctr, Med Imaging Dept, Lille, France
[4] Oscar Lambret Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Lille, France
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2019年 / 9卷
关键词
lung cancer; GTV; chest MRI; inter-observer variability; delineation; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; CANCER DELINEATION; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOTHERAPY; PET; IMPACT; CT; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2019.00690
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: PET/CT is a standard medical imaging used in the delineation of gross tumor volume (GTV) in case of radiation therapy for lung tumors. However, PET/CT could present some limitations such as resolution and standardized uptake value threshold. Moreover, chest MRI has shown good potential in diagnosis for thoracic oncology. Therefore, we investigated the influence of chest MRI on inter-observer variability of GTV delineation. Methods and Materials: Five observers contoured the GTV on CT for 14 poorly defined lung tumors during three contouring phases based on true daily clinical routine and acquisition: CT phase, with only CT images; PET phase, with PET/CT; and MRI phase, with both PET/CT and MRI. Observers waited at least 1 week between each phases to decrease memory bias. Contours were compared using descriptive statistics of volume, coefficient of variation (COV), and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Results: MRI phase volumes (median 4.8 cm(3)) were significantly smaller than PET phase volumes (median 6.4 cm(3), p = 0.015), but not different from CT phase volumes (median 5.7 cm(3), p = 0.30). The mean COV was improved for the MRI phase (0.38) compared to the CT (0.58, p = 0.024) and PET (0.53, p = 0.060) phases. The mean DSC of the MRI phase (0.67) was superior to those of the CT and PET phases (0.56 and 0.60, respectively; p < 0.001 for both). Conclusions: The addition of chest MRI seems to decrease inter-observer variability of GTV delineation for poorly defined lung tumors compared to PET/CT alone and should be explored in further prospective studies.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Definition of gross tumor volume in lung cancer: inter-observer variability
    Van de Steene, J
    Linthout, N
    de Mey, J
    Vinh-Hung, V
    Claassens, C
    Noppen, M
    Bel, A
    Storme, G
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2002, 62 (01) : 37 - 49
  • [2] Inter-Observer and Intra-Observer Variability in Gross Tumor Volume Delineation of Primary Esophageal Carcinomas Based on Different Combinations of Diagnostic Multimodal Images
    Li, Fengxiang
    Li, Yankang
    Wang, Xue
    Zhang, Yingjie
    Liu, Xijun
    Liu, Shanshan
    Wang, Wei
    Wang, Jinzhi
    Guo, Yanluan
    Xu, Min
    Li, Jianbin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [3] Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability for lung cancer target volume delineation in the 4D-CT era
    Louie, Alexander V.
    Rodrigues, George
    Olsthoorn, Jason
    Palma, David
    Yu, Edward
    Yaremko, Brian
    Ahmad, Bela
    Aivas, Inge
    Gaede, Stewart
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 95 (02) : 166 - 171
  • [4] Inter-observer agreement of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging on gross tumor volume delineation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an initial study
    Zhou, Nan
    Hu, Anning
    Shi, Zhihao
    Wang, Xiaolu
    Zhu, Qiongjie
    Zhou, Qun
    Ma, Jun
    Zhao, Feng
    Kong, Weiwei
    He, Jian
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2021, 11 (02) : 579 - 585
  • [5] Inter-Observer Variability in MR-Based Target Volume Delineation of Uveal Melanoma
    Jaarsma-Coes, Myriam G.
    Klaassen, Lisa
    Verbist, Berit M.
    Vu, T. H. Khanh
    Klaver, Yvonne L. B.
    Rodrigues, Myra F.
    Nabarro, Claire
    Luyten, Gregorius P. M.
    Rasch, Coen R. N.
    van Herk, Marcel
    Beenakker, Jan-Willem M.
    ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 8 (03)
  • [6] Prostate tumor delineation using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: Inter-observer variability and pathology validation
    Steenbergen, Peter
    Haustermans, Karin
    Lerut, Evelyne
    Oyen, Raymond
    De Weyer, Liesbeth
    Van den Bergh, Laura
    Kerkmeijer, Linda G. W.
    Pameijer, Frank A.
    Veldhuis, Wouter B.
    van Zyp, Jochem R. N. van der Voort
    Pos, Floris J.
    Heijmink, Stijn W.
    Kalisvaart, Robin
    Teertstra, Hendrik J.
    Dinh, Cuong V.
    Ghobadi, Ghazaleh
    van der Heide, Uulke A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 (02) : 186 - 190
  • [7] Critical discussion of evaluation parameters for inter-observer variability in target definition for radiation therapy
    Fotina, I.
    Luetgendorf-Caucig, C.
    Stock, M.
    Poetter, R.
    Georg, D.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2012, 188 (02) : 160 - 167
  • [8] Inter-observer variability between radiologists reporting on cerebellopontine angle tumours on magnetic resonance imaging
    Teh, S. R.
    Ranguis, S.
    Fagan, P.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2017, 131 : S47 - S49
  • [9] PET segmentation of bulky tumors: Strategies and workflows to improve inter-observer variability
    Pfaehler, Elisabeth
    Burggraaff, Coreline
    Kramer, Gem
    Zijlstra, Josee
    Hoekstra, Otto S.
    Jalving, Mathilde
    Noordzij, Walter
    Brouwers, Adrienne H.
    Stevenson, Marc G.
    de Jong, Johan
    Boellaard, Ronald
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (03):
  • [10] Inter-observer variability in chest radiograph reading for diagnosing acute lung injury in children
    Angoulvant, Francois
    Llor, Juan
    Alberti, Corinne
    Kheniche, Ahmed
    Zaccaria, Isabelle
    Garel, Catherine
    Dauger, Stephane
    PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 2008, 43 (10) : 987 - 991