21-day oral etoposide for metastatic breast cancer - A phase II study and review of the literature

被引:17
|
作者
Saphner, T
Weller, EA
Tormey, DC
Pandya, KJ
Falkson, CI
Stewart, J
Robert, NJ
机构
[1] Green Bay Oncol, Green Bay, WI 54307 USA
[2] Fairfax Prince William Hematol Oncol, Annandale, VA USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Ctr Comprehens Canc, Madison, WI USA
[4] Univ Pretoria, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
[5] Univ Rochester, Rochester, NY USA
[6] AMC Canc Res Ctr, Denver, CO USA
[7] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS | 2000年 / 23卷 / 03期
关键词
breast cancer; etoposide; VP-16;
D O I
10.1097/00000421-200006000-00010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Previous studies of etoposide for metastatic breast cancer commonly used bolus regimens given over a short period of time and included heavily pretreated patients. Results were poor. Chronic oral regimens would be expected to be superior to bolus doses based on pharmacologic studies and patients with less previous chemotherapy would be expected to have higher response rates. We studied the efficacy of oral etoposide at a dose of 50 mg/m(2)/day for 21 days of a 28-day cycle in good-risk patients with metastatic breast cancer. Healthy patients (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0, 1, or 2) who had not received chemotherapy for at least 1 year before study entry were selected for therapy. Thirty-four patients were entered: three patients were ineligible and one was cancelled. Thirty patients were available for analysis of response. One complete response and eight partial responses were documented (response rate, 30%: 95% confidence interval, 15-49%). A higher response rate was observed in those patients who never received chemotherapy compared with those who had received prior chemotherapy (57 vs. 6%, p = 0.004). There were two treatment-related deaths, both owing to myelosuppression and infection. We found long-term administration of oral etoposide to have a reasonable response rate for metastatic breast cancer (30%). Our response rate was comparable to those of other published studies of long-term oral etoposide regimens for metastatic breast cancer. Response rates in single-arm studies have generally been higher for long-term oral regimens than those for bolus regimens. We also found the regimen to be significantly toxic, an observation that may be underemphasized in the earlier literature.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 262
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Phase I/II study of gemcitabine plus mitoxantrone as salvage chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer
    Lorusso, V
    Crucitta, E
    Silvestris, N
    Catino, A
    Caporusso, L
    Mazzei, A
    Guida, M
    Latorre, A
    Sambiasi, D
    D'Amico, C
    Schittulli, F
    Calabrese, P
    De Lena, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 88 (04) : 491 - 495
  • [42] Mitomycin C and vinblastine in anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer: A phase II study
    Kalofonos, HP
    Onyenadum, A
    Kosmas, C
    Koutras, A
    Petsas, T
    Efthimiou, V
    Koukouras, D
    Tzoracolefterakis, E
    Andrikopoulos, P
    Androulakis, J
    TUMORI, 2001, 87 (06) : 394 - 397
  • [43] Phase II study of sequential hormonal therapy with anastrozole/exemestane in advanced and metastatic breast cancer
    Iaffaioli, R
    Formato, R
    Tortoriello, A
    Del Prete, S
    Caraglia, M
    Pappagallo, G
    Pisano, A
    Fanelli, F
    Ianniello, G
    Cigolari, S
    Pizza, C
    Marano, O
    Pezzella, G
    Pedicini, T
    Febbraro, A
    Incoronato, P
    Manzione, L
    Ferrari, E
    Marzano, N
    Quattrin, S
    Pisconti, S
    Nasti, G
    Giotta, G
    Colucci, G
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 92 (09) : 1621 - 1625
  • [44] A randomized phase II study of sequential docetaxel and doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide in patients with metastatic breast cancer
    Perez, EA
    Geeraerts, L
    Suman, VJ
    Adjei, AA
    Baron, AT
    Hatfield, AK
    Maihle, N
    Michalak, JC
    Kuross, SA
    Kugler, JW
    Lafky, JM
    Ingle, JN
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (08) : 1225 - 1235
  • [45] Phase I/II study of gemcitabine plus mitoxantrone as salvage chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer
    V Lorusso
    E Crucitta
    N Silvestris
    A Catino
    L Caporusso
    A Mazzei
    M Guida
    A Latorre
    D Sambiasi
    C D'Amico
    F Schittulli
    P Calabrese
    M De Lena
    British Journal of Cancer, 2003, 88 : 491 - 495
  • [46] Phase II study of 4-weekly capecitabine monotherapy in advanced/metastatic breast cancer
    Kusama, Mikihiro
    Nomizu, Tadashi
    Aogi, Kenjiro
    Yoshimoto, Masataka
    Horikoshi, Noboru
    Tabei, Toshio
    Noguchi, Shinzaburo
    Miura, Shigeto
    Yoshimura, Norio
    Kimura, Morihiko
    Toyama, Kazushige
    Shin, Eisei
    BREAST CANCER, 2010, 17 (04) : 233 - 240
  • [47] Phase II study of 4-weekly capecitabine monotherapy in advanced/metastatic breast cancer
    Mikihiro Kusama
    Tadashi Nomizu
    Kenjiro Aogi
    Masataka Yoshimoto
    Noboru Horikoshi
    Toshio Tabei
    Shinzaburo Noguchi
    Shigeto Miura
    Norio Yoshimura
    Morihiko Kimura
    Kazushige Toyama
    Eisei Shin
    Breast Cancer, 2010, 17 : 233 - 240
  • [48] Oncogenic osteomalacia and metastatic breast cancer: a case report and review of the literature
    Constantinos Savva
    Jason Adhikaree
    Srinivasan Madhusudan
    Kamal Chokkalingam
    Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders, 2019, 18 : 267 - 272
  • [49] Phase II trial of gemcitabine as prolonged infusion in metastatic breast cancer
    Schmid, P
    Akrivakis, K
    Flath, B
    Grosse, Y
    Sezer, O
    Mergenthaler, HG
    Possinger, K
    ANTI-CANCER DRUGS, 1999, 10 (07) : 625 - 631
  • [50] Phase II study of sequential hormonal therapy with anastrozole/exemestane in advanced and metastatic breast cancer
    R V Iaffaioli
    R Formato
    A Tortoriello
    S Del Prete
    M Caraglia
    G Pappagallo
    A Pisano
    F Fanelli
    G Ianniello
    S Cigolari
    C Pizza
    O Marano
    G Pezzella
    T Pedicini
    A Febbraro
    P Incoronato
    L Manzione
    E Ferrari
    N Marzano
    S Quattrin
    S Pisconti
    G Nasti
    G Giotta
    G Colucci
    British Journal of Cancer, 2005, 92 : 1621 - 1625