21-day oral etoposide for metastatic breast cancer - A phase II study and review of the literature

被引:17
|
作者
Saphner, T
Weller, EA
Tormey, DC
Pandya, KJ
Falkson, CI
Stewart, J
Robert, NJ
机构
[1] Green Bay Oncol, Green Bay, WI 54307 USA
[2] Fairfax Prince William Hematol Oncol, Annandale, VA USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Ctr Comprehens Canc, Madison, WI USA
[4] Univ Pretoria, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
[5] Univ Rochester, Rochester, NY USA
[6] AMC Canc Res Ctr, Denver, CO USA
[7] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS | 2000年 / 23卷 / 03期
关键词
breast cancer; etoposide; VP-16;
D O I
10.1097/00000421-200006000-00010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Previous studies of etoposide for metastatic breast cancer commonly used bolus regimens given over a short period of time and included heavily pretreated patients. Results were poor. Chronic oral regimens would be expected to be superior to bolus doses based on pharmacologic studies and patients with less previous chemotherapy would be expected to have higher response rates. We studied the efficacy of oral etoposide at a dose of 50 mg/m(2)/day for 21 days of a 28-day cycle in good-risk patients with metastatic breast cancer. Healthy patients (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0, 1, or 2) who had not received chemotherapy for at least 1 year before study entry were selected for therapy. Thirty-four patients were entered: three patients were ineligible and one was cancelled. Thirty patients were available for analysis of response. One complete response and eight partial responses were documented (response rate, 30%: 95% confidence interval, 15-49%). A higher response rate was observed in those patients who never received chemotherapy compared with those who had received prior chemotherapy (57 vs. 6%, p = 0.004). There were two treatment-related deaths, both owing to myelosuppression and infection. We found long-term administration of oral etoposide to have a reasonable response rate for metastatic breast cancer (30%). Our response rate was comparable to those of other published studies of long-term oral etoposide regimens for metastatic breast cancer. Response rates in single-arm studies have generally been higher for long-term oral regimens than those for bolus regimens. We also found the regimen to be significantly toxic, an observation that may be underemphasized in the earlier literature.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 262
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A multicentre phase II study of carboplatin and prolonged oral etoposide in the treatment of cancer of unknown primary site (CUPS)
    Warner, E
    Goel, R
    Chang, J
    Chow, W
    Verma, S
    Dancey, J
    Franssen, E
    Dulude, H
    Girouard, M
    Correia, J
    Gallant, G
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 77 (12) : 2376 - 2380
  • [32] Phase II study of oral etoposide and intravenous paclitaxel in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer
    Perez, EA
    Geoffroy, FJ
    Hillman, S
    Johnson, EA
    Farr, GH
    Tazelarr, HD
    Hatfield, AK
    Krook, JE
    Maillard, JA
    Levitt, R
    Marks, RS
    LUNG CANCER, 2004, 44 (03) : 347 - 353
  • [33] Phase II trial of temsirolimus in patients with metastatic breast cancer
    Fleming, Gini F.
    Ma, Cynthia X.
    Huo, Dezheng
    Sattar, Husain
    Tretiakova, Maria
    Lin, L.
    Hahn, Olwen M.
    Olopade, F. O.
    Nanda, R.
    Hoffman, Philip C.
    Naughton, M. J.
    Pluard, Timothy
    Conzen, Suzanne D.
    Ellis, Matthew J.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 136 (02) : 355 - 363
  • [34] Phase II trial of temsirolimus in patients with metastatic breast cancer
    Gini F. Fleming
    Cynthia X. Ma
    Dezheng Huo
    Husain Sattar
    Maria Tretiakova
    L. Lin
    Olwen M. Hahn
    F. O. Olopade
    R. Nanda
    Philip C. Hoffman
    M. J. Naughton
    Timothy Pluard
    Suzanne D. Conzen
    Matthew J. Ellis
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2012, 136 : 355 - 363
  • [35] Multicentric phase II study of cisplatin and etoposide in patients with metastatic carcinoma of unknown primary
    Voog, E
    Merrouche, Y
    Trillet-Lenoir, V
    Lasset, C
    Peaud, PY
    Rebattu, P
    Negrier, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2000, 23 (06): : 614 - 616
  • [36] Ovarian Cancer Metastatic to the Breast Presenting as Inflammatory Breast Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review
    Klein, Rebecca L.
    Brown, Amanda R.
    Gomez-Castro, Christian M.
    Chambers, Setsuko K.
    Cragun, Janiel M.
    Grasso-LeBeau, Lauren
    Lang, Julie E.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 1 : 27 - 31
  • [37] PHASE-I-II STUDY OF HIGH-DOSE ETOPOSIDE IN PATIENTS WITH REFRACTORY BREAST-CANCER
    FRASCHINI, G
    HOLMES, FA
    ESPARZA, L
    THERIAULT, RL
    BUZDAR, AU
    HORTOBAGYI, GN
    INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 1991, 9 (04) : 365 - 367
  • [38] Phase I-II study of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, doxorubicin, methotrexate, and long-term oral etoposide (FLAME) in unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer
    Bjarnason, GA
    Cripps, C
    Goel, R
    Fine, S
    Oza, AM
    Skillings, JR
    Kerr, I
    Germond, CJ
    Moore, MJ
    Maroun, JA
    Franssen, E
    Dulude, H
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1998, 21 (06): : 537 - 542
  • [39] Oncogenic osteomalacia and metastatic breast cancer: a case report and review of the literature
    Savva, Constantinos
    Adhikaree, Jason
    Madhusudan, Srinivasan
    Chokkalingam, Kamal
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND METABOLIC DISORDERS, 2019, 18 (01) : 267 - 272
  • [40] Phase II study of prolonged oral therapy with etoposide (VP16) for patients with recurrent malignant glioma
    Fulton, D
    Urtasun, R
    Forsyth, P
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 1996, 27 (02) : 149 - 155