Incorporating feasibility protocols in intervention research

被引:60
作者
Gadke, Daniel L. [1 ]
Kratochwill, Thomas R. [2 ]
Gettinger, Maribeth [2 ]
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Counseling Educ Psychol & Fdn, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Educ Psychol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
Feasibility research; Feasibility dimensions; Evidence-based practice; GOOD BEHAVIOR GAME; TREATMENT ACCEPTABILITY; TREATMENT INTEGRITY; SCHOOL-PSYCHOLOGY; MEASURING FIDELITY; IMPLEMENTATION; PILOT; CHILD; SCIENCE; CONCEPTUALIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsp.2020.11.004
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
In this paper, we review some dimensions of feasibility research. Feasibility research focuses on the intervention process and addresses questions about whether and how an intervention can be evaluated and implemented. Feasibility studies are implemented prior to conducting an outcome-focused pilot study or full-scale evaluation to test the effectiveness of an intervention. We propose a feasibility framework that includes 10 possible dimensions to evaluate in a feasibility trial, including (a) recruitment capability, (b) data collection procedures, (c) design procedures, (d) social validity, (e) practicality, (f) integration into existing systems, (g) adaptability, (h) implementation, (i) effectiveness, and (j) generalizability. Among these dimensions we offer some priorities that researchers can consider in establishing feasibility. Although feasibility investigations can advance evidence-based practice in psychology and education, we review current challenges for researchers to consider when incorporating a feasibility protocol into their intervention research agenda.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 18
页数:18
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   THE GENERALIZATION MAP REVISITED - ASSESSMENT OF GENERALIZED TREATMENT EFFECTS IN CHILD AND ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR-THERAPY [J].
ALLEN, JS ;
TARNOWSKI, KJ ;
SIMONIAN, SJ ;
ELLIOTT, D ;
DRABMAN, RS .
BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 1991, 22 (03) :393-405
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Procedures and standards handbook (Version 4.1)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, WHAT WORKS CLEARINGH
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, GROWTH URB POP OUTP
[5]   Journal Article Reporting Standards for Quantitative Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report [J].
Appelbaum, Mark ;
Cooper, Harris ;
Kline, Rex B. ;
Mayo-Wilson, Evan ;
Nezu, Arthur M. ;
Rao, Stephen M. .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2018, 73 (01) :3-25
[6]   What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy [J].
Arain, Mubashir ;
Campbell, Michael J. ;
Cooper, Cindy L. ;
Lancaster, Gillian A. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2010, 10
[7]   Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies [J].
Avery, Kerry N. L. ;
Williamson, Paula R. ;
Gamble, Carrol ;
Francischetto, Elaine O'Connell ;
Metcalfe, Chris ;
Davidson, Peter ;
Williams, Hywel ;
Blazeby, Jane M. .
BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (02)
[8]   Qualitative methods to ensure acceptability of behavioral and social interventions to the target population [J].
Ayala, Guadalupe X. ;
Elder, John P. .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH DENTISTRY, 2011, 71 :S69-S79
[9]  
Baker Monya., 2015, Nature, DOI DOI 10.1038/NATURE.2015.17433
[10]   GOOD BEHAVIOR GAME - EFFECTS OF INDIVIDUAL CONTINGENCIES FOR GROUP CONSEQUENCES ON DISRUPTIVE BEHAVIOR IN A CLASSROOM [J].
BARRISH, HH ;
SAUNDERS, M ;
WOLF, MM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1969, 2 (02) :119-&