How the Type of Content in Educative Augmented Reality Application Affects the Learning Experience

被引:28
作者
Diaz, Christian [1 ]
Hincapie, Mauricio [1 ]
Moreno, Gustavo [1 ]
机构
[1] IUSH, Medellin, Colombia
来源
2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE VIRTUAL AND AUGMENTED REALITY IN EDUCATION | 2015年 / 75卷
关键词
static and dynamic contents; augmented reality; fundamentals of electronics;
D O I
10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.239
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Nowadays, the use of technology to improve teaching and learning experiences in the classroom has been promoted. One of these technologies is augmented reality, which allows overlaying layers of virtual information on real scene with the aim of increasing the perception the user has of reality. In the educational context augmented reality have proved to offer several advantages, i.e. increasing learning engagement and increasing understanding of some topics, especially when spatial skills are involved. Contents deployed in an augmented reality application are of two types, static, i.e. text, or dynamic, i.e. animations. As far as we know no research project has assessed how the type of content, static or dynamic, can affect the student learning experience in augmented reality applications. In this article the development and evaluation of an augmented reality application using static and dynamic content is described. In order to determine how the type of content affects the learning experience of the student, an experimental design in which the student interact with the application, using static and dynamic contents, for learning topics related with an electronic fundamentals course was performed. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 212
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   The functions of multiple representations [J].
Ainsworth, S .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 1999, 33 (2-3) :131-152
[2]   DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations [J].
Ainsworth, Shaaron .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2006, 16 (03) :183-198
[3]   Recent advances in augmented reality [J].
Azuma, R ;
Baillot, Y ;
Behringer, R ;
Feiner, S ;
Julier, S ;
MacIntyre, B .
IEEE COMPUTER GRAPHICS AND APPLICATIONS, 2001, 21 (06) :34-47
[4]  
Betrancourt M., 2005, The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, P287, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511816819.019, 10.1017/CBO9780511816819.019]
[5]   Cognitive activities in complex science text and diagrams [J].
Cromley, Jennifer G. ;
Snyder-Hogan, Lindsey E. ;
Luciw-Dubas, Ulana A. .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 35 (01) :59-74
[6]   Designing augmented reality for the classroom [J].
Cuendet, Sebastien ;
Bonnard, Quentin ;
Do-Lenh, Son ;
Dillenbourg, Pierre .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2013, 68 :557-569
[7]  
Hegarty M, 2008, LEARNING WITH ANIMATION: RESEARCH IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGN, P3
[8]  
Kesim M, 2012, PROCEDIA SOCIAL BEHA, V47, P207
[9]   Can differences in learning strategies explain the benefits of learning from static and dynamic visualizations? [J].
Kuehl, Tim ;
Scheiter, Katharina ;
Gerjets, Peter ;
Gemballa, Sven .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2011, 56 (01) :176-187
[10]  
Mayer RE, 2009, MULTIMEDIA LEARNING, 2ND EDITION, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511811678