GIS-based seismic vulnerability mapping: a comparison of artificial neural networks hybrid models

被引:12
作者
Yariyan, Peyman [1 ]
Ali Abbaspour, Rahim [2 ]
Chehreghan, Alireza [3 ]
Karami, MohammadReza [4 ]
Cerda, Artemi [5 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Surveying Engn, Saghez Branch, Saghez, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran, Coll Engn, Sch Surveying & Geospatial Engn, Tehran, Iran
[3] Sahand Univ Technol, Fac Min Engn, Tabriz, Iran
[4] Payame Noor Univ, Dept Social Sci, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Tehran, Iran
[5] Univ Valencia, Soil Eros & Degradat Res Grp Dept Geog, Dept Geog, Valencia, Spain
关键词
Seismic vulnerability mapping; artificial neural network; hybrid models; GIS; Iran; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEMS; NATURAL DISASTERS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; CLASSIFICATION; EARTHQUAKES; REGION; TREES;
D O I
10.1080/10106049.2021.1892208
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Earthquake hazards cause changes in landforms, economic losses, and human casualties. Seismic Vulnerability Mapping (SVM) is key information to prevent and predict the damage of earthquakes. The purpose of this study is to train and compare the results of the Classification Tree Analysis (CTA) learner model with three Gini, Entropy, Ratio split algorithms, and Fuzzy ARTMAP (FAM) model by the development of hybrid models for SVM. The Seismic Vulnerability Conditioning Factors (SVCFs) such as environmental, physical, and social were selected using experts' opinions and experience. Thirteen factors were edited and prepared as the seismic vulnerability conditioning factors (SVCFs) used in this study. In order to seismic vulnerability mapping and models training, a database of training sites was created by the Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis-Multi-Criteria Evaluation (MCDA-MCE) hybrid process. Then, 70% of the points were used for training and 30% were used to validate the models' results based on the holdout method. Moreover, Relative Operating Characteristics (ROC), Seismic Relative Index (SRI), and Frequency Ratio (FR) were used to validate the results. The Area under the curve (AUC) for the algorithms Gini, Entropy, Ratio, and FAM model are 0.895, 0.890, 0.876, and 0.783, respectively. The results of the three validation methods show the highest performance for the Gini splitting algorithm. Accordingly, the percentage of social and physical vulnerability of Sanandaj city was determined based on the MCE-Gini optimal model: 27% of the area and 62% of the population of Sanandaj are under high vulnerability to earthquakes. So that, various factors such as worn urban texture, high population density and environmental factors were among the most important factors affecting seismic vulnerability.
引用
收藏
页码:4312 / 4335
页数:24
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] Effect of Damping Modeling and Characteristics on Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Multi-Frame Bridges
    Abbasi, Mohammad
    Moustafa, Mohamed A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 25 (08) : 1616 - 1643
  • [2] Possibility of Groundwater Pollution in Halabja Saidsadiq Hydrogeological Basin, Iraq Using Modified DRASTIC Model Based on AHP and Tritium Isotopes
    Abdullah, Twana O.
    Ali, Salahalddin S.
    Al-Ansari, Nadhir A.
    Knutsson, Sven
    [J]. GEOSCIENCES, 2018, 8 (07)
  • [3] Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of southern part of Ghana
    Ahulu, Sylvanus T.
    Danuor, Sylvester Kojo
    Asiedu, Daniel K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2018, 22 (03) : 539 - 557
  • [4] Al-Dogom D., 2018, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. ISPRS Arch, V42, P29, DOI [10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W4-29-2018, DOI 10.5194/ISPRS-ARCHIVES-XLII-3-W4-29-2018]
  • [5] Alam M. S., 2018, J GEOSCI ENV PROT, V6, P165, DOI [DOI 10.4236/GEP.2018.62011, 10.4236/gep.2018.62011]
  • [6] Geomorphology, natural hazards, vulnerability and prevention of natural disasters in developing countries
    Alcántara-Ayala, I
    [J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2002, 47 (2-4) : 107 - 124
  • [7] A cluster-based decision support system for estimating earthquake damage and casualties
    Aleskerov, F
    Iseri Say, A
    Toker, A
    Akin, HL
    Altay, G
    [J]. DISASTERS, 2005, 29 (03) : 255 - 276
  • [8] A Hybrid Analytic Network Process and Artificial Neural Network (ANP-ANN) Model for Urban Earthquake Vulnerability Assessment
    Alizadeh, Mohsen
    Ngah, Ibrahim
    Hashim, Mazlan
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Pour, Amin Beiranvand
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (06)
  • [9] Armas I, 2014, ENVIR HAZARD, P127, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7981-5_7
  • [10] Seismic vulnerability assessment of urban buildings and traffic networks using fuzzy ordered weighted average
    Asadi, Yasaman
    Samany, Najmeh Neysani
    Ezimand, Keyvan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE, 2019, 16 (03) : 677 - 688