Consistency influences altered auditory feedback processing

被引:14
作者
Franken, Matthias K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Acheson, Daniel J. [1 ,2 ]
McQueen, James M. [1 ]
Hagoort, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Eisner, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Ghent, Dept Expt Psychol, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Speech production; formants; speech-motor control; sensorimotor integration; SENSORIMOTOR ADAPTATION; RESPONSES; PITCH; COMPENSATION; FREQUENCY; ERROR;
D O I
10.1177/1747021819838939
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous research on the effect of perturbed auditory feedback in speech production has focused on two types of responses. In the short term, speakers generate compensatory motor commands in response to unexpected perturbations. In the longer term, speakers adapt feedforward motor programmes in response to feedback perturbations, to avoid future errors. The current study investigated the relation between these two types of responses to altered auditory feedback. Specifically, it was hypothesised that consistency in previous feedback perturbations would influence whether speakers adapt their feedforward motor programmes. In an altered auditory feedback paradigm, formant perturbations were applied either across all trials (the consistent condition) or only to some trials, whereas the others remained unperturbed (the inconsistent condition). The results showed that speakers' responses were affected by feedback consistency, with stronger speech changes in the consistent condition compared with the inconsistent condition. Current models of speech-motor control can explain this consistency effect. However, the data also suggest that compensation and adaptation are distinct processes, which are not in line with all current models.
引用
收藏
页码:2371 / 2379
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   The Neural Feedback Response to Error As a Teaching Signal for the Motor Learning System [J].
Albert, Scott T. ;
Shadmehr, Reza .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 36 (17) :4832-4845
[2]   Fast and Elegant Numerical Linear Algebra Using the RcppEigen Package [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Eddelbuettel, Dirk .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2013, 52 (05) :1-24
[3]   Voice F-0 responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback: A preliminary study [J].
Burnett, TA ;
Senner, JE ;
Larson, CR .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 1997, 11 (02) :202-211
[4]   Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback [J].
Burnett, TA ;
Freedland, MB ;
Larson, CR ;
Hain, TC .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1998, 103 (06) :3153-3161
[5]  
Cai S., 2008, 8 INT SEM SPEECH PRO, P65
[6]   Weak Responses to Auditory Feedback Perturbation during Articulation in Persons Who Stutter: Evidence for Abnormal Auditory-Motor Transformation [J].
Cai, Shanqing ;
Beal, Deryk S. ;
Ghosh, Satrajit S. ;
Tiede, Mark K. ;
Guenther, Frank H. ;
Perkell, Joseph S. .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (07)
[7]   Environmental Consistency Determines the Rate of Motor Adaptation [J].
Castro, Luis Nicolas Gonzalez ;
Hadjiosif, Alkis M. ;
Hemphill, Matthew A. ;
Smith, Maurice A. .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (10) :1050-1061
[9]   Opposing and following responses in sensorimotor speech control: Why responses go both ways [J].
Franken, Matthias K. ;
Acheson, Daniel J. ;
McQueen, James M. ;
Hagoort, Peter ;
Eisner, Frank .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2018, 25 (04) :1458-1467
[10]   Computational Mechanisms of Sensorimotor Control [J].
Franklin, David W. ;
Wolpert, Daniel M. .
NEURON, 2011, 72 (03) :425-442