Clinician-patient communication: evidence-based recommendations to guide practice in cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Rodin, G. [1 ]
Zimmermann, C. [2 ]
Mayer, C. [3 ,4 ]
Howell, D.
Katz, M. [5 ]
Sussman, J. [6 ]
Mackay, J. A. [7 ]
Brouwers, M. [8 ]
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Hosp, Dept Psychosocial Oncol & Palliat Care, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[2] Princess Margaret Hosp, Palliat Care Serv, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[3] Sudbury Reg Hosp, Support Care Oncol Res Unit, Support Care Program, Sudbury, ON, Canada
[4] Sudbury Reg Hosp, Hop Reg, Reg Canc Program, Sudbury Genet Counselling Serv, Sudbury, ON, Canada
[5] Southlake Reg Hlth Ctr, Newmarket, ON, Canada
[6] McMaster Univ, Support Canc Care Res Unit, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Hlth Informat Res Unit, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[8] Canc Care Ontario Program Evidence Based Care, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
Practice guideline; systematic review; cancer; communication; relationships; DEVELOPMENT CYCLE; ONCOLOGY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Goals of Work To develop recommendations for effective communication between cancer health care providers and patients based on a systematic review of methods of clinician-patient Communication that may affect patient outcomes associated with distress at critical points in the course of cancer care. Materials and Methods Asystematic review of the literature was conducted, and evidence-based recommendations were formulated to guide clinician-patient communication in cancer care. A formal external review was conducted to validate the relevance of these recommendations. Main Results Recommendations for communication in cancer care are presented, based on guidelines from the Australian National Breast Cancer Centre and the Australian National Cancer Control Initiative, an updated systematic review of the research evidence, and a consensus by the Clinician-Patient Communications Working Panel of the Program in Evidence-Based Care of Cancer Care Ontario. The recommendations were sent to 110 Ontario practitioners for external review: 33 responded (30% response rate). Most of these respondents (87%) agreed with the draft recommendations and approved of their use as a practice guideline (90%). A condensed version of the recommendations, including 10 key points, was also created. Conclusions There is evidence to support general clinician-patient communication approaches, although the preferences of cancer patients regarding such communication exhibit individual and cultural variability. Recommendations are provided, based on evidence, the consensus of an expert panel, and feedback from a survey of external practitioners. Evidence evaluating the role of decision aids and strategies to facilitate better communication is inconsistent, although such tools may be of value for some patients.
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 405
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evidence-based analysis of physical therapy in Parkinson's disease with recommendations for practice and research
    Keus, Samyra H. J.
    Bloem, Bastiaan R.
    Hendriks, Erik J. M.
    Bredero-Cohen, Alexandra B.
    Munneke, Marten
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2007, 22 (04) : 451 - 460
  • [32] Quality, methods, and recommendations of systematic reviews on measures of evidence-based practice: an umbrella review
    Roberge-Dao, Jacqueline
    Maggio, Lauren A.
    Zaccagnini, Marco
    Rochette, Annie
    Shikako-Thomas, Keiko
    Boruff, Jill
    Thomas, Aliki
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (04) : 1004 - 1073
  • [33] Facilitating Detachment From Work: A Systematic Review, Evidence-Based Recommendations, and Guide for Future Research
    Agolli, Anastasiia
    Holtz, Brian C.
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 28 (03) : 129 - 159
  • [34] An evidence-based review of Yoga as a complementary intervention for patients with cancer
    Smith, Kelly B.
    Pukall, Caroline F.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2009, 18 (05) : 465 - 475
  • [35] Evidence-based recommendations for blinding in surgical trials
    Pascal Probst
    Steffen Zaschke
    Patrick Heger
    Julian C. Harnoss
    Felix J. Hüttner
    André L. Mihaljevic
    Phillip Knebel
    Markus K. Diener
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2019, 404 : 273 - 284
  • [36] Evidence-based recommendations for blinding in surgical trials
    Probst, Pascal
    Zaschke, Steffen
    Heger, Patrick
    Harnoss, Julian C.
    Huettner, Felix J.
    Mihaljevic, Andre L.
    Knebel, Phillip
    Diener, Markus K.
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2019, 404 (03) : 273 - 284
  • [37] The different faces of empathy in cancer care: From a desired virtue to an evidence-based communication process
    van Vliet, Liesbeth M.
    Back, Anthony L.
    CANCER, 2021, 127 (22) : 4137 - 4139
  • [38] Operationalizing evidence-based practice: The development of an institute for evidence-based social work
    Regehr, Cheryl
    Stern, Susan
    Shlonsky, Aron
    RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2007, 17 (03) : 408 - 416
  • [39] Evidence-Based Practice Functional Rhinoplasty
    Cannon, Daniel E.
    Rhee, John S.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 45 (05) : 1033 - +
  • [40] Methodological innovations to strengthen evidence-based serious illness communication
    Sanders, Justin J.
    Blanch-Hartigan, Danielle
    Ericson, Jonathan
    Tarbi, Elise
    Rizzo, Donna
    Gramling, Robert
    van Vliet, Liesbeth
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2023, 114