Medication information for Flemish inpatients with major depression: evaluation and construct validity of the Consumer Information Rating Form

被引:5
|
作者
Desplenter, F. [1 ]
Laekeman, G. [1 ]
Demyttenaere, K. [2 ]
Simoens, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Res Ctr Pharmaceut Care & Pharmacoecon, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Neurosci & Psychiat, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
关键词
consumer information rating form; major depression; pamphlet; patient education; written patient information; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; LEAFLETS; READABILITY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2710.2009.01039.x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
P>Background and objectives: Evaluating the quality of written medication information is a major topic of concern when patient pamphlets are developed. The objective of this study is to evaluate a patient pamphlet on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) by calculating Flesch-Douma readability scores and by applying the Consumer Information Rating Form (CIRF) to Flemish inpatients with major depression taking SSRIs. Methods: The pamphlet was evaluated by calculating Flesch-Douma readability scores. The study enrolled patients with major depression taking SSRIs. Patient received a SSRI pamphlet and completed a self-administered structured questionnaire consisting of the adapted CIRF and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Construct validity was explored by means of factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha. Results and discussion: The Flesch-Douma readability scores showed that the pamphlet was easy to read, had much interest in the reader and was very popular. The sample of 96 patients consisted of doubtful/definite cases in terms of anxiety (10 center dot 65 +/- 4 center dot 90) and doubtful cases in terms of depression (8 center dot 91 +/- 5 center dot 23). Using the CIRF, patients assigned positive scores to comprehensibility, utility and design quality of the pamphlet. Factor analysis on the original CIRF confirmed the three original factors (P < 0 center dot 001). Cronbach's alpha of factors ranged from 0 center dot 69 to 0 center dot 83. Conclusion: The SSRI pamphlet is of good quality. Our study supported the construct validity of the CIRF to Flemish inpatients with major depression.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 655
页数:11
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Evaluation of written medicine information: Validation of the consumer information rating form
    Koo, Michelle M.
    Krass, Ines
    Aslani, Parisa
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2007, 41 (06) : 951 - 956
  • [2] Development and psychometric validation for evaluating written medicine information in Thailand: The Consumer Information Rating Form
    Wongtaweepkij, Kamonphat
    Krska, Janet
    Pongwecharak, Juraporn
    Pongpunna, Supawinee
    Jarernsiripornkul, Narumol
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (10):
  • [3] Evaluation of online consumer medication information
    Kim, Karissa Y.
    Metzger, Anne
    Wigle, Patricia R.
    Choe, Pearl J.
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2011, 7 (02) : 202 - 207
  • [4] Evaluation of the Preliminary Validity of Misuse of Prescription Pain Medication Items from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)®
    You, Dokyoung Sophia
    Hah, Jennifer M.
    Collins, Sophie
    Ziadni, Maisa S.
    Domingue, Ben W.
    Cook, Karon F.
    Mackey, Sean C.
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2019, 20 (10) : 1925 - 1933