Assessment of spatial uncertainty of heavy rainfall at catchment scale using a dense gauge network

被引:21
|
作者
Sungmin, O. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Foelsche, Ulrich [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Graz Univ, NAWI Graz, Inst Phys, Inst Geophys Astrophys & Meteorol, Graz, Austria
[2] Graz Univ, FWF DK Climate Change, Graz, Austria
[3] Graz Univ, Wegener Ctr Climate & Global Change WEGC, Graz, Austria
[4] Max Planck Inst Biogeochem, Biogeochem Integrat, Jena, Germany
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
GRIDDED DAILY PRECIPITATION; VARIABILITY; RADAR; VALIDATION; WEGENERNET; WEATHER;
D O I
10.5194/hess-23-2863-2019
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Hydrology and remote-sensing communities have made use of dense rain-gauge networks for studying rainfall uncertainty and variability. However, in most regions, these dense networks are only available at small spatial scales (e.g., within remote-sensing subpixel areas) and over short periods of time. Just a few studies have applied a similar approach, i.e., employing dense gauge networks to catchment-scale areas, which limits the verification of their results in other regions. Using 10-year rainfall measurements from a network of 150 rain gauges, WegenerNet (WEGN), we assess the spatial uncertainty in observed heavy rainfall events. The WEGN network is located in southeastern Austria over an area of 20 km x 15 km with moderate orography. First, the spatial variability in rainfall in the region was characterized using a correlogram at daily and sub-daily scales. Differences in the spatial structure of rainfall events between warm and cold seasons are apparent, and we selected heavy rainfall events, the upper 10 % of wettest days during the warm season, for further analyses because of their high potential for causing hazards. Secondly, we investigated the uncertainty in estimating mean areal rainfall arising from a limited gauge density. The average number of gauges required to obtain areal rainfall with errors less than a certain threshold (<= 20 % normalized root-mean-square error - RMSE - is considered here) tends to increase, roughly following a power law as the timescale decreases, while the errors can be significantly reduced by establishing regularly distributed gauges. Lastly, the impact of spatial aggregation on extreme rainfall was examined, using gridded rainfall data with various horizontal grid spacings. The spatial-scale dependence was clearly observed at high intensity thresholds and high temporal resolutions; e.g., the 5 min extreme intensity increases by 44 % for the 99.9th and by 25 % for the 99th percentile, with increasing horizontal resolution from 0.1 to 0.01 degrees. Quantitative uncertainty information from this study can guide both data users and producers to estimate uncertainty in their own observational datasets, consequently leading to the sensible use of the data in relevant applications. Our findings could be transferred to midlatitude regions with moderate topography, but only to a limited extent, given that regional factors that can affect rainfall type and process are not explicitly considered in the study.
引用
收藏
页码:2863 / 2875
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Analysis of rainfall and large-scale predictors using a stochastic model and artificial neural network for hydrological applications in southern Africa
    Kenabatho, P. K.
    Parida, B. P.
    Moalafhi, D. B.
    Segosebe, T.
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2015, 60 (11): : 1943 - 1955
  • [42] Assessment of spatial uncertainty for delineating optimal soil sampling sites in rubber tree management using sequential indicator simulation
    Lin Qing-Huo
    Li Hong
    Li Bao-Guo
    Guo Peng-Tao
    Luo Wei
    Lin Zhao-Mu
    INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2016, 91 : 231 - 237
  • [43] Assessment of the potential impacts of climate change on the hydrology at catchment scale: modelling approach including prediction of future drought events using drought indices
    Afzal, M.
    Ragab, R.
    APPLIED WATER SCIENCE, 2020, 10 (10)
  • [44] Spatial Distribution and Mobility Assessment of Carcinogenic Heavy Metals in Soil Profiles Using Geostatistics and Random Forest, Boruta Algorithm
    Shaheen, Asma
    Iqbal, Javed
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (03):
  • [45] Comprehensive evaluation of multi-satellite precipitation products with a dense rain gauge network and optimally merging their simulated hydrological flows using the Bayesian model averaging method
    Jiang, Shanhu
    Ren, Liliang
    Hong, Yang
    Yong, Bin
    Yang, Xiaoli
    Yuan, Fei
    Ma, Mingwei
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2012, 452 : 213 - 225
  • [46] Assessment of Satellite-Based Rainfall Products Using a X-Band Rain Radar Network in the Complex Terrain of the Ecuadorian Andes
    Turini, Nazli
    Thies, Boris
    Rollenbeck, Ruetger
    Fries, Andreas
    Pucha-Cofrep, Franz
    Orellana-Alvear, Johanna
    Horna, Natalia
    Bendix, Joerg
    ATMOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (12)
  • [47] Uncertainty assessment in aboveground biomass estimation at the regional scale using a new method considering both sampling error and model error
    Fu, Yu
    Lei, Yuancai
    Zeng, Weisheng
    Hao, Ruijun
    Zhang, Guilian
    Zhong, Qicheng
    Xu, Mingshan
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2017, 47 (08) : 1095 - 1103
  • [48] Assessment of rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility at the regional scale using a physically based model and fuzzy-based Monte Carlo simulation
    Park, Hyuck Jin
    Jang, Jung Yoon
    Lee, Jung Hyun
    LANDSLIDES, 2019, 16 (04) : 695 - 713
  • [49] Assessment of probability of failure on rainfall-induced shallow landslides at slope scale using a physical-based model and fuzzy point estimate method
    Yang, Ya-Sin
    Yeh, Hsin-Fu
    Ke, Chien-Chung
    Chen, Nai-Chin
    Chang, Kuo-Chin
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [50] Data-based bivariate uncertainty assessment of extreme rainfall-runoff using copulas: comparison between annual maximum series (AMS) and peaks over threshold (POT)
    Dodangeh, Esmaeel
    Shahedi, Kaka
    Solaimani, Karim
    Shiau, Jenq-Tzong
    Abraham, John
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2019, 191 (02)