Impact of an electronic health record transition on chemotherapy error reporting

被引:4
|
作者
Hess, Elizabeth [1 ]
Palmer, Shannon E. [2 ]
Stivers, Andrew [3 ]
Amerine, Lindsey B. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UK HealthCare, Medicat Safety & Qual, Lexington, KY USA
[2] UNC Eshelman Sch Pharm, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Emory Univ, Hosp Midtown, Medicat Use & Safety, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Med Ctr, Dept Pharm, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
关键词
Chemotherapy; electronic health record; error reporting; medication errors; PRESCRIBER-ORDER-ENTRY; PATIENT SAFETY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1177/1078155219870590
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Incident reporting systems allow for frontline employees to report errors and are a critical component of healthcare patient safety programs. Although incident reporting systems cannot quantify total errors, organizations can utilize incident reporting systems to help identify risks and trends to act upon. The objective of this article is to utilize incident reporting systems to evaluate trends in medication error reporting before and after implementation of a new electronic health record system. Methods: A five-month pre- and post-analysis was completed in a cancer hospital following electronic health record conversion by reviewing medication errors reported via the institution's voluntary incident reporting systems. Error reports included medication error category, date error was reported/occurred, patient location at time of error, harm severity score, medication(s) involved, medication use system node error originated/discovered in, medication source, narrative summary, and contributing factors. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics within Office Excel. Results: Oncology medication error reports submitted pre- and post-electronic health record were 68 vs. 57, respectively. During the pre- and post-electronic health record conversion, a majority of errors had a harm severity index of 0 or 1; 12 (18%) in pre-electronic health record and 3 (5%) in post-electronic health record were level 2, and one (1%) in pre-electronic health record vs. 0 in post-electronic health record were level 3. Reported medication errors originated most commonly during the prescribing, administration, and preparation/dispensing phase and were primarily identified in the administration phase of the medication use process. The most frequently reported error category was 'wrong dose' followed by 'other' and 'overdose' in the pre-electronic health record phase and 'missing dose/delayed delivery' and 'order incorrect' in the post-electronic health record phase. The most frequently reported medications included methotrexate, chemotherapy (unspecified), and cisplatin. Conclusion: Analyzing data from incident reporting system reports allowed our institution to understand different trends of reporting in the cancer hospital following electronic health record adoption. Utilization of incident reporting systems must be combined with proactive risk identification approaches to enable systems-focused improvements to improve patient safety.
引用
收藏
页码:787 / 793
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Electronic Health Record as an eHaaS Electronic Health Record as a Service. Software in the Cloud
    Villa, Luis Bernardo
    Cabezas, Ivan
    Cruz, Juan
    2015 10TH COMPUTING COLOMBIAN CONFERENCE (10CCC), 2015, : 543 - 550
  • [22] The long-term financial impact of electronic health record implementation
    Howley, Michael J.
    Chou, Edgar Y.
    Hansen, Nancy
    Dalrymple, Prudence W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2015, 22 (02) : 443 - 452
  • [23] The Evolution of the Electronic Health Record
    Doyle-Lindrud, Susan
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2015, 19 (02) : 153 - 154
  • [24] Rebooting the Electronic Health Record
    Zhang, Erik J.
    Tan, Heng
    Sanford, Joseph A.
    Michelson, James D.
    Waldschmidt, Brian M.
    Tsai, Mitchell H.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2022, 46 (07)
  • [25] Rebooting the Electronic Health Record
    Erik J. Zhang
    Heng Tan
    Joseph A. Sanford
    James D. Michelson
    Brian M. Waldschmidt
    Mitchell H. Tsai
    Journal of Medical Systems, 46
  • [26] Secondary use of electronic health record data: spontaneous triggered adverse drug event reporting
    Linder, Jeffrey A.
    Haas, Jennifer S.
    Iyer, Aarthi
    Labuzetta, Michael A.
    Ibara, Michael
    Celeste, Michael
    Getty, George
    Bates, David W.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2010, 19 (12) : 1211 - 1215
  • [27] Electronic Health Record - Enabled Research in Children Using the Electronic Health Record for Clinical Discovery
    Sutherland, Scott M.
    Kaelber, David C.
    Downing, N. Lance
    Goel, Veena V.
    Longhurst, Christopher A.
    PEDIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2016, 63 (02) : 251 - +
  • [28] Electronic Health Record: A review
    Grana, Manuel
    Lackwoski, Konrad
    PROCEEDINGS 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICINE, 2015, : 1375 - 1382
  • [29] Problems with the electronic health record
    de Ruiter, Hans-Peter
    Liaschenko, Joan
    Angus, Jan
    NURSING PHILOSOPHY, 2016, 17 (01) : 49 - 58
  • [30] Further steps for parenteral nutrition in the electronic health record
    Sanchez, John Patrick G.
    Canada, Todd W.
    Vanek, Vincent W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2018, 75 (23) : 1856 - +