Indexing soil quality: a new paradigm in soil science research

被引:54
作者
Erkossa, Teklu
Itanna, Fisseha
Stahr, Karl
机构
[1] Debre Zeit Res Ctr, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia
[2] Univ Addis Ababa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
[3] Univ Hohenheim, Inst Soil Sci & Land Evaluat, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
来源
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH | 2007年 / 45卷 / 02期
关键词
soil quality indicators; land preparation methods; Vertisols; Ethiopia;
D O I
10.1071/SR06064
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Soil quality indexing is a new approach in spatial and temporal evaluation of land management systems effects on soils' capacity to function. A field experiment was conducted at Caffee Doonsa (2400m.a.s.l., 08 degrees 57'N, 39 degrees 06'E) for 6 years (1998-2003) to compare the effects of land preparation methods on soil quality (SQ) and to test the use of the Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF) in assessing SQ under the Ethiopian Central Highlands conditions. Four methods of land preparation [ broad bed and furrows (BBF), green manure (GM), ridge and furrows (RF), and reduced tillage (RT)] were arranged in a randomised complete block design with 3 replications on permanent plots (22m by 6 m). Physical, chemical, and biological SQ indicators were determined and scored, and a soil quality index (SQI) was developed using the SMAF procedures. Seven SQ indicators including microbial biomass carbon (MBC), bulk density, aggregate stability (AGG), soil organic carbon (Corg), pH, available water capacity (AWC), and available phosphorus were selected as a minimum dataset. The scored values of the indicators ranged from 0.21 for AGG and 0.97 for pH, both under BBF. Compared with RF ( control), all the alternatives ( GM, BBF, and RT) increased the scores of Corg and MBC. Moreover, BBF and GM increased the score values of AWC and AGG, respectively. Consequently, there was a non-significant increase in SQI due to the use of GM, BBF, and RT compared with the control. As a result, the land preparation methods may be preferred in a decreasing order GM=BBF=RT=RF for the management goal of crop production. The study indicated that SMAF could be a robust tool to assess the performance of land management methods on soil quality in the study area, but some modi. cations may be required to. fit to the prevailing cropping system and soil characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 137
页数:9
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   PHYSIOLOGICAL METHOD FOR QUANTITATIVE MEASUREMENT OF MICROBIAL BIOMASS IN SOILS [J].
ANDERSON, JPE ;
DOMSCH, KH .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1978, 10 (03) :215-221
[2]   A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California [J].
Andrews, SS ;
Karlen, DL ;
Mitchell, JP .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 90 (01) :25-45
[3]  
Andrews SS, 2001, ECOL APPL, V11, P1573, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1573:DASQAT]2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   The soil management assessment framework: A quantitative soil quality evaluation method [J].
Andrews, SS ;
Karlen, DL ;
Cambardella, CA .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2004, 68 (06) :1945-1962
[6]   On-farm assessment of soil quality in California's central valley [J].
Andrews, SS ;
Mitchell, JP ;
Mancinelli, R ;
Karlen, DL ;
Hartz, TK ;
Horwath, WR ;
Pettygrove, GS ;
Scow, KM ;
Munk, DS .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2002, 94 (01) :12-23
[7]  
[Anonymous], ENV IMPROVEMENT AGR
[8]  
[Anonymous], P C HELD INT LIV CTR
[9]  
Arshad MA, 1996, SSSA SPECIAL PUBLICA, V49, P123, DOI DOI 10.2136/SSSASPECPUB49.C7
[10]  
ASNAKEW WA, 1991, WHEAT RES ETHIOPIA H, P27