Model test and discrete element method simulation of shield tunneling face stability in transparent clay

被引:26
作者
Lei, Huayang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Yajie [1 ]
Hu, Yao [1 ]
Liu, Yingnan [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Coast Civil Struct Safety, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Univ, Key Lab Earthquake Engn Simulat & Seism Resilienc, China Earthquake Adm, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
关键词
shield tunneling face; stability; transparent clay; model test; numerical simulation;
D O I
10.1007/s11709-020-0704-6
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The stability of the shield tunneling face is an extremely important factor affecting the safety of tunnel construction. In this study, a transparent clay with properties similar to those of Tianjin clay is prepared and a new transparent clay model test apparatus is developed to overcome the "black box" problem in the traditional model test. The stability of the shield tunneling face (failure mode, influence range, support force, and surface settlement) is investigated in transparent clay under active failure. A series of transparent clay model tests is performed to investigate the active failure mode, influence range, and support force of the shield tunneling face under different burial depth conditions, whereas particle flow code three-dimensional numerical simulations are conducted to verify the failure mode of the shield tunneling face and surface settlement along the transverse section under different burial depth conditions. The results show that the engineering characteristics of transparent clay are similar to those of soft clay in Binhai, Tianjin and satisfy visibility requirements. Two types of failure modes are obtained: the overall failure mode (cover/diameter: C/D <= 1.0) and local failure mode (C/D > 2.0). The influence range of the transverse section is wider than that of the longitudinal section when C/D > 2.0. Additionally, the normalized thresholds of the relative displacement and support force ratio are 3%-6% and 0.2-0.4, respectively. Owing to the cushioning effect of the clay layer, the surface settlement is significantly reduced as the tunnel burial depth increases.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 166
页数:20
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Evaluation of tunnel face stability by transparent soil models
    Ahmed, Mahmoud
    Iskander, Magued
    [J]. TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 27 (01) : 101 - 110
  • [2] Belter B., 1999, BAUINGENIEUR, V74, P1
  • [3] Bennermark H, 1967, J SOIL MECH FDN DIV, V96, P71, DOI [10.1061/JSFEAQ.0000946, DOI 10.1061/JSFEAQ.0000946]
  • [4] Load behaviour of model strip footings on reinforced transparent soils
    Chen, J-F
    Guo, X-P
    Xue, J-F
    Guo, P-H
    [J]. GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 26 (03) : 251 - 260
  • [5] Prediction of shield tunneling-induced ground settlement using machine learning techniques
    Chen, Renpeng
    Zhang, Pin
    Wu, Huaina
    Wang, Zhiteng
    Zhong, Zhiquan
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF STRUCTURAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2019, 13 (06) : 1363 - 1378
  • [6] [陈仁朋 Chen Renpeng], 2011, [岩土工程学报, Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering], V33, P117
  • [7] THE STABILITY OF SHALLOW TUNNELS AND UNDERGROUND OPENINGS IN COHESIVE MATERIAL
    DAVIS, EH
    GUNN, MJ
    MAIR, RJ
    SENEVIRATNE, HN
    [J]. GEOTECHNIQUE, 1980, 30 (04): : 397 - 416
  • [8] Laboratory-scale model studies on corduroy-reinforced road embankments on peat foundations using transparent soil
    De Guzman, Earl Marvin B.
    Alfaro, Marolo C.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS, 2018, 16 : 1 - 10
  • [9] Experimental investigation of the time-dependent response of unreinforced and reinforced tunnel faces in cohesive soils
    di Prisco, Claudio
    Flessati, Luca
    Frigerio, Gabriele
    Castellanza, Riccardo
    Caruso, Marco
    Galli, Andrea
    Lunardi, Pietro
    [J]. ACTA GEOTECHNICA, 2018, 13 (03) : 651 - 670
  • [10] Greenfield tunnelling in sands: the effects of soil density and relative depth
    Franza, A.
    Marshall, A. M.
    Zhou, B.
    [J]. GEOTECHNIQUE, 2019, 69 (04): : 297 - 307