Practical matters, rather than lack of trust, motivate non-participation in a long-term cohort trial

被引:14
作者
Helgesson, Gert [1 ]
Hansson, Mats G. [2 ]
Ludvigsson, Johnny [3 ,4 ]
Swartling, Ulrica [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept LIME, Stockholm Ctr Healthcare Eth, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Caring Sci, Ctr Res Eth & Bioeth, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Div Paediat, Linkoping, Sweden
[4] Linkoping Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Ctr Diabet, Linkoping, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
cohort trial; ethics; long-term; non-participation; trust; CHOICE; CANCER; IMPACT; RATES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-5448.2008.00498.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the importance of trust in researchers and other reasons that participating parents, former participants, and non-participants had for participating, or not participating, in a longitudinal cohort study on prediction and development of diabetes in children. Study design: A questionnaire addressing each of these groups, where respondents graded the importance of a set of listed reasons for participating/not participating, was randomly distributed to 2500 families in the All Babies in Southeast Sweden (ABIS) Study region with children born between 1997 and 1999. Results: Lack of trust was not a central Factor to a great majority of respondents who decided not to participate in the ABIS study or who later decided to opt out. Practical matters, like blood sampling and lack of time, were important factors to many more. Yet, four fifths of those who still participate in the ABIS study stated trust in the researchers to be an important factor to their initial decision to participate. Conclusions: Trust in researchers may be a necessary prerequisite in order for people to be willing to participate in research, but practical matters such as time that has to be spent or pain involved in collecting blood were more important factors than lack of trust in explaining opt Out in relation to the ABIS study.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 412
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review [J].
Broadstock, M ;
Michie, S ;
Marteau, T .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2000, 8 (10) :731-738
[2]   Social patterning of screening uptake and the impact of facilitating informed choices: Psychological and ethical analyses [J].
Crockett, Rachel ;
Wilkinson, Timothy M. ;
Marteau, Theresa M. .
HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS, 2008, 16 (01) :17-30
[3]   Building on relationships of trust in biobank research [J].
Hansson, MG .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2005, 31 (07) :415-418
[4]   The right to withdraw consent to research on biobank samples [J].
Helgesson G. ;
Johnsson L. .
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2005, 8 (3) :315-321
[5]   Evaluation of an informed choice invitation for type 2 diabetes screening [J].
Kellar, Ian ;
Sutton, Stephen ;
Griffin, Simon ;
Prevost, A. Toby ;
Kinmonth, Ann Louise ;
Marteau, Theresa M. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2008, 72 (02) :232-238
[6]  
Ludvigsson J, 2001, Pediatr Diabetes, V2, P170, DOI 10.1034/j.1399-5448.2001.20405.x
[7]   Drop-out rates of cancer patients participating in longitudinal RCTs [J].
Mathibe, Lehlohonolo J. .
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2007, 28 (04) :340-342
[8]   Coping style, psychological distress, risk perception, and satisfaction in subjects attending genetic counselling for hereditary cancer [J].
Nordin, K ;
Lidén, A ;
Hansson, M ;
Rosenquist, R ;
Berglund, G .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2002, 39 (09) :689-694
[9]  
ONEILL A, 2002, AUTONORNY TRUST BIOE
[10]  
Stromsvik Nina, 2007, J Genet Couns, V16, P105, DOI 10.1007/s10897-006-9047-2