The Value of Intraoperative Histology in Predicting Infection in Patients Undergoing Revision Elbow Arthroplasty

被引:8
作者
Ahmadi, Shahryar [1 ]
Lawrence, Thomas M. [1 ]
Morrey, Bernard F. [1 ]
Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Orthoped Surg, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
FROZEN-SECTION; HIP;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.L.00409
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The perioperative diagnosis of infection in the setting of revision elbow arthroplasty may be difficult to establish. Intraoperative pathology with histology for identification of acute inflammatory changes has been reported to be of value in revision surgery after failed hip or knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to study the role of intraoperative histology in the diagnosis of infection in patients undergoing revision elbow arthroplasty. Methods: From 2000 to 2007, 296 consecutive revision elbow procedures were performed at our institution. Both intraoperative histology and operative samples for culture were obtained at the time of 227 of these procedures, which form the basis of this study. Results: Histology was read as consistent with acute inflammation in patients undergoing thirty-three procedures (14.5%). Intraoperative cultures were positive in thirty-nine procedures (17.2%). Intraoperative histology was considered true positive (both histology and cultures positive) in twenty arthroplasties (8.8%), true negative (both histology and cultures were negative) in 175 arthroplasties (77.1%), false positive (the histology was positive but the culture was negative) in thirteen arthroplasties (5.7%), and false negative (the histology was negative but the culture was positive) in nineteen arthroplasties (8.4%). With regard to intraoperative histology, the sensitivity was 51.3%, the specificity was 93.1%, and the accuracy was 85.9%. The positive predictive value was 60.6% and the negative predictive value was 90.2%. Conclusions: In our study, intraoperative histology had a high specificity and negative predictive value, but a low sensitivity and positive predictive value for predicting infection in the setting of revision elbow arthroplasty. Intraoperative histology should be used in conjunction with other studies to definitively establish the diagnosis of infection in the setting of revision elbow arthroplasty.
引用
收藏
页码:1976 / 1979
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
AAOS, 2010, DIAGN PER JOINT INF
[2]   Single-stage revision of peri-prosthetic infection following total elbow replacement [J].
Gille, J. ;
Ince, A. ;
Gonzalez, O. ;
Katzer, A. ;
Loehr, J. F. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2006, 88B (10) :1341-1346
[3]  
GUTOW AP, 1994, HAND CLIN, V10, P521
[4]   Reassessment of the usefulness of frozen section analysis for hip and knee joint revisions [J].
Kanner, William A. ;
Saleh, Khated J. ;
Frierson, Henry F., Jr. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2008, 130 (03) :363-368
[5]  
MIRRA JM, 1976, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P221
[6]   INFECTION AFTER TOTAL ELBOW ARTHROPLASTY [J].
MORREY, BF ;
BRYAN, RS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1983, 65 (03) :330-338
[7]   Definition of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Is There a Consensus? [J].
Parvizi, Javad ;
Jacovides, Christina ;
Zmistowski, Benjamin ;
Jung, Kwang Am .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (11) :3022-3030
[8]   The Fate of Elbows with Unexpected Positive Intraoperative Cultures During Revision Elbow Arthroplasty [J].
Wee, Andy T. ;
Morrey, Bernard F. ;
Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 95A (02) :109-116
[9]   MANAGEMENT OF INFECTION ABOUT TOTAL ELBOW PROSTHESES [J].
WOLFE, SW ;
FIGGIE, MP ;
INGLIS, AE ;
BOHN, WW ;
RANAWAT, CS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1990, 72A (02) :198-212
[10]   Intraoperative frozen section for detecting active infection in failed hip and knee arthroplasties [J].
Wong, YC ;
Lee, QJ ;
Wai, YL ;
Ng, WF .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (08) :1015-1020