Environmental innovation practices and performance: moderating effect of resource commitment

被引:297
作者
Li, Yina [1 ]
机构
[1] S China Univ Technol, Sch Business Adm, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental innovation practices; Institutional pressure; Resource commitment; Performance; SUPPLY CHAIN; INSTITUTIONAL PRESSURES; CLEANER PRODUCTION; REVERSE LOGISTICS; GREEN; MANAGEMENT; IMPACT; TECHNOLOGIES; ENERGY; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.044
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Based on institutional theory and resource based view, this study seeks to examine linkages among institutional pressures, environmental innovation practices and performance. Specially, we test the moderating effect of resource commitment on the consequences of environmental innovation practices. We collected data from 148 manufacturers in Pearl River Delta, China to test the theoretical model. The statistical results reveal that institutional pressures coming from government's command-and-control instrument, overseas customer pressure and competitive pressure exert significant positive impact on environmental innovation practices, while government's economic incentive instrument and domestic customer pressure do not work. We also find environmental innovation practices have significant positive impact on firms' environmental performance, while the effect on financial performance should be through the mediating role of environmental performance. The further analysis reveals that the relationship between environmental innovation practices and financial performance is moderated by the level of resource commitment. As resource commitment increases, the financial performance yielded from environmental innovation practices will be better. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 458
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Aldrich H. E., 1979, ORGANIZATIONS AND EN
[2]   Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Lanoie, Paul .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2008, 23 (04) :45-62
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, GEN THEORY COMPETITI
[4]   Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness [J].
Bansal, P ;
Roth, K .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (04) :717-736
[5]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[6]  
Bernauer T, 2006, WORKING PAPER
[7]   Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries [J].
Brunnermeier, SB ;
Cohen, MA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 45 (02) :278-293
[8]  
Carter C.R., 1998, J BUS LOGIST, V19, P85
[9]  
Daugherty P., 2001, Journal of Business Logistics, V22, P107, DOI [10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00162.x, DOI 10.1002/J.2158-1592.2001.TB00162.X]
[10]   Reverse logistics: superior performance through focused resource commitments to information technology [J].
Daugherty, PJ ;
Richey, RG ;
Genchev, SE ;
Chen, HZ .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2005, 41 (02) :77-92