Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography

被引:90
作者
James, Judy R. [1 ]
Pavlicek, William [1 ]
Hanson, James A. [1 ]
Boltz, Thomas F. [1 ]
Patel, Bhavika K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin Arizona, Diagnost Phys Div, Dept Radiol, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054 USA
[2] Mayo Clin Arizona, Breast Imaging Div, Dept Radiol, Phoenix, AZ USA
关键词
3D tomosynthesis; breast imaging; contrast-enhanced spectral mammography; full field digital mammography; radiation dose; ENHANCED SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; OBSERVER PERFORMANCE; INITIAL-EXPERIENCE; IMAGE VOLUMES; CANCER; WOMEN; MRI; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.16.16743
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. We aimed to compare radiation dose received during contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) using high-and low-energy projections with radiation dose received during 2D full field digital mammography (FFDM) and 3D tomosynthesis on phantoms and patients with varying breast thickness and density. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A single left craniocaudal projection was chosen to determine the doses for 6214 patients who underwent 2D FFDM, 3662 patients who underwent 3D tomosynthesis, and 173 patients who underwent CESM in this retrospective study. Dose measurements were also collected in phantoms with composition mimicking nondense and dense breast tissue. RESULTS. Average glandular dose (AGD) +/- SD was 3.0 +/- 1.1 mGy for CESM exposures at a mean breast thickness of 63 mm. At this thickness, the dose was 2.1 mGy from 2D FFDM and 2.5 mGy from 3D tomosynthesis. The nondense phantom had a mean AGD of 1.0 mGy with 2D FFDM, 1.3 mGy with 3D tomosynthesis, and 1.6 mGy with CESM. The dense breast phantom had a mean AGD of 1.3 mGy with 2D FFDM, 1.4 mGy with 3D tomosynthesis, and 2.1 mGy with CESM. At a compressed thickness of 4.5 cm, radiation exposure from CESM was approximately 25% higher in dense breast phantoms than in nondense breast phantoms. The dose in the dense phantom at a compressed thickness of 6 cm was approximately 42% higher than the dose in the nondense phantom at a compressed thickness of 4.5 cm. CONCLUSION. CESM was found to increase AGD at a mean breast thickness of 63 mm by approximately 0.9 mGy and 0.5 mGy compared with 2D FFDM and 3D tomosynthesis, respectively. Of note, CESM provides a standard image (similar to 2D FFDM) that is obtained using the low-energy projection. Overall, the AGD from CESM falls below the dose limit of 3 mGy set by Mammography Quality Standards Act regulations.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 372
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Digital tomosynthesis: A new future for breast imaging? [J].
Alakhras, M. ;
Bourne, R. ;
Rickard, M. ;
Ng, K. H. ;
Pietrzyk, M. ;
Brennan, P. C. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 68 (05) :E225-E236
[2]  
Alakhras MM, 2016, RAD PROT DOSIMETRY
[3]   Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography in routine clinical practice in 2013 [J].
Badr, S. ;
Laurent, N. ;
Regis, C. ;
Boulanger, L. ;
Lemaille, S. ;
Poncelet, E. .
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2014, 95 (03) :245-258
[4]   Impact on the recall rate of digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography in the screening setting. A double reading experience and review of the literature [J].
Carbonaro, Luca A. ;
Di Leo, Giovanni ;
Clauser, Paola ;
Trimboli, Rubina M. ;
Verardi, Nicola ;
Fedeli, Maria P. ;
Girometti, Rossano ;
Tafa, Alfredo ;
Bruscoli, Paola ;
Saguatti, Gianni ;
Bazzocchi, Massimo ;
Sardanelli, Francesco .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (04) :808-814
[5]   Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis [J].
Chen, Sara C. ;
Carton, Ann-Katherine ;
Albert, Michael ;
Conant, Emily F. ;
Schnall, Mitchell D. ;
Maidment, Andrew D. A. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (02) :229-238
[6]   Diagnostic performance of dual-energy contrast-enhanced subtracted mammography in dense breasts compared to mammography alone: interobserver blind-reading analysis [J].
Cheung, Yun-Chung ;
Lin, Yu-Ching ;
Wan, Yung-Liang ;
Yeow, Kee-Min ;
Huang, Pei-Chin ;
Lo, Yung-Feng ;
Tsai, Hsiu-Pei ;
Ueng, Shir-Hwa ;
Chang, Chee-Jen .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (10) :2394-2403
[7]  
Chou CP, 2016, EUR J RADIOL, V85, P509, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.11.033
[8]   Optimization of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography depending on clinical indication [J].
Dromain, Clarisse ;
Canale, Sandra ;
Saab-Puong, Sylvie ;
Carton, Ann-Katherine ;
Muller, Serge ;
Fallenberg, Eva Maria .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2014, 1 (03)
[9]   Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results [J].
Dromain, Clarisse ;
Thibault, Fabienne ;
Muller, Serge ;
Rimareix, Francoise ;
Delaloge, Suzette ;
Tardivon, Anne ;
Balleyguier, Corinne .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (03) :565-574
[10]   Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: Initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size [J].
Fallenberg, E. M. ;
Dromain, C. ;
Diekmann, F. ;
Engelken, F. ;
Krohn, M. ;
Singh, J. M. ;
Ingold-Heppner, B. ;
Winzer, K. J. ;
Bick, U. ;
Renz, D. M. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (01) :256-264