Does cognitive function predict frequency compressed speech recognition in listeners with normal hearing and normal cognition?

被引:31
作者
Ellis, Rachel J. [1 ]
Munro, Kevin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Psychol Sci, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
Frequency compression; cognition; speech-in-noise; trail making test; reading span test; WORKING-MEMORY; TRANSPOSITION;
D O I
10.3109/14992027.2012.721013
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective:The aim was to investigate the relationship between cognitive ability and frequency compressed speech recognition in listeners with normal hearing and normal cognition. Design:Speech-in-noise recognition was measured using Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers sentences presented over earphones at 65 dB SPL and a range of signal-to-noise ratios. There were three conditions:unprocessed, and at frequency compression ratios of 2:1 and 3:1 (cut-off frequency, 1.6 kHz). Working memory and cognitive ability were measured using the reading span test and the trail making test, respectively. Study sample:Participants were 15 young normally-hearing adults with normal cognition. Results:There was a statistically significant reduction in mean speech recognition from around 80% when unprocessed to 40% for 2:1 compression and 30% for 3:1 compression. There was a statistically significant relationship between speech recognition and cognition for the unprocessed condition but not for the frequency-compressed conditions. Conclusions:The relationship between cognitive functioning and recognition of frequency compressed speech-in-noise was not statistically significant. The findings may have been different if the participants had been provided with training and/or time to 'acclimatize' to the frequency-compressed conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 22
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Comprehension of a Novel Accent by Young and Older Listeners [J].
Adank, Patti ;
Janse, Esther .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2010, 25 (03) :736-740
[2]   Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults [J].
Akeroyd, Michael A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2008, 47 :S53-S71
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1969, IEEE T ACOUST SPEECH, VAU17, P225
[4]   Working memory [J].
Baddeley, Alan .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (04) :R136-R140
[5]  
Bench J, 1979, Br J Audiol, V13, P108, DOI 10.3109/03005367909078884
[6]   Advantages of a non-linear frequency compression algorithm in noise [J].
Bohnert, Andrea ;
Nyffeler, Myriel ;
Keilmann, Annerose .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2010, 267 (07) :1045-1053
[7]  
Boretzki M., 2009, BENEFITS NONLINEAR F
[8]  
Cabin RJ, 2000, Bulletin of the ecological society of America, V81, P246
[9]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond
[10]   INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN WORKING MEMORY AND READING [J].
DANEMAN, M ;
CARPENTER, PA .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1980, 19 (04) :450-466