Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment

被引:42
作者
Hagopian, LP
Rush, KS
Lewin, AB
Long, ES
机构
[1] Kennedy Krieger Inst, Dept Behav Psychol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
preference assessment; reinforcer assessment; stimulus engagement;
D O I
10.1901/jaba.2001.34-475
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Most preference assessments require individuals to choose among two or more stimuli. More recently, the duration of engagement with items has been used as an index of preference. In the current study, the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement (SSE) preference assessment was evaluated with 4 individuals. Stimuli were presented singly for a brief period while engagement with that stimulus was recorded. Although SSE preference rankings closely matched paired stimulus preference assessment rankings for only 2 of the 4 participants, relative preference rankings based on duration of engagement predicted relative reinforcer effectiveness for all participants in a subsequent concurrent-schedule reinforcer assessment. The SSE procedure took less time to administer than the paired stimulus procedure but produced less stable preference rankings across administrations. The SSE procedure may be appropriate for individuals who have difficulty selecting one stimulus from among two or more stimuli, and it may be well suited for evaluating activities that are difficult to present in a paired stimulus format.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 485
页数:11
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Examination of ambiguous stimulus preferences with duration-based measures [J].
DeLeon, IG ;
Iwata, BA ;
Conners, J ;
Wallace, MD .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1999, 32 (01) :111-114
[2]   Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences [J].
DeLeon, IG ;
Iwata, BA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1996, 29 (04) :519-533
[3]   Displacement of leisure reinforcers by food during preference assessments [J].
DeLeon, IG ;
Iwata, BA ;
Roscoe, EM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1997, 30 (03) :475-484
[4]   A COMPARISON OF 2 APPROACHES FOR IDENTIFYING REINFORCERS FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE AND PROFOUND DISABILITIES [J].
FISHER, W ;
PIAZZA, CC ;
BOWMAN, LG ;
HAGOPIAN, LP ;
OWENS, JC ;
SLEVIN, I .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1992, 25 (02) :491-498
[5]  
Fisher WW, 1996, AM J MENT RETARD, V101, P15
[6]   ASSESSMENT OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE AND REINFORCER VALUE WITH PROFOUNDLY RETARDED INDIVIDUALS [J].
PACE, GM ;
IVANCIC, MT ;
EDWARDS, GL ;
IWATA, BA ;
PAGE, TJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1985, 18 (03) :249-255
[7]   Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness [J].
Piazza, CC ;
Fisher, WW ;
Hagopian, LP ;
Bowman, LG ;
Toole, L .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1996, 29 (01) :1-9
[8]   An analogue evaluation of environmental enrichment: The role of stimulus preference [J].
Ringdahl, JE ;
Vollmer, TR ;
Marcus, BA ;
Roane, HS .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1997, 30 (02) :203-216
[9]   Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment [J].
Roane, HS ;
Vollmer, TR ;
Ringdahl, JE ;
Marcus, BA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1998, 31 (04) :605-620