Pharmacodynamic studies on the angiotensin II type 1 antagonists irbesartan and candesartan based on angiotensin II dose response in humans

被引:7
作者
Belz, GG
Butzer, R
Kober, T
Mutschler, T
机构
[1] ZeKaPha GmbH, Ctr Cardiovasc Pharmacol, D-65189 Wiesbaden, Germany
[2] Univ Mainz, Inst Pharm, D-6500 Mainz, Germany
关键词
aldosterone; angiotensin II; angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists candesartan; irbesartan; plasma renin activity; schild regression plot;
D O I
10.1097/00005344-200204000-00012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The in vivo effects of two unsurmountable angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) antagonists, irbesartan (150 mg) and candesartan (8 mg), were studied in a double-blind, randomized, crossover study in 18 healthy men. The drugs' direct vascular effects were assessed as the rightward shift (dose ratio - 1) of angiotensin dose-effect curves on diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Renal and adrenal effects were assessed by plasma renin activity (PRA), aldosterone concentrations, and antagonistic concentration equivalents (n x K-i) in a radioligand rat lung receptor assay. Both drugs exerted similar substantial (> 30-fold) and long-lasting (> 2-fold 47 h after dosing) rightward shifts of the angiotensin II dose effect declining with half-lives of 15 h irbesartan and 12 h candesartan, respectively. Dose ratio - 1 versus n x K-i showed a linear relationship in Schild regression plots; both drugs increased PRA, decreased DBP, and suppressed aldosterone. The slopes of linear relationship between angiotensin antagonism (dose ratio - 1) and PRA increase were almost threefold steeper (p = 0.005) following irbesartan as compared with candesartan. The findings suggest that for the same degree of angiotensin II antagonism, irbesartan produces a greater increase in PRA than candesartan. These pharmacodynamic differences warrant further investigation and clarification.
引用
收藏
页码:561 / 568
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   SOME QUANTITATIVE USES OF DRUG ANTAGONISTS [J].
ARUNLAKSHANA, O ;
SCHILD, HO .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1959, 14 (01) :48-58
[2]  
Belz G G, 2000, J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst, V1, P336, DOI 10.3317/jraas.2000.063
[3]   Time course and extent of angiotensin II antagonism after irbesartan, losartan, and valsartan in humans assessed by angiotensin II dose response and radioligand receptor assay [J].
Belz, GG ;
Butzer, R ;
Kober, S ;
Mang, C ;
Mutschler, E .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1999, 66 (04) :367-373
[4]   HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSES TO ANGIOTENSIN-I IN NORMAL VOLUNTEERS AND THE ANTAGONISM BY THE ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING ENZYME-INHIBITOR CILAZAPRIL [J].
BELZ, GG ;
ESSIG, J ;
WELLSTEIN, A .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1987, 9 (02) :219-224
[5]  
BreithauptGrogler K, 1997, INT J CLIN PHARM TH, V35, P434
[6]   Angiotensin II receptor antagonists [J].
Burnier, M ;
Brunner, HR .
LANCET, 2000, 355 (9204) :637-645
[7]   AT2 receptor stimulation increases aortic cyclic GMP in SHRSP by a kinin-dependent mechanism [J].
Gohlke, P ;
Pees, C ;
Unger, T .
HYPERTENSION, 1998, 31 (01) :349-355
[8]   Effect of angiotensin II infusion with and without angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade on nitric oxide metabolism and endothelin in human beings: A placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers [J].
Gossmann, J ;
Bunkhardt, R ;
Harder, S ;
Lenz, T ;
Sedlmeyer, A ;
Klinkhardt, U ;
Haak, T ;
Geiger, H ;
Scheuermann, EH .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2000, 68 (05) :501-509
[9]   KINETICS OF PHARMACOLOGIC RESPONSE [J].
HOLFORD, NHG ;
SHEINER, LB .
PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1982, 16 (02) :143-166
[10]   Vasodepressor actions of angiotensin-(1-7) unmasked during combined treatment with lisinopril and losartan [J].
Iyer, SN ;
Chappell, MC ;
Averill, DB ;
Diz, DI ;
Ferrario, CM .
HYPERTENSION, 1998, 31 (02) :699-705