Creative Problem Solving in GSS Groups: Do Creative Styles Matter?

被引:10
作者
Ray, Deepa K. [1 ]
Romano, Nicholas C., Jr. [2 ]
机构
[1] SP Jain Inst Management & Res, Bombay 400058, Maharashtra, India
[2] Fac Commerce & Adm, Sch Informat Management, Wellington 6140, New Zealand
关键词
Creative style; Electronic brainstorming; Creative problem solving; GSS; FACE-TO-FACE; IDEA-GENERATION; BRAINSTORMING GROUPS; PRODUCTIVITY LOSS; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; TEAMS; PERFORMANCE; SELECTION; BLOCKING; THINKING;
D O I
10.1007/s10726-012-9309-3
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Creative groups drive innovation and organizational change and collaborative systems can be used to pool creative team members across the globe. How individual creative preference impacts the group's creative performance across different creative problem solving phases in a GSS environment is not well understood. The objective of this exploratory study was to understand if there are differences in group performance when groups with varying member creative styles interact solely via GSS. We conducted a quasi-experimental study that compared the performance of groups with two alternate member styles interacting only via group support systems during a creative problem solving process. Ideator and Evaluator groups were compared on their divergent and convergent phase performance. Significant differences were found between the Ideator groups and Evaluator groups on idea fluency, idea flexibility, idea novelty, idea elaboration and solution cost-effectiveness. No significant differences were found between the performance of the two groups on solution feasibility and novelty. Results indicate that member creative styles play an important role in determining the performance of technology-supported groups. These results aid researchers and practitioners by improving their understanding of the performance of creative teams interacting solely via collaborative support systems for creative problem solving tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:1129 / 1157
页数:29
相关论文
共 78 条
[71]  
Steiner I. D., 1972, Group process and productivity
[72]   Group composition, creative synergy, and group performance [J].
Taggar, S .
JOURNAL OF CREATIVE BEHAVIOR, 2001, 35 (04) :261-286
[73]   The effects of individual cognitive ability and idea stimulation on idea-generation performance [J].
Valacich, Joseph S. ;
Jung, J. H. ;
Looney, Clayton A. .
GROUP DYNAMICS-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2006, 10 (01) :1-15
[74]  
Vicenzi R, 2000, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2000 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1 AND 2, P276, DOI 10.1109/ICMIT.2000.917350
[75]  
Wallas G., 1926, The art of thought
[76]   Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups [J].
West, MA .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE, 2002, 51 (03) :355-387
[77]  
Witkin H A, 1981, Psychol Issues, P1
[78]   TOWARD A THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONAL CREATIVITY [J].
WOODMAN, RW ;
SAWYER, JE ;
GRIFFIN, RW .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1993, 18 (02) :293-321