Creative Problem Solving in GSS Groups: Do Creative Styles Matter?

被引:10
作者
Ray, Deepa K. [1 ]
Romano, Nicholas C., Jr. [2 ]
机构
[1] SP Jain Inst Management & Res, Bombay 400058, Maharashtra, India
[2] Fac Commerce & Adm, Sch Informat Management, Wellington 6140, New Zealand
关键词
Creative style; Electronic brainstorming; Creative problem solving; GSS; FACE-TO-FACE; IDEA-GENERATION; BRAINSTORMING GROUPS; PRODUCTIVITY LOSS; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; TEAMS; PERFORMANCE; SELECTION; BLOCKING; THINKING;
D O I
10.1007/s10726-012-9309-3
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Creative groups drive innovation and organizational change and collaborative systems can be used to pool creative team members across the globe. How individual creative preference impacts the group's creative performance across different creative problem solving phases in a GSS environment is not well understood. The objective of this exploratory study was to understand if there are differences in group performance when groups with varying member creative styles interact solely via GSS. We conducted a quasi-experimental study that compared the performance of groups with two alternate member styles interacting only via group support systems during a creative problem solving process. Ideator and Evaluator groups were compared on their divergent and convergent phase performance. Significant differences were found between the Ideator groups and Evaluator groups on idea fluency, idea flexibility, idea novelty, idea elaboration and solution cost-effectiveness. No significant differences were found between the performance of the two groups on solution feasibility and novelty. Results indicate that member creative styles play an important role in determining the performance of technology-supported groups. These results aid researchers and practitioners by improving their understanding of the performance of creative teams interacting solely via collaborative support systems for creative problem solving tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:1129 / 1157
页数:29
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Amabile T.M., 1996, Creativity in context: The social psychology of creativity
[3]   Small group brainstorming and idea quality - Is electronic brainstorming the most effective approach? [J].
Barki, H ;
Pinsonneault, A .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2001, 32 (02) :158-205
[4]   TRAINING IN CREATIVE PROBLEM-SOLVING - EFFECTS ON IDEATION AND PROBLEM FINDING AND SOLVING IN AN INDUSTRIAL-RESEARCH ORGANIZATION [J].
BASADUR, M ;
GRAEN, GB ;
GREEN, SG .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1982, 30 (01) :41-70
[5]   IDENTIFYING INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN CREATIVE PROBLEM-SOLVING STYLE, (REPRINT) [J].
BASADUR, M ;
GRAEN, G ;
WAKABAYASHI, M .
JOURNAL OF CREATIVE BEHAVIOR, 1990, 24 (02) :111-131
[6]   Team performance and satisfaction: A link to cognitive style within a process framework [J].
Basadur, M ;
Head, M .
JOURNAL OF CREATIVE BEHAVIOR, 2001, 35 (04) :227-248
[7]   Understanding how creative thinking skills, attitudes and behaviors work together: A causal process model [J].
Basadur, M ;
Runco, MA ;
Vega, LA .
JOURNAL OF CREATIVE BEHAVIOR, 2000, 34 (02) :77-100
[8]  
Basadur Min, 2005, The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, V15, P13
[9]   Expertise and collaboration in the geographically dispersed organization [J].
Boh, Wai Fong ;
Ren, Yuqing ;
Kiesler, Sara ;
Bussjaeger, Robert .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (04) :595-612
[10]  
Briggs R.O., 1997, CREATIVITY INNOVATIO, V6, P106