Cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity: comparison of posterior-only versus anteroposterior approach

被引:12
作者
Ogura, Yoji [1 ]
Gum, Jeffrey L. [1 ]
Hostin, Richard A. [2 ]
Robinson, Chessie [3 ]
Ames, Christopher P. [4 ]
Glassman, Steven D. [1 ]
Burton, Douglas C. [5 ]
Bess, R. Shay [6 ]
Shaffrey, Christopher, I [7 ]
Smith, Justin S. [8 ]
Yeramaneni, Samrat [3 ]
Lafage, Virginie F. [9 ]
Protopsaltis, Themistocles [10 ]
Passias, Peter G. [10 ]
Schwab, Frank J. [9 ]
Carreon, Leah Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Norton Leatherman Spine Ctr, 210 East Gray St,Suite 900, Louisville, KY 40204 USA
[2] Baylor Scoliosis Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Dallas, TX 75093 USA
[3] Baylor Scott & White Hlth, Ctr Clin Effectiveness, 8080 N Cent Expressway, Dallas, TX 75206 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurol Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[5] Univ Kansas, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Med Ctr, Kansas City, KS 66160 USA
[6] Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Denver Int Spine Clin, Denver, CO 80218 USA
[7] Duke Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Sch Med, 40 Duke Med Circle Clin 1B-1C, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[8] Univ Virginia Hlth Syst, Dept Neurosurg, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[9] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthopaed Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA
[10] NYU, Dept Orthopaed, Hosp Joint Dis, New York, NY USA
关键词
Adult spinal deformity; Cost-effectiveness; Posterior-only approach; Combined anteroposterior approach; QALY; Complications; COMBINED ANTERIOR; RISK-FACTORS; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; NONOPERATIVE-CARE; UNITED-STATES; SURGERY; OUTCOMES; RELEASE; COMPLICATIONS; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2020.03.018
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Considerable debate exists regarding the optimal surgical approach for adult spinal deformity (ASD). It remains unclear which approach, posterior-only or combined anterior-posterior (AP), is more cost-effective. Our goal is to determine the 2-year cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for each approach. PURPOSE: To compare the 2-year cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment for ASD between the posterior-only approach and combined AP approach. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective economic analysis of a prospective, multicenter database PATIENT SAMPLE: From a prospective, multicenter surgical database of ASD, patients undergoing five or more level fusions through a posterior-only or AP approach were identified and compared. METHODS: QALYs gained were determined using baseline, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative Short Form 6D. Cost was calculated from actual, direct hospital costs including any subsequent readmission or revision. Cost-effectiveness was determined using cost/QALY gained. RESULTS: The AP approach showed significantly higher index cost than the posterior-only approach ($84,329 vs. $64,281). This margin decreased at 2-year follow-up with total costs of $89,824 and $73,904, respectively. QALYs gained at 2 years were similar with 0.21 and 0.17 in the posterior-only and the AP approaches, respectively. The cost/QALY at 2 years after surgery was significantly higher in the AP approach ($525,080) than in the posterior-only approach ($351,086). CONCLUSIONS: We assessed 2-year cost-effectiveness for the surgical treatment through posterior-only and AP approaches. The posterior-only approach is less expensive both for the index surgery and at 2-year follow-up. The QALY gained at 2-years was similar between the two approaches. Thus, posterior-only approach was more cost-effective than the AP approach under our study parameters. However, both approaches were not cost-effective at 2-year follow-up. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1464 / 1470
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Cost-effectiveness of Corrective Fusion Surgeries for Adult Spinal Deformities A Comparison by Operative Method [J].
Arima, Hideyuki ;
Hasegawa, Tomohiko ;
Yamato, Yu ;
Kato, Masashi ;
Yoshida, Go ;
Banno, Tomohiro ;
Oe, Shin ;
Mihara, Yuki ;
Ushirozako, Hiroki ;
Yamada, Tomohiro ;
Watanabe, Yuh ;
Ide, Koichiro ;
Nakai, Keiichi ;
Kurosu, Kenta ;
Matsuyama, Yukihiro .
SPINE, 2021, 46 (18) :1249-1257
[22]   Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Surgical versus Medical Treatment of Prolactinomas [J].
Zygourakis, Corinna C. ;
Imber, Brandon S. ;
Chen, Rebecca ;
Han, Seunggu J. ;
Blevins, Lewis ;
Molinaro, Annette ;
Kahn, James G. ;
Aghi, Manish K. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART B-SKULL BASE, 2017, 78 (02) :125-131
[23]   One-stage surgical treatment for upper thoracic spinal tuberculosis by internal fixation, debridement, and combined interbody and posterior fusion via posterior-only approach [J].
Zhang, Hongqi ;
Sheng, Bin ;
Tang, Mingxing ;
Guo, Chaofeng ;
Liu, Shaohua ;
Huang, Shu ;
Gao, Qile ;
Liu, Jinyang ;
Wu, Jianhuang .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (03) :616-623
[24]   Surgical treatment of giant benign sacral neurogenic tumors using the posterior-only approach [J].
Zang, Jie ;
Guo, Wei ;
Yang, Yi ;
Wei, Ran .
CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 185
[25]   Cost-Effectiveness of Surgical Versus Conservative Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures [J].
Aras, Efe Levent ;
Bunger, Cody ;
Hansen, Ebbe Stender ;
Sogaard, Rikke .
SPINE, 2016, 41 (04) :337-343
[26]   Cost-Effectiveness of a Radio Frequency Hemostatic Sealer (RFHS) in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery [J].
Gandhoke, Gurpreet S. ;
Smith, Kenneth J. ;
Pandya, Yash K. ;
Alan, Nima ;
Kanter, Adam S. ;
Okonkwo, David O. .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 122 :171-175
[27]   Cost-effectiveness of Surgical Treatment for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Spinal Stenosis [J].
Harrop, James S. ;
Hilibrand, Alan ;
Mihalovich, Kathryn E. ;
Dettori, Joseph R. ;
Chapman, Jens .
SPINE, 2014, 39 (22S) :S75-S85
[28]   Two-stage treatment for severe spinal kyphotic deformity secondary to tuberculosis: halo-pelvic traction followed by a posterior-only approach correction [J].
Qi, Longtao ;
Zhao, Yao ;
Xu, Beiyu ;
Li, Chunde ;
Wang, Yu .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
[29]   Comparison of Thoracoscopic Anterior Release Combined With Posterior Spinal Fusion Versus Posterior-only Approach With an All-pedicle Screw Construct in the Treatment of Rigid Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis [J].
Shi, Zhicai ;
Chen, Jiayu ;
Wang, Chao ;
Li, Ming ;
Li, Quan ;
Zhang, Ye ;
Li, Cheng ;
Qiao, Yuehua ;
Guo Kaijin ;
Chen Xiangyang ;
Ran, Bo .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (08) :E454-E459
[30]   Posterior-only approach with titanium mesh cages versus autogenous iliac bone graft for thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis [J].
Wu, Wence ;
Wang, Shenglin ;
Li, Zhechen ;
Lin, Renqin ;
Lin, Jianhua .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2021, 44 (04) :598-605