Cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity: comparison of posterior-only versus anteroposterior approach

被引:12
作者
Ogura, Yoji [1 ]
Gum, Jeffrey L. [1 ]
Hostin, Richard A. [2 ]
Robinson, Chessie [3 ]
Ames, Christopher P. [4 ]
Glassman, Steven D. [1 ]
Burton, Douglas C. [5 ]
Bess, R. Shay [6 ]
Shaffrey, Christopher, I [7 ]
Smith, Justin S. [8 ]
Yeramaneni, Samrat [3 ]
Lafage, Virginie F. [9 ]
Protopsaltis, Themistocles [10 ]
Passias, Peter G. [10 ]
Schwab, Frank J. [9 ]
Carreon, Leah Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Norton Leatherman Spine Ctr, 210 East Gray St,Suite 900, Louisville, KY 40204 USA
[2] Baylor Scoliosis Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Dallas, TX 75093 USA
[3] Baylor Scott & White Hlth, Ctr Clin Effectiveness, 8080 N Cent Expressway, Dallas, TX 75206 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurol Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[5] Univ Kansas, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Med Ctr, Kansas City, KS 66160 USA
[6] Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Denver Int Spine Clin, Denver, CO 80218 USA
[7] Duke Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Sch Med, 40 Duke Med Circle Clin 1B-1C, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[8] Univ Virginia Hlth Syst, Dept Neurosurg, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[9] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthopaed Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA
[10] NYU, Dept Orthopaed, Hosp Joint Dis, New York, NY USA
关键词
Adult spinal deformity; Cost-effectiveness; Posterior-only approach; Combined anteroposterior approach; QALY; Complications; COMBINED ANTERIOR; RISK-FACTORS; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; NONOPERATIVE-CARE; UNITED-STATES; SURGERY; OUTCOMES; RELEASE; COMPLICATIONS; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2020.03.018
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Considerable debate exists regarding the optimal surgical approach for adult spinal deformity (ASD). It remains unclear which approach, posterior-only or combined anterior-posterior (AP), is more cost-effective. Our goal is to determine the 2-year cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for each approach. PURPOSE: To compare the 2-year cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment for ASD between the posterior-only approach and combined AP approach. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective economic analysis of a prospective, multicenter database PATIENT SAMPLE: From a prospective, multicenter surgical database of ASD, patients undergoing five or more level fusions through a posterior-only or AP approach were identified and compared. METHODS: QALYs gained were determined using baseline, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative Short Form 6D. Cost was calculated from actual, direct hospital costs including any subsequent readmission or revision. Cost-effectiveness was determined using cost/QALY gained. RESULTS: The AP approach showed significantly higher index cost than the posterior-only approach ($84,329 vs. $64,281). This margin decreased at 2-year follow-up with total costs of $89,824 and $73,904, respectively. QALYs gained at 2 years were similar with 0.21 and 0.17 in the posterior-only and the AP approaches, respectively. The cost/QALY at 2 years after surgery was significantly higher in the AP approach ($525,080) than in the posterior-only approach ($351,086). CONCLUSIONS: We assessed 2-year cost-effectiveness for the surgical treatment through posterior-only and AP approaches. The posterior-only approach is less expensive both for the index surgery and at 2-year follow-up. The QALY gained at 2-years was similar between the two approaches. Thus, posterior-only approach was more cost-effective than the AP approach under our study parameters. However, both approaches were not cost-effective at 2-year follow-up. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1464 / 1470
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   Cost-effectiveness of adult spinal deformity surgery in a military healthcare system [J].
Neal, Chris J. ;
Mandell, Kara ;
Tasikas, Ellen ;
Delaney, John J. ;
Miller, Charles A. ;
Schlaff, Cody D. ;
Rosner, Michael K. .
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2018, 45 (06)
[12]   Factors predicting cost-effectiveness of adult spinal deformity surgery at 2 years [J].
Fischer C.R. ;
Terran J. ;
Lonner B. ;
McHugh B. ;
Warren D. ;
Glassman S. ;
Bridwell K. ;
Schwab F. ;
Lafage V. .
Spine Deformity, 2014, 2 (5) :415-422
[13]   Factors Associated With the Maintenance of Cost-effectiveness at Five Years in Adult Spinal Deformity Corrective Surgery [J].
Passias, Peter G. ;
Mir, Jamshaid M. ;
Dave, Pooja ;
Smith, Justin S. ;
Lafage, Renaud ;
Gum, Jeffrey ;
Line, Breton G. ;
Diebo, Bassel ;
Daniels, Alan H. ;
Hamilton, David Kojo ;
Buell, Thomas J. ;
Scheer, Justin K. ;
Eastlack, Robert K. ;
Mullin, Jeffrey P. ;
Mundis, Gregory M. ;
Hosogane, Naobumi ;
Yagi, Mitsuru ;
Schoenfeld, Andrew J. ;
Uribe, Juan S. ;
Anand, Neel ;
Mummaneni, Praveen V. ;
Chou, Dean ;
Klineberg, Eric O. ;
Kebaish, Khaled M. ;
Lewis, Stephen J. ;
Gupta, Munish C. ;
Kim, Han Jo ;
Hart, Robert A. ;
Lenke, Lawrence G. ;
Ames, Christopher P. ;
Shaffrey, Christopher I. ;
Schwab, Frank J. ;
Lafage, Virginie ;
Hostin Jr, Richard A. ;
Bess, Shay ;
Burton, Douglas C. .
SPINE, 2024, 49 (20) :1401-1409
[14]   A cost-effectiveness comparisons of adult spinal deformity surgery in the United States and Japan [J].
Mitsuru Yagi ;
Christopher P. Ames ;
Malla Keefe ;
Naobumi Hosogane ;
Justin S. Smith ;
Christopher I. Shaffrey ;
Frank Schwab ;
Virginie Lafage ;
R. Shay Bess ;
Morio Matsumoto ;
Kota Watanabe .
European Spine Journal, 2018, 27 :678-684
[15]   Incremental cost-effectiveness of adult spinal deformity surgery [J].
Shaffrey, Christopher I. ;
Smith, Justin S. .
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2014, 36 (05)
[16]   Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Cost-effectiveness in Surgically Treated Adult Spinal Deformity Over 70 Years A Propensity score-Matched Analysis [J].
Yagi, Mitsuru ;
Fujita, Nobuyuki ;
Okada, Eijiro ;
Tsuji, Osahiko ;
Nagoshi, Narihito ;
Asazuma, Takashi ;
Nakamura, Masaya ;
Matsumoto, Morio ;
Watanabe, Kota .
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (01) :E14-E20
[17]   Revision Surgery for a Rod Fracture with Multirod Constructs Using a Posterior-Only Approach Following Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity [J].
Yamato, Yu ;
Hasegawa, Tomohiko ;
Yoshida, Go ;
Banno, Tomohiro ;
Oe, Shin ;
Arima, Hideyuki ;
Mihara, Yuki ;
Ushirozako, Hiroki ;
Yamada, Tomohiro ;
Watanabe, Yuh ;
Ide, Koichiro ;
Nakai, Keiichi ;
Kurosu, Kenta ;
Matsuyama, Yukihiro .
ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, :740-748
[18]   Comparison of combined anterior-posterior approach versus posterior-only approach in neuromuscular scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Shao, Zhen-Xuan ;
Fang, Xia ;
Lv, Qing-Bo ;
Hu, Zhi-Chao ;
Shao, Shi-Yun ;
Hu, Yuan-Bo ;
Wu, Ai-Min ;
Wang, Xiang-Yang .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 27 (09) :2213-2222
[19]   Comparison of combined anterior-posterior approach versus posterior-only approach in treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a meta-analysis [J].
Chen, Zihao ;
Rong, Limin .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (02) :363-371
[20]   Comparison of Modified Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion and Posterior-Only Approach in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis [J].
Zhang, Xiang ;
Wang, Yongqiang ;
Lu, Yilin ;
Li, Junyu ;
Sun, Zhuoran ;
Zeng, Yan ;
Li, Weishi ;
Yu, Miao .
ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2025, 17 (06) :1680-1690