Less is more: cruroplasty alone is sufficient for revisional hiatal hernia surgery

被引:7
作者
Nguyen, Robert [1 ]
Dunn, Colin P. [1 ,2 ]
Putnam, Luke [1 ,2 ]
Won, Paul [1 ]
Patel, Tanu [1 ]
Brito, Stephanie [1 ]
Bildzukewicz, Nikolai A. [1 ,2 ]
Lipham, John C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Div Upper GI & Gen Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[2] Hoag Mem Hosp, Digest Hlth Inst, Newport Beach, CA 92663 USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Med Ctr Usc, 1510 San Pablo St 514, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2021年 / 35卷 / 08期
关键词
Hiatal hernia; Revision; Cruroplasty; Fundoplication; LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PARAESOPHAGEAL HERNIA; GASTROESOPHAGEAL-REFLUX; FUNDOPLICATION FAILURE; REPAIR; RISK; RECURRENCE; SYMPTOMS; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-020-07897-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Recurrence of hiatal hernia after anti-reflux surgery is common, with past studies reporting recurrence rates of 10-15%. Most patients experience relief from GERD symptoms following initial repair; however, those suffering from recurrence can have symptoms severe enough to warrant another operation. Although the standard of care is to revise the fundoplication or convert to magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in addition to redo cruroplasty, it stands to reason that with an intact fundoplication, a repeat cruroplasty is all that is necessary to alleviate the patients' symptoms. In other words, only fix that which is broken. Methods A retrospective review of patients with symptomatic hiatal hernia recurrence who underwent reoperation between January 2011 and September 2018 was conducted. Patients who received revisional cruroplasty alone were compared with cruroplasty plus some other revision (fundoplication revision, or takedown and MSA placement). Demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Results There were 73 patients identified. Median time to recurrence after the first procedure was 3.7 (1.9-8.2) years. Thirty-two percent of the patients had GERD symptoms for more than 10 years. Twenty-six patients underwent cruroplasty only. Forty-seven patients underwent cruroplasty plus fundoplication revision. There were no significant differences in operative times (2.4 h cruroplasty alone, 2.8 h full revision,p = 0.75) or postoperative complications between the two groups. Patients had a mean follow-up time of 1.64 years. Of the 73 patients, 8 had subsequent hiatal hernia recurrence. The recurrence rate for patients with cruroplasty alone was 11%, and the recurrence rate for the full revision group was 12% (p = 1.00). Conclusion Leaving an intact fundoplication alone at the time of revisional surgery did not adversely affect surgical outcomes. This data suggests a role for hernia-only repair for recurrent hiatal hernias.
引用
收藏
页码:4661 / 4666
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Hiatal Hernia Repair Outcomes
    Sutherland, Victoria
    Kuwada, Timothy
    Gersin, Keith
    Simms, Connie
    Stefanidis, Dimitrios
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2016, 82 (08) : 743 - 747
  • [42] The initial outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for the hiatal hernia repair: a tertiary center study
    Nguyen Quang Huy
    Dang Khai Toan
    Tran Thanh Hien
    Ho Dang Dang Khoa
    Mai Duc Hung
    BALI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 13 (01) : 231 - 234
  • [43] Observational medical treatment or surgery for giant paraesophageal hiatal hernia in elderly patients
    Braghetto, Italo
    Carlos Molina, Juan
    Korn, Owen
    Lanzarini, Enrique
    Musleh, Maher
    Figueroa, Manuel
    Rojas, Jorge
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2022, 35 (12)
  • [44] Gastropericardial fistula as an early complication after surgery for combined paraesophageal and hiatal hernia
    Kalder, J
    Köster, H
    Hellinger, A
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2006, 54 (01) : 67 - 69
  • [45] Mesh Implantation in Anti-Reflux and Hiatal Hernia Surgery Contra Statement
    Kuvendjiska, Jasmina
    Hoeppner, Jens
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2021, 146 (02): : 200 - 203
  • [46] Laparoscopic large hiatus hernia repair with mesh reinforcement versus suture cruroplasty alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    K. Rajkomar
    C. S. Wong
    L. Gall
    C. MacKay
    A. Macdonald
    M. Forshaw
    C. Craig
    Hernia, 2023, 27 : 849 - 860
  • [47] Propensity score matched analysis of laparoscopic revisional and conversional sleeve gastrectomy with concurrent hiatal hernia repair
    Perez, Samuel C.
    Ericksen, Forrest
    Richardson, Norbert
    Thaqi, Milot
    Wheeler, Andrew A.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (07): : 3866 - 3874
  • [48] Current surgical concepts for type III hiatal hernia: a survey among members of the Swiss Society of Visceral Surgery
    Gerdes, Stephan
    Vetter, Diana
    Muller, Philip C.
    Kapp, Joshua R.
    Gutschow, Christian A.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2021, 151
  • [49] Hiatal Hernia is More Frequent than Expected in Bariatric Patients. Intraoperative Findings during Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
    Hutopila, Ionut
    Copaescu, Catalin
    CHIRURGIA, 2019, 114 (06) : 779 - 789
  • [50] Surgeon variability in repair of hiatal hernia at the time of bariatric surgery
    Valukas, Catherine S.
    Vitello, Dominic
    Sanchez, Joseph
    Soetikno, Alan
    Prinz, Joanne
    Hungness, Eric S.
    Teitelbaum, Ezra N.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (09): : 5017 - 5022