Less is more: cruroplasty alone is sufficient for revisional hiatal hernia surgery

被引:7
作者
Nguyen, Robert [1 ]
Dunn, Colin P. [1 ,2 ]
Putnam, Luke [1 ,2 ]
Won, Paul [1 ]
Patel, Tanu [1 ]
Brito, Stephanie [1 ]
Bildzukewicz, Nikolai A. [1 ,2 ]
Lipham, John C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Div Upper GI & Gen Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[2] Hoag Mem Hosp, Digest Hlth Inst, Newport Beach, CA 92663 USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Med Ctr Usc, 1510 San Pablo St 514, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2021年 / 35卷 / 08期
关键词
Hiatal hernia; Revision; Cruroplasty; Fundoplication; LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PARAESOPHAGEAL HERNIA; GASTROESOPHAGEAL-REFLUX; FUNDOPLICATION FAILURE; REPAIR; RISK; RECURRENCE; SYMPTOMS; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-020-07897-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Recurrence of hiatal hernia after anti-reflux surgery is common, with past studies reporting recurrence rates of 10-15%. Most patients experience relief from GERD symptoms following initial repair; however, those suffering from recurrence can have symptoms severe enough to warrant another operation. Although the standard of care is to revise the fundoplication or convert to magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in addition to redo cruroplasty, it stands to reason that with an intact fundoplication, a repeat cruroplasty is all that is necessary to alleviate the patients' symptoms. In other words, only fix that which is broken. Methods A retrospective review of patients with symptomatic hiatal hernia recurrence who underwent reoperation between January 2011 and September 2018 was conducted. Patients who received revisional cruroplasty alone were compared with cruroplasty plus some other revision (fundoplication revision, or takedown and MSA placement). Demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Results There were 73 patients identified. Median time to recurrence after the first procedure was 3.7 (1.9-8.2) years. Thirty-two percent of the patients had GERD symptoms for more than 10 years. Twenty-six patients underwent cruroplasty only. Forty-seven patients underwent cruroplasty plus fundoplication revision. There were no significant differences in operative times (2.4 h cruroplasty alone, 2.8 h full revision,p = 0.75) or postoperative complications between the two groups. Patients had a mean follow-up time of 1.64 years. Of the 73 patients, 8 had subsequent hiatal hernia recurrence. The recurrence rate for patients with cruroplasty alone was 11%, and the recurrence rate for the full revision group was 12% (p = 1.00). Conclusion Leaving an intact fundoplication alone at the time of revisional surgery did not adversely affect surgical outcomes. This data suggests a role for hernia-only repair for recurrent hiatal hernias.
引用
收藏
页码:4661 / 4666
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hiatal hernia recurrence following magnetic sphincter augmentation and posterior cruroplasty: intermediate-term outcomes
    Kais A. Rona
    James M. Tatum
    Joerg Zehetner
    Katrin Schwameis
    Carol Chow
    Kamran Samakar
    Adrian Dobrowolsky
    Caitlin C. Houghton
    Nikolai Bildzukewicz
    John C. Lipham
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32 : 3374 - 3379
  • [32] Dyspeptic Symptoms after Laparoscopic Large Hiatal Hernia Repair and Primary Antireflux Surgery for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Comparative Study
    Furnee, Edgar J. B.
    Draaisma, Werner A.
    Hazebroek, Eric J.
    van Lelyveld, Niels
    Smout, Andre J. P. M.
    Broeders, Ivo A. M. J.
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 27 (06) : 487 - 491
  • [33] Outcomes After Esophagectomy in Patients With Prior Antireflux or Hiatal Hernia Surgery
    Chang, Andrew C.
    Lee, Julia S.
    Sawicki, Konrad T.
    Pickens, Allan
    Orringer, Mark B.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2010, 89 (04) : 1015 - 1023
  • [34] Minimally invasive surgery: hiatal hernia repair-a narrative review
    Hua, Lina
    Kohn, Geoffrey P.
    ANNALS OF ESOPHAGUS, 2022, 5
  • [35] Long-term Outcome of Cruroplasty Reinforcement with Human Acellular Dermal Matrix in Large Paraesophageal Hiatal Hernia
    Yong Kwon Lee
    Elaine James
    Victor Bochkarev
    Michelle Vitamvas
    Dmitry Oleynikov
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2008, 12 : 811 - 815
  • [36] Hiatal Hernia Evaluation Before Bariatric Surgery: Should It Be Routinely Done?
    Imam, Ashraf
    Asfour, George
    Imam, Riham
    Bilitzky-Kopit, Avital
    Pines, Guy
    Sapojnikov, Shimon
    Khalayleh, Harbi
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2021, 31 (03) : 1013 - 1020
  • [37] Long-term outcome of cruroplasty reinforcement with human acellular dermal matrix in large paraesophageal hiatal hernia
    Lee, Yong Kwon
    James, Elaine
    Bochkarev, Victor
    Vitamvas, Michelle
    Oleynikov, Dmitry
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2008, 12 (05) : 811 - 815
  • [38] Laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with sliding hiatal hernia
    R Scilletta
    A Pesce
    MA Trovato
    A Branca
    TR Portale
    B Scilletta
    S Puleo
    BMC Geriatrics, 11 (Suppl 1)
  • [39] Temporal patterns of hiatus hernia recurrence and hiatal failure: quality of life and recurrence after revision surgery
    Suppiah, A.
    Sirimanna, P.
    Vivian, S. J.
    O'Donnell, H.
    Lee, G.
    Falk, G. L.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2017, 30 (04): : 1 - 8
  • [40] Oesophagogastric necrosis after surgery for a giant hiatal hernia
    de Angulo Martin, David Ruiz
    Sancho Moya, Cristina
    Munitiz Ruiz, Vicente
    Romera Barba, Elena
    Parrilla, Pascual
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2010, 87 (06): : 393 - 395