Less is more: cruroplasty alone is sufficient for revisional hiatal hernia surgery

被引:7
|
作者
Nguyen, Robert [1 ]
Dunn, Colin P. [1 ,2 ]
Putnam, Luke [1 ,2 ]
Won, Paul [1 ]
Patel, Tanu [1 ]
Brito, Stephanie [1 ]
Bildzukewicz, Nikolai A. [1 ,2 ]
Lipham, John C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Div Upper GI & Gen Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[2] Hoag Mem Hosp, Digest Hlth Inst, Newport Beach, CA 92663 USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Med Ctr Usc, 1510 San Pablo St 514, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2021年 / 35卷 / 08期
关键词
Hiatal hernia; Revision; Cruroplasty; Fundoplication; LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PARAESOPHAGEAL HERNIA; GASTROESOPHAGEAL-REFLUX; FUNDOPLICATION FAILURE; REPAIR; RISK; RECURRENCE; SYMPTOMS; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-020-07897-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Recurrence of hiatal hernia after anti-reflux surgery is common, with past studies reporting recurrence rates of 10-15%. Most patients experience relief from GERD symptoms following initial repair; however, those suffering from recurrence can have symptoms severe enough to warrant another operation. Although the standard of care is to revise the fundoplication or convert to magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in addition to redo cruroplasty, it stands to reason that with an intact fundoplication, a repeat cruroplasty is all that is necessary to alleviate the patients' symptoms. In other words, only fix that which is broken. Methods A retrospective review of patients with symptomatic hiatal hernia recurrence who underwent reoperation between January 2011 and September 2018 was conducted. Patients who received revisional cruroplasty alone were compared with cruroplasty plus some other revision (fundoplication revision, or takedown and MSA placement). Demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Results There were 73 patients identified. Median time to recurrence after the first procedure was 3.7 (1.9-8.2) years. Thirty-two percent of the patients had GERD symptoms for more than 10 years. Twenty-six patients underwent cruroplasty only. Forty-seven patients underwent cruroplasty plus fundoplication revision. There were no significant differences in operative times (2.4 h cruroplasty alone, 2.8 h full revision,p = 0.75) or postoperative complications between the two groups. Patients had a mean follow-up time of 1.64 years. Of the 73 patients, 8 had subsequent hiatal hernia recurrence. The recurrence rate for patients with cruroplasty alone was 11%, and the recurrence rate for the full revision group was 12% (p = 1.00). Conclusion Leaving an intact fundoplication alone at the time of revisional surgery did not adversely affect surgical outcomes. This data suggests a role for hernia-only repair for recurrent hiatal hernias.
引用
收藏
页码:4661 / 4666
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Less is more: cruroplasty alone is sufficient for revisional hiatal hernia surgery
    Robert Nguyen
    Colin P. Dunn
    Luke Putnam
    Paul Won
    Tanu Patel
    Stephanie Brito
    Nikolai A. Bildzukewicz
    John C. Lipham
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 4661 - 4666
  • [2] Long-term durability and temporal pattern of revisional surgery of laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair
    Ugliono, Elettra
    Rebecchi, Fabrizio
    Franco, Caterina
    Morino, Mario
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2025, : 419 - 425
  • [3] Cruroplasty as a standalone treatment for recurrent hiatal hernia repair
    Tran, Ashley
    Putnam, Luke R.
    Harvey, Lucy
    Lipham, John C.
    HERNIA, 2024, 28 (05) : 1817 - 1822
  • [4] Laparoscopic Surgery for Recurrent Hiatal Hernia
    Degrandi, Olivier
    Laurent, Eva
    Najah, Haythem
    Aldajani, Nour
    Gronnier, Caroline
    Collet, Denis
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 30 (08): : 883 - 886
  • [5] Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction and Hiatal Hernia: Is Hernia Repair Alone Sufficient?
    DeLong, Colin G.
    Liu, Alexander T.
    Taylor, Matthew D.
    Lyn-Sue, Jerome R.
    Winder, Joshua S.
    Pauli, Eric M.
    Haluck, Randy S.
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2022, 26 (04)
  • [6] A systematic review and meta-analysis of mesh vs suture cruroplasty in laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair
    Tam, Vernissia
    Winger, Daniel G.
    Nason, Katie S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 211 (01) : 226 - 238
  • [7] Hiatal hernia recurrences after laparoscopic surgery: exploring the optimal technique
    Akmaz, B.
    Hameleers, A.
    Boerma, E. G.
    Vliegen, R. F. A.
    Greve, J. W. M.
    Meesters, B.
    Stoot, J. H. M. B.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (06): : 4431 - 4442
  • [8] Evaluation of antireflux surgery effectiveness in patients with hiatal hernia
    Klymenko, A., V
    Kravchenko, B. S.
    Klymenko, V. M.
    Serhieieva, L. N.
    Kravchenko, S. M.
    Tkachov, V. S.
    PATHOLOGIA, 2022, 19 (03): : 183 - 188
  • [9] 'Mesh hiatal hernioplasty' versus 'suture cruroplasty' in laparoscopic para-oesophageal hernia surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sathasivam, Rajeev
    Bussa, Gopinath
    Viswanath, Yirupaiahgari
    Obuobi, Reece-Bolton
    Gill, Talvinder
    Reddy, Anil
    Shanmugam, Venkat
    Gilliam, Andy
    Thambi, Prem
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 42 (01) : 53 - 60
  • [10] Impact of pre-existing mesh at the hiatus at revisional hiatal hernia surgery
    Barazanchi, Ahmed W. H.
    Chui, Juanita Noeline
    Bhimani, Nazim
    Leibman, Steven
    Smith, Garett
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2024, 37 (10)