Sequential gemcitabine-carboplatin followed by paclitaxel-carboplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer:: A phase II study

被引:4
作者
Mäenpää, JU
Grénman, SE
Jalkanen, JT
Kuoppala, TA
Leminen, AO
Puistola, US
Vuolo-Merilä, PM
Yliskoski, MH
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, FI-33521 Tampere, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Hosp Oulu, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Oulu, Finland
[4] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland
[5] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, SF-70210 Kuopio, Finland
关键词
sequential chemotherapy; gemcitabine; carboplatin; paclitaxel; first-line treatment; ovarian cancer;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.09.043
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To determine the feasibility and efficacy of sequential gemcitabine-carboplatin followed by paclitaxel-carboplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, with the response rate as the primary endpoint. Methods. After primary laparotomy, 56 patients with FIGO Stages III-IV disease were given 4 cycles of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) d1,8 and carboplatin AUC5 (44 patients) or AUC6 (12 patients) d1 q3wk followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) d1 and carboplatin AUC5/6 q3wk. Of the tumors, 43 were serous, 6 clear cell, 4 endometrioid, and 3 anaplastic type. Thirty-seven (66.1%) of the patients were suboptimally debulked. Results. Forty-seven patients were evaluable for response by CA-125 criteria, and 46 (98%) responded. Thirty patients (after gemcitabine-carboplatin) and 24 (after paclitaxel-carboplatin) were evaluable for response by CT (RECIST criteria), respectively. After the four gemcitabine-carboplatin cycles, the objective response rate was 83% (6 CR, 19 PR). Following completion of the whole sequential regimen, 7 patients showed a CR and 15 a PR, respectively, giving a response rate of 92%. The median progression-free survival was 12.8 months after a median follow-up of 19 months (range 7-35 months). The median overall survival has not been reached yet. The main toxicity was neutropenia as 139/221 (62.9%) of the gemcitabine-carboplatin cycles and 92/181 (50.8%) of the pactitaxel-carboplatin cycles, respectively, were associated with Grades 3-4 neutropenia. Neutropenia was reported as a serious adverse event in 5.7% of the cycles, and G-CSF support was needed in 18.4% of the cycles. Only the gemcitabine-carboplatin cycles were associated with a marked thrombocytopenia (32.1% Grades 3-4). Of the other side effects, marked allergy occurred in 14/52 (27%) exposed to paclitaxel. A total of 14 patients discontinued the treatment prematurely: 3 due to lack of efficacy, 1 due to protocol violation, and 10 due to toxicity (4 allergic reactions to paclitaxel, 3 complicated neutropenias, 1 fever, and 2 unspecified toxicities). The mean relative dose intensities were: gemcitabine 84.0%, paclitaxel 85.4%, and carboplatin 96.5%. Of the gemcitabine-carboplatin cycles and paclitaxel-carboplatin cycles, 32% and 38% were delayed, respectively. Gemcitabine d8 dose had to be omitted in 8% of the cycles. Conclusion. The sequential regimen of gemcitabine-carboplatin followed by paclitaxel-carboplatin is feasible in chemotherapy-naive ovarian cancer. Although its use is associated with a marked neutropenia, the neutropenia is manageable. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 119
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
BONADONNA G, 1995, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V273, P542
[2]   Carboplatin dosing formulae: gender bias and the use of creatinine-based methodologies [J].
Calvert, AH ;
Egorin, MJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 38 (01) :11-16
[3]   A randomized clinical trial of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer [J].
du Bois, A ;
Lück, HJ ;
Meier, W ;
Adams, HP ;
Möbus, V ;
Costa, S ;
Bauknecht, T ;
Richter, B ;
Warm, M ;
Schröder, W ;
Olbricht, S ;
Nitz, U ;
Jackisch, C ;
Emons, G ;
Wagner, U ;
Kuhn, W ;
Pfisterer, J .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2003, 95 (17) :1320-1330
[4]  
HANSEN SW, 1999, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V18, P1379
[5]   p53 gene status and response to platinum/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy in advanced ovarian carcinoma [J].
Lavarino, C ;
Pilotti, S ;
Oggionni, M ;
Gatti, L ;
Perego, P ;
Bresciani, G ;
Pierotti, MA ;
Scambia, G ;
Ferrandina, G ;
Fagotti, A ;
Mangioni, C ;
Lucchini, V ;
Vecchione, F ;
Bolis, G ;
Scarfone, G ;
Zunino, F .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (23) :3936-3945
[6]   Phase III trial of standard-dose intravenous cisplatin plus paclitaxel versus moderately high-dose carboplatin followed by intravenous paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin in small-volume stage III ovarian carcinoma: An intergroup study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group, Southwestern Oncology Group, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [J].
Markman, M ;
Bundy, BN ;
Alberts, DS ;
Fowler, JM ;
Clark-Pearson, DL ;
Carson, LF ;
Wadler, S ;
Sickel, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (04) :1001-1007
[7]   Phase III randomized trial of 12 versus 3 months of maintenance paclitaxel in patients with advanced ovarian cancer after complete response to platinum and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy: A Southwest Oncology Group and Gynecologic Oncology Group trial [J].
Markman, M ;
Liu, PY ;
Wilczynski, S ;
Monk, B ;
Copeland, LJ ;
Alvarez, RD ;
Jiang, C ;
Alberts, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (13) :2460-2465
[8]   Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer [J].
McGuire, WP ;
Hoskins, WJ ;
Brady, MF ;
Kucera, PR ;
Partridge, EE ;
Look, KY ;
ClarkePearson, DL ;
Davidson, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (01) :1-6
[9]   PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF CA-125 IN ADVANCED OVARIAN-CANCER [J].
MOGENSEN, O .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1992, 44 (03) :207-212
[10]   Phase III randomized study of cisplatin versus paclitaxel versus cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with suboptimal stage III or IV ovarian cancer: A gynecologic oncology group study [J].
Muggia, FM ;
Braly, PS ;
Brady, MF ;
Sutton, G ;
Niemann, TH ;
Lentz, SL ;
Alvarez, RD ;
Kucera, PR ;
Small, JM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (01) :106-115