Tumour characteristics, oncological and functional outcomes in patients aged 70 years undergoing radical prostatectomy

被引:34
作者
Kunz, Inga [1 ]
Musch, Michael [1 ]
Roggenbuck, Ulla [2 ]
Klevecka, Virgilijus [1 ]
Kroepfl, Darko [1 ]
机构
[1] Kliniken Essen Mitte, Dept Urol Paediat Urol & Urol Oncol, D-45136 Essen, Germany
[2] Univ Duisburg Essen, Inst Med Informat Biometry & Epidemiol, Essen, Germany
关键词
prostate cancer; retropubic prostatectomy; elderly; treatment outcome; tumour grading; tumour staging; CURATIVE THERAPY; OLDER MEN; CANCER; MANAGEMENT; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11368.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Study Type Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? The marked increase in life expectancy in recent years calls for reconsideration of the decision-making process for the treatment of prostate cancer, a condition particularly affecting the elderly. To date the general approach in elderly patients has tended to be more conservative, not least as it is generally thought that prostate cancer in these patients is less biologically aggressive. The present data showed that patients aged 70 years had biologically more aggressive tumours significantly more often than those aged <70 years. Nevertheless, advanced age itself was not an independent predictor of survival after retropubic radical prostatectomy, whereas adverse prostate cancer features and severe comorbidities were. OBJECTIVE center dot To investigate the effect of advanced age (70 years) on prostate cancer characteristics, oncological and functional outcomes in patients undergoing retropubic radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS center dot Between June 1997 and September 2009, 1636 patients underwent RP at one institution. center dot Of these patients, 1225 were aged < 70 years and 411 70 years. Both groups were compared for prostate cancer characteristics, oncological and functional outcomes. center dot Multivariate analyses were used to estimate the effect of advanced age on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), biochemical recurrence-free survival (BFS) and postoperative continence. RESULTS center dot The median (range) age of the patients aged 70 years was 72(7085) years and for those aged < 70 years was 64(4069) years (P < 0.001), respectively. The patients aged 70 years were assigned higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classes (P < 0.001) reflecting a higher rate of severe comorbidities in this group. center dot In the patients aged 70 years there were significantly more clinically palpable and pathologically non-organ-confined tumours (P= 0.030 and P= 0.026, respectively), and higher biopsy and RP Gleason scores (P= 0.002 and P= 0.004, respectively). Accordingly, patients aged 70 years presented with a higher proportion of high-risk prostate cancer, although the difference was not significant (P= 0.060). There were no differences between the groups for preoperative prostate-specific antigen level (P= 0.898), rate of pelvic lymph node dissection (P= 0.231), pN+ (P= 0.526) and R+ status (P= 0.590). center dot KaplanMeier curves showed a significantly lower 10-year OS (67 vs 82%; P= 0.017) and a trend towards a lower 10-year CSS (70 vs 83%; P= 0.057) in patients aged 70 years. center dot However, on multivariate analysis advanced age was not an independent predictor of OS (P= 0.102) or CSS (P= 0.195), whereas pN+ status (both P < 0.001), RP Gleason scores 810 (both P < 0.001) and ASA classes 34 (P= 0.037 and P= 0.028, respectively) were. center dot The 2-year postoperative continence rates was comparable between the groups (International Continence Society [ICS] male incontinence symptom score 2.10 vs 2.01; P= 0.984). In multivariate analysis it depended only on the preoperative ICSmale incontinence symptom score (P < 0.001) but not on advanced age (P= 0.341). CONCLUSIONS center dot Patients aged 70 years had biologically more aggressive and locally advanced tumours significantly more often than those aged < 70 years. center dot However, advanced age itself was not an independent predictor of survival after RP. Rather, survival was associated with adverse prostate cancer features and severe comorbidities. center dot Consequently, it seems unjustifiable to generally exclude elderly patients from RP, not least because surgery achieved excellent postoperative continence in this age group, too.
引用
收藏
页码:E24 / E29
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] 20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer
    Albertsen, PC
    Hanley, JA
    Fine, J
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (17): : 2095 - 2101
  • [2] Competing risk analysis of men aged 55 to 74 years at diagnosis managed conservatively for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Albertsen, PC
    Hanley, JA
    Gleason, DF
    Barry, MJ
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11): : 975 - 980
  • [3] Do older men benefit from curative therapy of localized prostate cancer?
    Alibhai, SMH
    Naglie, G
    Nam, R
    Trachtenberg, J
    Krohn, MD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (17) : 3318 - 3327
  • [4] Prostate Cancer in Men 70 Years Old or Older, Indolent or Aggressive: Clinicopathological Analysis and Outcomes
    Brassell, Stephen A.
    Rice, Kevin R.
    Parker, Patrick M.
    Chen, Yongmei
    Farrell, James S.
    Cullen, Jennifer
    McLeod, David G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (01) : 132 - 137
  • [5] Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    D'Amico, AV
    Whittington, R
    Malkowicz, SB
    Schultz, D
    Blank, K
    Broderick, GA
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Renshaw, AA
    Kaplan, I
    Beard, CJ
    Wein, A
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11): : 969 - 974
  • [6] Pathological Characteristics of Prostate Cancer in Elderly Men
    Delongchamps, Nicolas B.
    Wang, Ching Y.
    Chandan, Vishal
    Jones, Richard F.
    Threatte, Gregory
    Jumbelic, Mary
    de la Roza, Gustavo
    Haas, Gabriel P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (03) : 927 - 930
  • [7] Scoring the short form ICSmaleSF questionnaire
    Donovan, JL
    Peters, TJ
    Abrams, P
    Brookes, ST
    De la Rosette, JJMCH
    Schäfer, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (06) : 1948 - 1955
  • [8] Management of prostate cancer in older men: recommendations of a working group of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology
    Droz, Jean-Pierre
    Balducci, Lodovico
    Bolla, Michel
    Emberton, Mark
    Fitzpatrick, John M.
    Joniau, Steven
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Monfardini, Silvio
    Moul, Judd W.
    Naeim, Arash
    van Poppel, Hendrik
    Saad, Fred
    Sternberg, Cora N.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 106 (04) : 462 - 469
  • [9] Comparison of recommendations by urologists and radiation oncologists for treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer
    Fowler, FJ
    Collins, MM
    Albertsen, PC
    Zietman, A
    Elliott, DB
    Barry, MJ
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (24): : 3217 - 3222
  • [10] German Statistics Office, 2012, DURCHSCHN WEIT LEB N, P478